It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Long Lance
Just one example, not very useful, intended to show that there are alternatives which are not readily visible.
.So just because a current induces a surrounding field you think that there's many times more energy in the flow than you originally put in? ?
Poynting flow may be there, but make no mistake, the energy transfer in the field is already linked to your wire, negating the entire notion. or am i being stupid? ! ?
you may or may not find this link useful: www.borderlands.com... , which incidentially deals with exactly the same problem, in a very different way, though, consider yourself forewarned.
Now the idea has been around for nearly 200 years, but because it is currently not used on a commercial level or used very much at all due to its high cost related to its effectiveness with the conversion, does not mean that the technology has been suppressed.
Originally posted by StellarX
Same old denials based on the same old strawman arguments proven quite false( again since it's been in evidence, if not effectively explained, since Maxwell's day) since the early 60's. I suggest you just go to Bearden's site or order his books if you really want to see all the source material i have on my desk while i type this.
Originally posted by wadefrazier3
There is one heck of a lot of hypothesis on this thread. I am writing from experience. Does anybody want to have an exchange with somebody with experience in these matters? I still have not seen one credible response to my work on this thread. Does somebody want to make one? A bunch of people have been reading my work by taking this thread, but I have not seen one reply yet.
Fischer, however, was taking on Carnot head on. About the only “inside” information I have about Fischer’s engine was hearing him talk about it for about five minutes, soon after he came aboard in Ventura. He said that in Carnot’s seminal work, he assumed an ideal gas in his ideal heat engine. Carnot then extrapolated his logic with his ideal gas heat engine to cover all heat engines, and Fischer said that that was where Carnot made his fatal error, and that liquid heat engines were ignored ever since. It harkens back to the notion that Carnot’s theory may have owed the steam engine more than the steam engine owed thermodynamics. Fischer’s hydraulic heat engine challenged Carnot’s assumption, and also the classical interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics. Fischer thought, like Mr. Mentor did, that a hydraulic heat engine, combined with Dennis’ LamCo-style panels, might have a chance at making free energy. It was not something that Dennis dreamed up. Fischer and Mr. Mentor are technical and scientific heavyweights, not fast-talking promoters. Fischer helped write thermodynamics textbooks, and he said that thermodynamics textbooks are, in large measure, expedient rubbish. What Fischer said sounded a lot like describing the expedient fairy tales that students are given by microbiology textbooks regarding Pasteur and the spontaneous generation theory. The data from Fischer’s first prototype had it coming closer to Carnot’s ideal than any other heat engine ever had.
The main issue was that in Fischer’s engine, only a percent or two of the working fluid ever became a gas, so far less entropy was created in the process, which made the efficiency rise dramatically. With both Fischer’s and Mr. Mentor’s engines, they do not need cooled condensers, which was what Watt’s engine was all about. That is a formidable mindbender for physicists and engineers to ponder.
..Moved to locate the source of this heat, town officials found two highly polished metal mirrors which faced each other - radiating a very great heat in rippling waves
The path which the Meucci models took inside Western Union has been traced. The models periodically kept appearing and disappearing in the electrical research labs of Western Union, revealed through the written studies of several curious individuals. The models were transferred among several engineers as successive new electrical directors were installed. Each examined the models in complete ignorance. Lacking introductory explanations, no one comprehended what the weighty wooden cups could do when electrified.
Originally posted by Long Lance
I did take a look at the Bearden website, and although i cannot rule out that we're infact using only uisng 1/1000th of what's there, don't you find it strange that what was induced by known means supposedly can't be extracted the same way (reversability?) yet is apparently destroyed yet unusable by these very same means.
If that didn't make sense (i'm afraid it didn't ) think of a coax cable, no uncontrolled poynting flow, see?
PS: my link basically stated that electric power travels along conductors but outside, not exactly mainstream, is it? now, if you're right then we are already happily probing the gas pipeline with a blowtorch
Originally posted by bodebliss
The only suppressed technology is a human being watching television.
If there is money in it, it will come to market.