It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Author Claims Asteroid WILL hit Earth in 2029

page: 1
15
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:30 AM
link   
The Cliffs Notes version is that Christian author Tom Horn claims to have had a vision that the Asteroid Apophis, predicted to come near Earth in 2029, in fact WILL hit the Earth, and that NASA is covering up the fact that they know this as well.

Some background: Mr. Horn accurately prophesied that Pope Benedict would resign. He was universally laughed at, yet the prediction came true.

Now he says he is "more sure" of the asteroid prediction than he was of the Pope Benedict prophecy.

Mr. Horn has just released a book called The Wormwood Prophecy where he goes into detail about this.

I received my book in the mail, but I have not had a chance to read it yet.

Of interest is this podcast where he goes into considerable detail about the predicted event:

Hagmann report podcast

I realize it's two hours long, but you can skip the irrelevant banter and the promotional stuff.

I have listened to it three times now, and it's worth hearing.

My take: I can't say whether Mr. Horn is actually a prophet or a kook; however, he claims to have had contact with some NASA insiders. He claims they are hiding the fact that the asteroid WILL likely hit the Earth, probably in 2029, and that it will not be a "near miss."

I say there's "enough there" for me to put an asterisk by this predicted event, and to at least "watch it" for developments.




edit on 4-12-2019 by DrogoTheNorman because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-12-2019 by DrogoTheNorman because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:34 AM
link   
About time we get a prediction that's far enough out for mankind to do something!

Let's use a super-nuke on it, while it's years away.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: DrogoTheNorman

Wormwood... as in... absinthe?

And he's on a book tour?

I dunno man...



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:35 AM
link   
a reply to: DrogoTheNorman



Mr. Horn has just released a book called The Wormwood Prophecy where he goes into detail about this.


Did it possibly cross your mind that perhaps he is using this "prophecy" to pump his book sales?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:37 AM
link   
All I can say, is, listen to the podcast, or read the book, then tell me what you think.

I clicked on the Hagmann report link I posted thinking it was just another "End Times" Christian book written to make money, but now I am convinced it's a subject that is at least worth looking into further.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:42 AM
link   
NASA is not the only space agency on Earth, nor is it the only agency capable of plotting, with a high degree of accuracy, the orbit of a passing celestial body.

Therefore, even if Mr. Horn’s vision of an Earth impact in 2029 was a valid precognition, there would be many, many more people currently aware of the impending threat.

And so, it is highly unlikely that “the secret” would still be a secret.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: DrogoTheNorman

Ooooh, fresh doom porn — that we have a full decade to marinate on. Where’s the popcorn?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Bhadhidar
NASA is not the only space agency on Earth, nor is it the only agency capable of plotting, with a high degree of accuracy, the orbit of a passing celestial body.

Therefore, even if Mr. Horn’s vision of an Earth impact in 2029 was a valid precognition, there would be many, many more people currently aware of the impending threat.

And so, it is highly unlikely that “the secret” would still be a secret.


Unless they are colluding together to keep it a secret because they know it would cause a worldwide panic. I believe that is one of the assertions Mr. Horn makes.

Listen to the podcast.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:50 AM
link   
Look, I'm all on board for getting taken out before I become incontinent and have to wear "Depends", but less than 10 years from now? That's a little too close for comfort.

I hate to give attention to psychic-y people, but there's this, saying that we could probably get hit around the same time frame: (and this article is 19 years old)

www.theguardian.com...

On the bright side however, we could look at it this way: Nostradamus says we won't officially be *Wiped Out* until the late 3000's

www.history.com...
edit on 4-12-2019 by dothedew because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:52 AM
link   
a reply to: DrogoTheNorman

That Aileen Wuornos was full of #, man... She said we'd all be killed by an asteroid in 2019. She was a decade off.

I'm curious... I wonder what would happen if an asteroid hit smack dab in the middle of Antarctica.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Bhadhidar

Do you think NASA would tell us if there was a threat like that? They stick to things they can make money off of, like "global warming"...



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 10:59 AM
link   
Any way to move this up by ten years?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:00 AM
link   
I'm done with these doomsday things. The Mayans had their chance in 2012 and they blew it!



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:01 AM
link   
a reply to: DrogoTheNorman

This is why I know that it is all bunk.

If an asteroid was heading for earth and we did have this much notice, elements within our own government would use this to stoke fears and concerns but also use it to raise taxes, limit freedoms, grow the size and scope of government.

Fact is, they aren't.

They have no problem saying the climate will be gone in a decade if we don't raise taxes, limit freedoms, grow the size and scope of government, so I'm going to have to say, "No."

This guy just wants to sell books.


EDIT: someone beat me to it.

edit on 4-12-2019 by DBCowboy because: I drank all of Augustus's beer. . . come at me bro!



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Bhadhidar

Do you think NASA would tell us if there was a threat like that? They stick to things they can make money off of, like "global warming"...


NASA has a reputation for concealing data. I've been told jokingly that NASA stands for 'Never A Straight Answer'.

Look back to the Columbia disaster: There is NO WAY that NASA did not know that space shuttle was going to burn up in the atmosphere, yet as far as anyone knows they never admitted to it beforehand.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:03 AM
link   
Sweet! Now we can get 10 years of Elenin-style doom porn!



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: DrogoTheNorman

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Bhadhidar

Do you think NASA would tell us if there was a threat like that? They stick to things they can make money off of, like "global warming"...


NASA has a reputation for concealing data. I've been told jokingly that NASA stands for 'Never A Straight Answer'.

Look back to the Columbia disaster: There is NO WAY that NASA did not know that space shuttle was going to burn up in the atmosphere, yet as far as anyone knows they never admitted to it beforehand.


That's the perfect words for their moniker, lol... Yeah you're right about Columbia, they put that mission off many times over several months and finally got tired of the questions and launched. They knew those rings weren't gonna do the trick.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:12 AM
link   
Nine years? I can live with that, thanks for the heads up



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: DrogoTheNorman

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Bhadhidar

Do you think NASA would tell us if there was a threat like that? They stick to things they can make money off of, like "global warming"...


NASA has a reputation for concealing data. I've been told jokingly that NASA stands for 'Never A Straight Answer'.

Look back to the Columbia disaster: There is NO WAY that NASA did not know that space shuttle was going to burn up in the atmosphere, yet as far as anyone knows they never admitted to it beforehand.


I find that the idea that "NASA has a reputation for concealing data" an interesting one.

Exactly what data has it concealed?

I can understand that they might have individual researchers who have falsified scientific data to gain notoriety or kudos, that's a problem that all scientific organizations have. I also understand that they may have political agendas because their funding is dependent on the government.

But, I think that they have been very open about most of their failures and embarrassments. So I can't see any secret agenda nor can I see any systematic withholding of data.

And, as others have mentioned, they aren't the only scientific or astronomical organization in the world. If their scientists missed publishing "the paper of the century" then every other scientist doing the same work would get in first (as often happens).

So, the idea that NASA (only one country's space science organization) would be concealing data is not supported by evidence, nor by reasoning. It is strange that people hold such ideas in the face of that.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: DrogoTheNorman
You lost me at 'promotional stuff'



new topics

top topics



 
15
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join