It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Shifty Schiff Sets Up 2020 Elections as Illegitimate Unless Trump is Impeached

page: 12
62
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 12:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Wayfarer

So how is it Russian propaganda when you admit he said it. Are you claiming the Russians forced him to say it? The stuff you say is so crazy it's ridiculous.


Russians parroted the line before he did that interview. Him showing up to parrot their explanation with the threat of Russia looming at Ukraine's doorstep doesn't take any stretch of the imagination why someone would say untrue things when under existential duress.




posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 12:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

Hahahahahahhaha. So the guy Biden demanded be put in power to fight corruption is a corrupt Russian puppet now. It's like a comedy show.



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 12:32 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Ok, fine, then don't hold an election. Once Schiff and his ilk are finished crying, we can reelect Trump for 4 more years. But guess who will still be president and not get impeached while we wait...

Damn those people are stupid.



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Wayfarer

Hahahahahahhaha. So the guy Biden demanded be put in power to fight corruption is a corrupt Russian puppet now. It's like a comedy show.


That's not the guy Biden demanded be put in power



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Wayfarer

Hahahahahahhaha. So the guy Biden demanded be put in power to fight corruption is a corrupt Russian puppet now. It's like a comedy show.


That's not the guy Biden demanded be put in power

How can you be wrong every single time. Yes it is.

Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko told Hill.TV's John Solomon in an interview that aired Wednesday that U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch gave him a do not prosecute list during their first meeting.

thehill.com...

Shokin was replaced with Lutsenko by Biden. Lutsenko was the guy Biden got put in the position. Shokin left March 2016. Lutsenko was the guy Biden got Shokin replaced with and Lusenko started May 2016. Lutsenko has tried to come to the US to testify and was blocked by the Ambassador Trump fired.


Lutsenko says he was told he could not go after Burisma by the US.

The Ukrainian Prosecutor (Lutsenko) Then Provided Evidence Showing Yovanovitch Blocked Him From Providing The Evidence to US Authorities.

twitter.com...
edit on 11-12-2019 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Wayfarer

Hahahahahahhaha. So the guy Biden demanded be put in power to fight corruption is a corrupt Russian puppet now. It's like a comedy show.


That's not the guy Biden demanded be put in power

How can you be wrong every single time. Yes it is.

Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko told Hill.TV's John Solomon in an interview that aired Wednesday that U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch gave him a do not prosecute list during their first meeting.

thehill.com...

Shokin was replaced with Lutsenko by Biden. Lutsenko was the guy Biden got put in the position. Shokin left March 2016. Lutsenko was the guy Biden got Shokin replaced with and Lusenko started May 2016. Lutsenko has tried to come to the US to testify and was blocked by the Ambassador Trump fired.


Lutsenko says he was told he could not go after Burisma by the US.

The Ukrainian Prosecutor (Lutsenko) Then Provided Evidence Showing Yovanovitch Blocked Him From Providing The Evidence to US Authorities.

twitter.com...


Ah you are right I am confused (Lutsenko isn't the current prosecutor in Ukraine anymore but resigned earlier this year)...

Apro-pros of that however, why did Lutsenko claim that the Biden's didn't do anything illegal if he wasn't allowed to investigate Burisma? Furthermore, why hasn't Lutsenko just shown everybody the list that Yovanovitch presumably gave him if it really exists (and isn't some obvious fake)?
edit on 50pm19fpmWed, 11 Dec 2019 12:49:15 -0600America/ChicagoWed, 11 Dec 2019 12:49:15 -0600 by Wayfarer because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

Maybe he claimed it because the US told him to say it. A verbal list leaves no paper trail. Why wasn't he allowed to come to America and present evidence? He has proof the former ambassador prevented him from doing it. Why is the guy Biden got put in place lying?

The facts are not on your side.



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:14 PM
link   
a reply to: joemoe
Agreed Joe. Then what needs to happen is that we pick a large land mass away from population centers. Get the Marxists to meet us Patriots on the field of battle. One of us has got to go and it not going to be Constitutionalists. The military will keep all foreign intervention out like Russia and China. This country cannot and will not tolerate COMMUNISTS.



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Wayfarer

Maybe he claimed it because the US told him to say it. A verbal list leaves no paper trail. Why wasn't he allowed to come to America and present evidence? He has proof the former ambassador prevented him from doing it. Why is the guy Biden got put in place lying?

The facts are not on your side.


He waved around a list in his OAN interview which he claimed had signatures/stamps/the works. He's been mum on showing that to anyone though,...

Why is that you think?



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

How about we invite him here to show it. The US ambassador refused to let him. Why is that? Schiff could at any time ask to bring him here, he hasn't.

Just to clarify, you are lying about what he is showing. The letter he has in his hand is not the list. It is another lie Yovanovitch made. It is proof he sent her a letter about things Yovanovitch said he never sent her anything.
edit on 11-12-2019 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Wayfarer

How about we invite him here to show it. The US ambassador refused to let him. Why is that? Schiff could at any time ask to bring him here, he hasn't.


Because he's waving around forged documents and working at the behest of unknown entities. The state department has utterly refuted his most recent testimony and the so called document he had in hand. What more do they gain from bringing him here?



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

You didn't even know he made any of these accusations, you said it was all Shokin. Now you suddenly are an expert on exactly what he is saying and what has been proven? Such a liar. You are clueless on the subject. The paper he is waiving is not the list, it's another lie. It has never been refuted, ever.



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Wayfarer

The paper he is waiving is not the list, it's another lie.



Praytell who's fart did you huff to make that determination?



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Wayfarer

The paper he is waiving is not the list, it's another lie.



Praytell who's fart did you huff to make that determination?

Are you dense? Did you watch the video?

The list was told to him in 2016. The paper he is holding is dated Oct 2017.
He then says she said under oath to Congress I never sent any information (about the topic he wanted to discuss with the US in the US).
He then waves the paper and says "This is the official letter about topic I wanted to discuss in US and Yovanovitch blocked me". "She never answered me after this request and she lied in Congress".

What about that makes you think he is holding a list?



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04


What about that makes you think he is holding a list?


The part where he says 'its right here, signed with seals and everything'



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04


What about that makes you think he is holding a list?


The part where he says 'its right here, signed with seals and everything'

So when he says this is the information I SENT HER he is talking about a list SHE sent him because he says its right here with a seal? Hahahahahahaha, Democrats comedy hour.



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04


What about that makes you think he is holding a list?


The part where he says 'its right here, signed with seals and everything'

So when he says this is the information I SENT HER he is talking about a list SHE sent him because he says its right here with a seal? Hahahahahahaha, Democrats comedy hour.


How does it differ then? Wouldn't him sharing the list showing Yovanovitch lied be like the ultimate Trump card?



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04


What about that makes you think he is holding a list?


The part where he says 'its right here, signed with seals and everything'

So when he says this is the information I SENT HER he is talking about a list SHE sent him because he says its right here with a seal? Hahahahahahaha, Democrats comedy hour.


How does it differ then? Wouldn't him sharing the list showing Yovanovitch lied be like the ultimate Trump card?

How can he share a list if she verbally told him, or brought him a list to look at and took it back with her.

Why does any of that matter if she said he never sent her a request to come to America and he can prove he did? Are you saying if we can't prove every lie we should ignore the lies we can prove?

He says he can prove she lied under oath. Why are you against letting him come and prove it?
edit on 11-12-2019 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04


What about that makes you think he is holding a list?


The part where he says 'its right here, signed with seals and everything'

So when he says this is the information I SENT HER he is talking about a list SHE sent him because he says its right here with a seal? Hahahahahahaha, Democrats comedy hour.


How does it differ then? Wouldn't him sharing the list showing Yovanovitch lied be like the ultimate Trump card?

How can he share a list if she verbally told him, or brought him a list to look at and took it back with her.

Why does any of that matter if she said he never sent her a request to come to America and he can prove he did? Are you saying if we can't prove every lie we should ignore the lies we can prove?


He's holding the piece of paper! If that paper is a list of the entities Yovanovitch told him he was not allowed to investigate then it would be damning as hell, and him releasing it would be big.



posted on Dec, 11 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04


What about that makes you think he is holding a list?


The part where he says 'its right here, signed with seals and everything'

So when he says this is the information I SENT HER he is talking about a list SHE sent him because he says its right here with a seal? Hahahahahahaha, Democrats comedy hour.


How does it differ then? Wouldn't him sharing the list showing Yovanovitch lied be like the ultimate Trump card?

How can he share a list if she verbally told him, or brought him a list to look at and took it back with her.

Why does any of that matter if she said he never sent her a request to come to America and he can prove he did? Are you saying if we can't prove every lie we should ignore the lies we can prove?


He's holding the piece of paper! If that paper is a list of the entities Yovanovitch told him he was not allowed to investigate then it would be damning as hell, and him releasing it would be big.

What are you talking about. The paper he is holding has nothing to do with the list. He never said it did. The paper is the letter he sent to Yovanovitch about his desire to come to America and pass on information. Yovanovitch told Congress under oath he never sent her that paper, he can prove he did.



new topics

top topics



 
62
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join