It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

IG Report. Durham .....”another country heard from”

page: 2
30
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 02:51 PM
link   
If not out of bias.

Another reason one would FAKE(they did) Fisa Warrants?




posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1


the final nail in the coffin


I can’t think of one member that said that and I’ve been on almost all of these threads .

Many said that it would be a nail in the coffin I’ll grant you that.

I didn’t hear anyone say the final nail in the coffin .

We were all waiting on Durham also .

If nothing happens then you win celebrate away.

But because of the anger from Durham and Barr .

I suspect you will be holding the ball when it is kicked through the goalpost .
edit on 9-12-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Fallingdown

If the Mueller investigation was a waste of public money, as many Republicans claim, how are these repeated re-investigations that fail to even get convictions, not a bigger waste of money?




Does the IG convict people?


Not himself, he isn't a judge. The same as the Special Counsel isn't a judge. The same as the FBI and Police aren't judges.

None the less, if he had no means of enabling prosecution, he couldn't fulfill his role of prevention of inefficient or unlawful operations occurring within the parent agency that he oversees.

As an excuse for him not finding any wrongdoing, it is fairly thin.



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: chr0naut

Like I said earlier. Horowitz investigation is administrative .

Durham’s isn’t a re-investigation it’s coinciding investigation . With much more power .?

Durham’s don’t produce “convictions” it produces indictments .

Would you prefer that they investigated Trump with only limited power ?

Of course not but I can’t wait to see your response .


You are going off at a tangent. Horowitz investigated if there were politically motivated FISA abuses.

What did he find?



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
If not out of bias.

Another reason one would FAKE(they did) Fisa Warrants?


Horowitz's report disagrees.



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
So since the IG report was a dud we're moving the goalposts to the Durham report? I thought so. I've been saying it for years, every bombshell is a dud until the next bombshell date is set. 😂


Sounds like someone has no idea what the IG's job is.

He can't prosecute, can only investigate and refer.

Keep up.




He did investigate, and refer. I't done.

The outcome was...?


Whatever Durham and Barr decide to do... all this just gets folded into the actual criminal investigation.

You don't know much about American governmental structure, do you?




posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

First of all I’m not going off tangent .

This thread is about Horowitz and Barr’s feelings on the report .

And their take on the findings of the investigation

Secondly I’m honest he found nothing .

Now can you answer my question honestly?
edit on 9-12-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: neo96
If not out of bias.

Another reason one would FAKE(they did) Fisa Warrants?


Horowitz's report disagrees.


No it doesn't.

See page 11



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Ah, so Barr is yet ANOTHER investigation? Damn, they're stringing you along real good, they've got all kinds of investigations that lead to more investigations to keep you occupied for years on end.



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Horowitz's report disagrees


Of course it disagrees.

Your statement isn’t any kind of victory lap.

How many more times are you going to say it ?


edit on 9-12-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
So since the IG report was a dud we're moving the goalposts to the Durham report? I thought so. I've been saying it for years, every bombshell is a dud until the next bombshell date is set. 😂


Sounds like someone has no idea what the IG's job is.

He can't prosecute, can only investigate and refer.

Keep up.




He did investigate, and refer. I't done.

The outcome was...?


Whatever Durham and Barr decide to do... all this just gets folded into the actual criminal investigation.

You don't know much about American governmental structure, do you?




I only know what is published.

It's hard to second guess, what with all the opinion, excuses, caveats and fictions that are presented as if they are fact.



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fallingdown

Horowitz's report disagrees


Of course it disagrees.

Your statement isn’t any kind of victory lap.

How many more times are you going to say it ?


I am free to say it as many as I like.

Also, i'm not really in it for the win. I personally think we'll all be losers, regardless of who wins the election. There are some really tough times ahead and nobody is doing anything to soften the blow. They are all looking to the short term and trying desperately not to see the obvious.

It's like Trump bragging about the reduction in unemployment figures before he even took office. What sort of crap is that?



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:50 PM
link   
Yup a reply to: chr0naut


I am free to say it as many as I like.


Yes you are it’s just that I find the repetition mildly annoying. Lol


I personally think we'll all be losers,


I completely disagree with that. One side or the other is going to be elated .


They are all looking to the short term and trying desperately not to see the obvious.


I don’t understand that. The IG report is the short term today . Durham’s Report is currently long-term speculation .



It's like Trump bragging about the reduction in unemployment figures before he even took office. What sort of crap is that?


You’re looking at the past.

When Trump was elected the stock market soared which is an indicator for job growth.

What do the unemployment figures look like today ?
edit on 9-12-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: neo96
If not out of bias.

Another reason one would FAKE(they did) Fisa Warrants?


Horowitz's report disagrees.


No it doesn't.

See page 11


Page 11 (part of the Executive summary) speaks of text messages between 5 staff showing hostility towards candidate Trump and supportive of the Clinton campaign.

Is that against the law?

And how does that relate to the FISA warrants being genuine or fake?

To clarify what I said, the Horowitz report does not find the FISA reports were fake nor that they were improperly motivated or executed.



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 04:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
So since the IG report was a dud we're moving the goalposts to the Durham report? I thought so. I've been saying it for years, every bombshell is a dud until the next bombshell date is set. 😂
Lol, you're such a fool, this isn't moving the "Goal Post", it's all part of the same deal, Horowitz was always going to paint lipstick on a pig, while alluding to legit real world concerning issues as outlined in the report if you cared to read it because lets be honest you didn't.

Secondly, the pitiful rebuttal of "No one is in jail yet", this isn't like the movies where you slap on cuffs, 'nuff said, job well done, lmfao. This was an investigation and Horowitz is literally the soft core version of what's to come.

Furthermore, with Durham and Barr both essentially disagreeing with the conclusion, mainly related to information obtained in their much more expanded investigation, which if you haven't forgotten, is ***Criminally based.

Your post just demostrates how much of a troll you are, but I digress, all your life you thought the good guys will always prevail, but in reality, the bad guys dug in and payed off the good guys, which resulted in the swamp, years of this turned you off, becoming bitter at the prospect of actual real world legal clean up and I can't fault you for your ill and negative opinions on the issue.

However, here is Trump and while you don't like him, you can't deny the shake up this Man has done, so much so that we're having our first real check up on our intel agencies, I mean this is a good thing, right? Even if the perception is that nothing will be done, doesn't change the fact that we have outlined evidence of actual wrong doing for all to see and judge.

The higher ups react based off that, so go right on ahead and keep on downplaying this, your trolling means little to us, we're experiening exposure unlike anything our elders experienced and it isn't over with either, if Durham and Barr have indicated.



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 04:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fallingdown
Yup a reply to: chr0naut


I am free to say it as many as I like.


Yes you are it’s just that I find the repetition mildly annoying. Lol


I personally think we'll all be losers,


I completely disagree with that. One side or the other is going to be elated .


They are all looking to the short term and trying desperately not to see the obvious.


I don’t understand that. The IG report is the short term today . Durham’s Report is currently long-term speculation .



It's like Trump bragging about the reduction in unemployment figures before he even took office. What sort of crap is that?


You’re looking at the past.

When Trump was elected the stock market soared which is an indicator for job growth.

What do the unemployment figures look like today ?


US unemployment figures have been falling nearly linearly, since peaking in 2010.

If anything, the rate of the fall of unemployment reduced slightly in 2016.



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 04:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Fallingdown

And once the Durham report is a dud? What will the goalposts be moved back to then? All I've been hearing around here for months is the IG report, now all of a sudden it's not a big deal because the Durham report is coming. So predictable.


At the end of the day, one way or the other, the truth will come out, that is certain,
I’m betting it’s the people responsible for the biggest political circus in history

Dems



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 04:09 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

No it doesnt.

PAGE ELEVEN!



FALSIFIED.

OMITTED.



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Did they keep falling or did the economy collapse like the Democrats predicted ?


By the way talk about going off tangent . 🙄



posted on Dec, 9 2019 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

The democrats screamed about a unredacted version. We should do the same .



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join