It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Countermeasures
what are you debunking, the micronuke or the zionist part?
I mean, the micronuke is even too much of a stretch for my imagination to dignify with a debunk.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
That article is bunk. It shows some good photos of the crime scene, but presents absolutely no evidence to support the claim that 1 ton of conventional explosives were used. Absolutely NO EVIDENCE was presented. I repeat, there was nothing in that article that we didn't already know.
The claim that unnamed 'explosives experts' decided it was a one ton sub-surface blast would be comforting..if there was any supporting evidence.
The blast could very well have been a conventional device. That article doesn't hold any water though. Sorry. Try again.
Aelita, Countermeasures, Judah
I'm glad you can all sleep soundly now that cedarland has confirmed your opinion.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Zionist Micronukes sounds good in Hollywood.
Originally posted by Aelita
One is: the surface explosion would produce a very high contamination at that location, via irradiation of soil with neutrons.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
The radiation usually left over from a nuclear blast comes almost entirely from the U 235 shell that is used to ensure criticality. If there was no shell, only a P 239 core with some, as yet unidentified detonation mechanism, there would be only Alpha radiation at the scene. Alpha radiation, as I'm sure you're aware, dissiapates quickly and is undetectable by all but the most sophisticated sensors.
This corresponds with the evidence. The concept of ADM (Atomic Demolitions Munitions) is not new. Check out the link to the other thread and read up on the properties of ADM and the theories surrounding 'how a micro nuke might work'. There are several threads available on ATS for you to persuse as well.
I'm certainly not saying the only possibility was a micro nuke. I'm saying it's one of three possibilities. Given what we know about advances in nuclear arms technology, and the desire of a few countries to develop 'invisible' nukes, this isn't too far out to be considered.
from WyrdeOne
Go back to the facts and tell me WHY the micronuke theory is bunk. Use facts and data collected from the crime scenes to prove it was not a micronized nuclear device. You saying it doesn't make it so.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Zionist Micronukes sounds good in Hollywood.
I think I understand what you're trying to say, that it's dramatic to blame a micro nuke, but perhaps your choice of words wasn't the best? Do you know what a Zionist is?
:sigh:
Go back to the facts and tell me WHY the micronuke theory is bunk. Use facts and data collected from the crime scenes to prove it was not a micronized nuclear device. You saying it doesn't make it so.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Originally posted by Aelita
One is: the surface explosion would produce a very high contamination at that location, via irradiation of soil with neutrons.
The radiation usually left over from a nuclear blast comes almost entirely from the U 235 shell that is used to ensure criticality. If there was no shell, only a P 239 core with some, as yet unidentified detonation mechanism, there would be only Alpha radiation at the scene. Alpha radiation, as I'm sure you're aware, dissiapates quickly and is undetectable by all but the most sophisticated sensors.
Originally posted by Aelita
Sorry dude but you get a failing grade in nuclear physics.
A lot of radiation comes from the fragments resulting from the fission of the Uranium or Plutonium. A large fraction of it would be beta and gamma. The way it works is there is typically a whole "chain" of decays a nucleus would undergo, shedding beta, gamma and sometimes alpha in the process. Until it reaches a stable configuration.
Check the reference books on nuclei.
Class dismissed.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Dissenters are asked to prove that a micronuke was not used.
Originally posted by nygdan
A 'micronuke'? Thats just dumb. Nukes are used because they're super explosive. What good is a 'micronuke' to blow up a single car or what have you?
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
it would not be considered 'dumb', it would be considered 'vital to national security.'
don't just dismiss it out of hand and accept what's fed to you by the television. I thought that's what ATS was all about?
If I'm just a regular guy trying to understand the world, history and the facts will vindicate me.
Vialls has an agenda, but his blast analysis is sound,