It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


WATCHING: IG Horowitz Senate Hearing

page: 20
<< 17  18  19   >>

log in


posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 07:00 AM
a reply to: shooterbrody

Still a good day


Hawley then called out the Democratic National Committee for instigating the whole mess.

The DNC pays for the Steele dossier, solicits the Steele dossier, and then gets the Federal Bureau of Investigation to go get FISA warrants, surveil an American citizen, and surveil a presidential campaign all on the basis of this manufactured garbage that they paid for.I mean that’s extraordinary," he complained. "That has got to be a first time in history. In fact, let me just ask you, Mr. Horowitz, are you aware ever of another presidential campaign being targeted by the FBI like the Trump campaign was?”

Horowitz had to answer in the negative and also confirmed what we all knew was the case: that the DNC did pay for the Steele dossier that has been proven to be false and defamatory nonsense that was used to justify the spying.

"To me, this is the untold story of the 2016 campaign," continued Hawley. "I don't know who at the DNC hatched this, but I suppose they ought to take a victory lap, but certainly they should be remembered for it; to get the FBI to pursue surveillance of a rival presidential campaign and then into the newly elected president's term I think is just extraordinary."

It was a very good day

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 07:11 AM

Here's that vid of Hawley so y'all can watch it. To think, we almost re-elected ol' "Mom Voice" McCaskill.

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 09:14 AM

Debbie was not a good manager. She hadn’t been very interested in controlling the party—she let Clinton’s headquarters in Brooklyn do as it desired so she didn’t have to inform the party officers how bad the situation was.

The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC,Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

Inside Hillary Clintons Secret Takeover of the DNC

Spygate 100% Clinton Owned and Operated, with a lot of help from an outgoing president.

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 09:21 AM

This is a bombshell that unequivocally shows the real collusion was between the FBI and Donald Trump’s opposition — the DNC, Hillary and a Trump-hating British intel officer — to hijack the election, rather than some conspiracy between Putin and Trump,” a knowledgeable source told me.

Everything Old is new Again

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 09:24 AM

Sale of 19.5% stake of Rosneft

An illustration of the carrot and stick principle in a 1916 Boardman Robinson anti-war cartoon.
The dossier alleged on October 18, 2016, that Sechin "offered PAGE/TRUMP's associates the brokerage of up to a 19 per cent (privatised) stake in Rosneft" (worth about $11 billion) in exchange for Trump lifting the sanctions against Russia after his election.[


A CIA asset meets with whoever.

So falsify FISA warrants to spy on him.

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 10:02 AM
I was working yesterday and unable to keep up with this thread live.

My big takeaway.

The dems tried to focus on saying the start of the investigation was legit. This is only because the threshold for launching this type of investigation was so low, something Horowitz seemed to suggest needs to change (more agencies need to be informed, etc.

The dems act as if ths is somehow a victory, yet now that the standard has been set, if Trump uses his FBI in such a way to wiretap his opponents campaign they will go insane.

Also, we shall see if Durham agrees the Papadopolous story was a legit reason to start the investigation.

But even if we accept it was, it is clear the IG found incredible abuses once the investigation got started.

The dems downplayed this as "mistakes" from the fbi. These were not mistakes. They intentionally omitted evidence, sometimes telling the total opposite of the truth. They knew the dossier was garbage but used it for at least 6 months afterwards to spy on a trump associate.

The dems claim there was no bias, but even if that is true, saying the FBI is incredibly incompetent is hardly something to cheer on.

And horowitz admits just because he didnt find evidence of intentional misconduct other than the one FBI lawyer (which is bad enough) he received no satisfactory answer as to why these abuses occured, and bias could in fact be a reason.

He even goes so far as to say even entry level FBI people should have known what happened was wrong, so it seems like we should be able to rule incompetence out.

The fact the dems, media, and FBI leadership downplays this shows they are in fact cheering on FBI corruption because it targeted trump. It is a coup

And whether it be incpmpetence of the highest level or willful misconduct, we can no longer trust anything the FBI says, including about all of there recent investigations (russia, trump collusion, hillary server, etc)

Ill be doing a live stream on this at noon.

edit on 12-12-2019 by Grambler because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 10:25 AM
a reply to: Grambler

The dems act as if ths is somehow a victory, yet now that the standard has been set, if Trump uses his FBI in such a way to wiretap his opponents campaign they will go insane.

Also, we shall see if Durham agrees the Papadopolous story was a legit reason to start the investigation.

The FBI didn't Plant Mifsud. Other Nations Intel services did most probably. They wouldn't have done that without a request from very high up in the Obama Administration. Downer if I remember correctly, was very obvious to Papadopoulos as he put his phone down recording their conversation. Also the money that was given to Papadapolus from either Mifsud or Halper (forget which one) must have had tracers on it. As soon as he arrived back in the US, he was arrested and they searched hard for that money, which he had left securely with his attorney.

Once we find out the whole Papadopoulos thing was a sting operation started by the Obama Admin and carried out by our Allies, all hell should break loose.

There is no way the Obama Admin will be able to spin their way out of this.

edit on 12-12-2019 by pavil because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 10:31 AM

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: neo96
At any rate.

I can see why Durham disagrees with the IG report.

Amazingly, small (but important?) changes were made to I.G. Horowitz's FISA-abuse report today...2 days after it was published.

Apparently, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions set a "Leak Trap" that today's IG Report modifications reveal, according to:

Dare I say "Trust Sessions"?

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 10:32 AM
a reply to: pavil

I think Brennan planted Mifsud.

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 12:53 PM

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: pavil

I think Brennan planted Mifsud.

I'm guessing Brennan contacted British Intel who then did the farming out of Halper and Mifsud.
They also probably either did or farmed out the eavesdropping of Trump's communications, so the Obama Admin could deny they did it. Mifsud had a cell phone with a British SIM card that was never supposed to get in Trump's hand and I think Barr got it in Italy. Remember the Mueller Report characterizes Mifsud as a Russian Asset, in reality he was a Western/UK Asset.

Gina Haspel was CIA station chief in London during that time and now she is CIA Director for Trump. Draw your own conclusions on that.

posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 10:04 PM

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
Lindsey did a great job of showing the clear...clear bias.

No bias was found by horrorwitz...what a joke.

Here is the problem. Horowitz, and his staff, could only ask these people "were/are you bias against candidate/President Trump?" Of course the establishment hacks will claim "no", but Horowitz did not have the power to just ascertain whether or not there was true bias. He even stated this a couple of times.

However, Barr will have more power and will be able to judge whether or not there was bias.

Of course there was, and is bias. We have the statements from Steele himself saying he would do anything to stop Trump from being/becoming POTUS. We have the text messages of Stzork, and his lawyer lover Page, whom even mentioned an insurance against Trump in case he won.

We even have evidence that the socialists/former democrats wanted to impeach President Trump since the very first day he was officially POTUS..."

The socialists/former democrats have used EVERY LIE in their playbook to try to impeach the POTUS, and that in itself shows there is to this day bias against President Trump. More so when the libtards are using LIES to try to impeach him...

edit on 13-12-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.

posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 10:49 PM
a reply to: pavil
I hope they burn black nixon down.

posted on Dec, 14 2019 @ 08:47 PM
a reply to: ketsuko

Considering all the ruckus about Trump's debunked Russian collusion and not a peep about Hillary's confirmed Russian collusion pretty clear to see what is suitable to some and it is not truth.

posted on Dec, 14 2019 @ 08:52 PM
a reply to: fringeofthefringe

I have yet to see one

posted on Dec, 15 2019 @ 08:09 AM
I didn't watch live ….. I did view 3 YT videos though

my thought were that Horowitz was not calling out the FBI... nor anyone of doing Criminal Activity....

nope, instead he tip-toed around blame... so as to not offend anyone ….

and wind up on the Body Count list of mystery deaths

his Report is not damaging to the Democrats nor the rogue bad-actors in law/intel Agencies that were turned into Weaponized Agencies by anti-constitutionalists in-sheeps-clothing


originally posted by: ketsuko

now I learned from a 4th YT video......………...…….. thanks for linking it in your post Mr K

edit on th31157642034615322019 by St Udio because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 16 2019 @ 08:08 AM

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: pavil

I think Brennan planted Mifsud.

I see your "brennan" and raise you barak.
I think it was all his idea.
he got away with fast and furious and the irs
why not the intel community too?

top topics

<< 17  18  19   >>

log in