It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pofessor At Nadler's Circus Show States Shipshod Impeachment Effort Is WRONG

page: 3
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:54 PM
link   


I want NOTHING.

There was NO QUID PRO.
a reply to: neo96

when was that written?




posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: tinner07

What crime did Trump admit to?


Winning.


So, Tinner thinks that winning the election is an impeachable offense?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



I want NOTHING.

There was NO QUID PRO.
a reply to: neo96

when was that written?




Sondland testified to this , better bone up on your impeachment facts. It was SAID to Sondland, by Trump.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:59 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07



I want NOTHING.

No quid Pro Quo.

I want Zelensky to do the right thing.

IMPEACH the muffer!



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:05 PM
link   
Well, to hear Schiffty tell it, that means that Trump was actually admitting to "quid pro quo"

SMH

And this is what we pay taxes for?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: toolgal462




And this is what we pay taxes for?


Yes.

This is what we pay taxes for.

To watch Trump haters act like Nazis during the jewish purge during the 1930s.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: toolgal462

Sandland and vindman should be indicted for lying to Congress. Their opening statements were in direct contradiction to what they said in their verbal testimony.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Yep, they read statements written for them by Dem partisans. Sondland didn't even know WTF was in his opening statement.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Congressional term limits.

Ending Congressionial immunity is a precedent this country desperately needs.

You've got that right! If nothing else from this circus, we have learned that congress people, on both sides, are absolutely self-absorbed, incompetent freeloaders. They care nothing about doing the what their job description says.

I agree, we definitely need term limits. It used to be that the old, seasoned veterans in congress would groom the new kids. That's not happening these days as we can see. Thus, they are totally ineffective. Along with term limits, we also need the following:

Raises should be voted on "by the people" as a referendum during national elections;
Congress people should be forced to use the same health care system they legislate;
Congress people should be required to disclose any foundations they gain income from;
Congress people should be held to objectives (just like my job) such as achieving a balanced budget;

I'm sure there's more but I'm tired right now.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

I think the argument, "if this not impeachable then nothing is" argument is a strong one. Trump got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Getting caught has consequences. Shut up and deal with it.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:31 PM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

Caught doing what? Talking to the President of Ukraine?

Caught conducting foreign diplomacy?

caught taking a cookie?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: shawmanfromny

I think the argument, "if this not impeachable then nothing is" argument is a strong one. Trump got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Getting caught has consequences. Shut up and deal with it.
Except nothing of the sort happened, you should just shush and deal with it as you say 😌



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: dfnj2015

Caught doing what? Talking to the President of Ukraine?

Caught conducting foreign diplomacy?

caught taking a cookie?

Nothing, that's the users default post to all things Trump, the user doesn't actually know himself and thus is entitled to their wrongful opinions and assumptions.
edit on 4-12-2019 by Arnie123 because: Truth



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015




I think the argument, "if this not impeachable then nothing is" argument is a strong one.


It's a strong # 5.

kreativcopywriting.com...
edit on 4-12-2019 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:37 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I think all of them apply



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07

She was giving an interview saying that Trump needs to be impeached a few weeks after he got in.

trump asked if he could pardon himself too right? like right when he got in?


I am pretty sure if Trump said that it was just a joke.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: tinner07



She was giving an interview saying that Trump needs to be impeached a few weeks after he got in.

As were the other two lawyers...lol

When they weren't commentators on CNN or NBC.

I kid you not... you should see the background on those "experts".

Turley had it right.
a reply to: Lumenari

But like you said... Your opinion does not matter here ...




I'm an Ametican voter sweety.

My opinion most certainly matters.




posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: tinner07

She was giving an interview saying that Trump needs to be impeached a few weeks after he got in.

trump asked if he could pardon himself too right? like right when he got in?


I am pretty sure if Trump said that it was just a joke.


Trump isn't allowed to joke.

It's an abuse of power and should be impeached for it too.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:41 PM
link   
a reply to: infolurker

Yep.

Stanford Law School professor Pamela Karlan, one of three witnesses called by Democrats to testify on the first day of the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry, once admitted to despising President Donald Trump so much that she crossed the street rather than walk by one of his hotels.

LINK

Neutral witness? LMAO...nope, just a triggered, arrogant snowflake with an impressive job title.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 03:43 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

That # is small.

Crossing the street because she didn't want to walk by a building.




new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join