It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Has Trump been secretly baiting the left into impeaching him?

page: 6
55
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: dashen


Has Trump been secretly baiting the left into impeaching him?


Obviously.

Trump is Putin's puppet, and destabilizing the US pollical system is their goal. Trump is just Putin's useful idiot.




......... and the Democrats just fell for the"Ruskie Ploy "?

Must be proud of them for unknowingly walking right into that huh?

They are Soooooo much smarter than Trump.




posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96



LIE.


You really shouldn't throw that term around so recklessly. It might come back on you like a boomerang.


The conservative news website The Washington Free Beacon says during the 2016 campaign it first hired the firm that later produced a dossier of unsubstantiated information about Donald Trump's Russia ties.


www.npr.org...

edit on 5-12-2019 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: toolgal462




I did not, and never have...wished stage 4 cancer on you or anyone else.


You supported the inflection of the poster's diseased post, by deflecting and criticizing my taste in music. You did not condemn the post in question, you supported the diseased attack with your subsequent attack.



That's weak. TDS is a taunt. Nothing remotely close to hoping someone gets 4th stage cancer.

Maybe you should take a break. It would seem being wrong and knowing it is having an adverse effect on you.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Your inability to comprehend what you read is astounding.

Citizens United has nothing to do with a campaign, through their attorneys, paying for disinformation provided by Russian intelligence. It's about corporations being able to donate money to political campaigns.

And yes, we all know a republican paid fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump.
What you conveniently leave out is that, after the nomination, the DNC and Hillary campaign began paying fusion GPS, who then hired Steele. Steele was not a part of the arrangement between Fusion GPS and the initial republican funders.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454




And they backed out of that when they realized Trump would be the front runner.


What does that have to do with the law and the Citizen's United ruling, that allows corporations, not identified with any campaign, to hire foreign entities to do oppo research on candidates?



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Sookiechacha




The Free Beacon initially hired Fusion GPS, who eventually hired Christopher Steele.


LIE.



In April 2016, an attorney for Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC separately hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump, while The Free Beacon stopped its backing in May of 2016.[3] In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier. DNC officials denied knowing their attorney had contracted with Fusion GPS, and Steele asserted he was not aware the Clinton campaign was the recipient of his research until months after he contracted with Fusion GPS.[10][11]


Both Team Clinton,DNC,Steele are also LYING.

It's currently what they are trying to impeach Trump for, but perfectly acceptable for Clinton and the DNC to hire a foreign agent to effect the outcome an election.
en.wikipedia.org...


He must have been a terrible spy to be asked to find dirt on a Presidential candidate, not realizing what it might be used for, and by whom.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:35 PM
link   
Is this the fanfic section of ATS?



Have we gone past the "nothing worth impeaching" and now its "he wanted to be impeached".

If he wanted them to push for impeachment he should've just done a Bill Clinton in the office.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Jane Mayer reported that when the Clinton campaign "indirectly employed" Steele, Elias created a "legal barrier" by acting as a "firewall" between the campaign and Steele.


en.wikipedia.org...

That's also a LIE.

It was UNLAWFUL for Perkins Coie to act as the middleman


Professional corporations
Although law firms, doctors’ practices and similar businesses are often organized as partnerships, some of these businesses may instead be professional corporations. Unlike a partnership, a professional corporation is prohibited from making any contributions because contributions from corporations are unlawful.




Foreign nationals
Campaigns may not solicit or accept contributions from foreign nationals. Federal law prohibits contributions, donations, expenditures and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any election — federal, state or local. This prohibition includes contributions or donations made to political committees and building funds and to make electioneering communications. Furthermore, it is a violation of federal law to knowingly provide substantial assistance in the making, acceptance or receipt of contributions or donations in connection with federal and nonfederal elections to a political committee, or for the purchase or construction of an office building. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, acting as a conduit or intermediary for foreign national contributions and donations.


Steele was compensated for his contribution.

www.fec.gov...

Twice removed.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: dashen

Well, the Mueller report basically cleared Trump's inner circle of conspiracy, because they were just too dumb to pull it off.

Then, Bill Barr, basically. cleared Trump for obstruction of justice, because he was just so frustrated with the whole witch hunt that his obstruction was justified.




Sigh.... If only those Damn Trumpers were smarter, we would have caught them in our Sting Operations.

And you were so close.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454



He must have been a terrible spy to be asked to find dirt on a Presidential candidate, not realizing what it might be used for, and by whom


He was a terrible spy, and nothing more than a political hack.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Read god dammit.

Clinton and the DNC hire them in April.

Beacon pulled out in May.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: TooCloseToTheSun
Is this the fanfic section of ATS?



Have we gone past the "nothing worth impeaching" and now its "he wanted to be impeached".

If he wanted them to push for impeachment he should've just done a Bill Clinton in the office.


Welcome to the newcomer...First post and all.

THIS is what inspired you to finally jump in?

lol



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: elDooberino

There is no dispute that the Steele Dossier was legally obtained, whether you like it or not. There is no, nor has there even been, a DOJ investigation on whether or not the Steele Dossier was illegally procured. For that, you can thank the Supreme Court for their Citizen's United ruling.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

What should I be looking for in the mirror? Help me out here. Try to be specific.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Wardaddy454




And they backed out of that when they realized Trump would be the front runner.


What does that have to do with the law and the Citizen's United ruling, that allows corporations, not identified with any campaign, to hire foreign entities to do oppo research on candidates?



Everything, since the Steele Dossier comes from the labors of the DNC, Fusion GPS and foreign agents Steele and his Russian sources.

As I've already posted, the Free Beacon hired Fusion GPS, but everything found out the time was sourced from the public realm. Steele and his dossier didn't enter the picture until after the DNC hired Fusion GPS. Whom I'll remind you, employed the wife of an Obama admin DOJ official at the time, whom also knew Steele. I don't think Obama would endorse such a thing, especially if he or an underling were in fact involved in such untoward acts. So I don't buy his act of being against the ruling.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Source, and source of the law broken, and subsequent criminal indictment, please.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Read god dammit.

Clinton and the DNC hire them in April.

Beacon pulled out in May.



Doesn't matter, words mean something different to Lefties than they do to the rest of us.

for example:

In Lefties world, "no evidence of a crime" means "guilty of said crime".

In Lefties world, "you don't know Rob Zombie when you see him" means "you wished me stage 4 cancer"

In Lefties world, when Manafort is convicted of crimes from years prior to joining Trumps campaign staff, that means that Trump was found guilty of conspiring with Russia.

The left has a much broader interpretation and grasp of the english language you see....



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454




Everything, since the Steele Dossier comes from the labors of the DNC, Fusion GPS and foreign agents Steele and his Russian sources.


Nope. No labor from the DNC. This was the labor of GPS Fusion, and the contractors that they hired. Unfortunately, it was all legal.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: neo96

Source, and source of the law broken, and subsequent criminal indictment, please.



I already GAVE the source.

www.fec.gov...

There it is again.



posted on Dec, 5 2019 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Wardaddy454

What should I be looking for in the mirror? Help me out here. Try to be specific.


Hypocrisy for one.
Delusion for two.
Projection for three.
Mob mentality for four.

shall I continue?



new topics

top topics



 
55
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join