It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pofessor At Nadler's Circus Show States Shipshod Impeachment Effort Is WRONG

page: 2
44
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:20 PM
link   
I suspect but don't know for a fact that these professors are being called to "testify" in order to give Schiff a way out of his silly circus.

"Hey, the experts said don't do it, who are we to disagree?"

Seriously, why would they call these particular experts without vetting their testimony before hand?




posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Congressional term limits.

Ending Congressionial immunity is a precedent this country desperately needs.
edit on 4-12-2019 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: LanceCorvette


Seriously, why would they call these particular experts without vetting their testimony before hand?


Because if they allowed (forced to) actual experts, such as Hunter Biden and Schiff, it would unravel all the good work they've been doing subverting the nation, to date - can't have that therefore televise the clown show.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: LanceCorvette

From what I understand, there were 4 lawyers who testified today.

All 4 are Never-Trump people.

At least 3 of them give to leftist causes, donated to Hillary, Obama, etc.

The 4th guy, while he does not like Trump, gives the impression that Nadler is being "fair".

All of this has been rehearsed beforehand. They actually had a "mock" session yesterday to actually rehearse.

It's a show.

No more real than Star Trek.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




It's a show.


Dancing with the Schills?




posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:34 PM
link   
I don't mind their contributions on a historic or academic level on the impeachment process.
I do take offense at them offering their opinions as to evidence or lack there of and attempting to influence on a personal level.
We get it, impeachment is purely political, and the house majority can do as they wish.
House dems by all means impeach with out an actual crime.
I triple dog dare you.

And yet they will still act surprised the morning after the next presidential election at the result.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:36 PM
link   


House dems by all means impeach with out an actual crime.


That's what I'm upset the most about.

We could have gotten rid of the last prez this way.

See precedents.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny


Pamela Karlan is an "unashamed" leftest hack.

www.nytimes.com...
October 10, 2013 6:18 PM
www.nationalreview.com...




Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan is a favorite candidate of the Left for a Supreme Court seat, in large part because (as this 2009 New York Times article put it) the Left “hungers for a full-throated, unapologetic liberal torchbearer.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: LanceCorvette
I suspect but don't know for a fact that these professors are being called to "testify" in order to give Schiff a way out of his silly circus.

"Hey, the experts said don't do it, who are we to disagree?"

Seriously, why would they call these particular experts without vetting their testimony before hand?


The only one who was against the impeachment was Turley. The other 3 were very clear that Trump had committed a criminal offense that warrants his impeachment.

So, you are wrong.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96



House dems by all means impeach with out an actual crime.


That's what I'm upset the most about.

We could have gotten rid of the last prez this way.

See precedents.

harry reid sends his regards



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96



House dems by all means impeach with out an actual crime.


That's what I'm upset the most about.

We could have gotten rid of the last prez this way.

See precedents.


Yes, just wait and see what happens should a Dem ever be elected into office again. Good luck with that Dems.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:42 PM
link   
Birthers had more meat and potato's than Russia and ukraine.


edit on 4-12-2019 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Birthers had more meat and potatos than Russa and ukraine.



100%



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:49 PM
link   


We've heard the same snip about Russia,Climate change, and Gun violence.

Give it up.

We're not buying the snip anymore.


What is the snip? Trump admitted to everything he is being impeached for. Yes or No?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: toolgal462

originally posted by: LanceCorvette
I suspect but don't know for a fact that these professors are being called to "testify" in order to give Schiff a way out of his silly circus.

"Hey, the experts said don't do it, who are we to disagree?"

Seriously, why would they call these particular experts without vetting their testimony before hand?


The only one who was against the impeachment was Turley. The other 3 were very clear that Trump had committed a criminal offense that warrants his impeachment.

So, you are wrong.


The other three referenced reading the transcripts of the second and third-hand "witness" testimony. That is what they are basing their judgments upon. So, now we are to believe 4th-hand opinions based upon 3rd-hand sources? And an "appeal to authority" because they are "scholars" is irrelevant when the "facts" they proclaim are anything but facts, and only presumptions and opinions based upon hearsay and "feelz".


Really??? Seriously?



Wow....just....wow.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:51 PM
link   


She was giving an interview saying that Trump needs to be impeached a few weeks after he got in.

As were the other two lawyers...lol

When they weren't commentators on CNN or NBC.

I kid you not... you should see the background on those "experts".

Turley had it right.
a reply to: Lumenari

Like you say.. your opinion does not matter... so why dont you just stop posting please.

have to sigh and face palm....


edit on 4-12-2019 by tinner07 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07

What crime did Trump admit to?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: tinner07

I want NOTHING.

There was NO QUID PRO.

Unless your talkin about Mr. Malarkey.
edit on 4-12-2019 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: toolgal462

originally posted by: LanceCorvette
I suspect but don't know for a fact that these professors are being called to "testify" in order to give Schiff a way out of his silly circus.

"Hey, the experts said don't do it, who are we to disagree?"

Seriously, why would they call these particular experts without vetting their testimony before hand?


The only one who was against the impeachment was Turley. The other 3 were very clear that Trump had committed a criminal offense that warrants his impeachment.

So, you are wrong.


The other three referenced reading the transcripts of the second and third-hand "witness" testimony. That is what they are basing their judgments upon. So, now we are to believe 4th-hand opinions based upon 3rd-hand sources? And an "appeal to authority" because they are "scholars" is irrelevant when the "facts" they proclaim are anything but facts, and only presumptions and opinions based upon hearsay and "feelz".


Really??? Seriously?



Wow....just....wow.




I'm just clarifying what they stated in their testimony. I sure as hell didn't say that I agreed with them.
edit on 4-12-2019 by toolgal462 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: tinner07

What crime did Trump admit to?


Winning.



new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join