posted on Dec, 7 2019 @ 09:15 AM
a reply to: DISRAELI
Like Jews an Roman's wanting to reject the gospel?
Then why is it brought up again in Revelations, with Rome being presented as the Fourth just like Daniel's vision hundreds of year before with the
adage of it being the first of the two? All the numero of the beast is highly implied to have been Niro/Nero...and that was said or hinted by John.
How about I accept Jesus, but I deny Paul, is that acceptable?
Not saying Paul is good or bad, just find it very weird that he given such significance, all the while never having met Jesus, but was given an a
vision or an image that he originally didnt respect.
And no, your just making superstitious claims to justify the logic, where as the old saying history can repeat itself, much like the fall of Roman
Republic and the rise of the Holy Roman Empire...which sounds communists btw with Caesar an what not.
edit on 7-12-2019 by Specimen88 because:
(no reason given)