It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Solomon's reporting was so blindingly bias that even The Hill fired him because he couldn't be impartial.
Meanwhile, Trump has, allegedly, used the power of the Presidency in an attempt to suppress a political rival.
So when you say that he's being attacked for telling the truth, what you actually mean is that he's being attacked for stating a narrative you like.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: neo96
I'm saying that even before Biden announced his candidacy he was the front runner and Trump's biggest threat.
And while I agree what the DNC is shady, in all honesty they were smarter how they went about things. First off, it wasn't Hillary that hired Fusion. Hell, it wasn't even the DNC. It was a law firm hired by the DNC.
Meanwhile, Trump has, allegedly, used the power of the Presidency in an attempt to suppress a political rival.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Krakatoa
Except Trump didn't ask for an investigation. All he wanted was an announcement of an investigation on American media.
If Trump actually cared about corruption why didn't he make these demands earlier in his Presidency? Why did he wait until a time when he knew Biden would be his biggest rival?
And that's before we get into our bigger issues of corruption that Trump ignores. Let's not forget all those people named in the Panama Papers.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Byrd
wow
why do you need to see the warrant?
mkay
so then spying on your political opponent is now fair game?
the days we live in
What will a warrant tell you? How familiar are you with criminal law? Could you tell on what grounds a search might be deemed illegal under law and which laws apply?
If you aren't a lawyer, asking to see a warrant is a little like asking to see the proof of the C parameter in this paper: link.springer.com... (in other words, the non-specialist reader can't tell if it's valid or not.)
In this age of noise and division, if you really want to see the warrant and if it's legal, contact a real lawyer (like the youtube channel, Legal Eagles) and ask them for an opinion.
Don't rely on an ATS member's ability to tell if it's legal or not... that was my point.
Except Trump didn't ask for an investigation.
I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it.
The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.
originally posted by: lakenheath24
I had to check out the cow ref but jrezus..dude is a white male version ofMaxinne Carr. Aka..retard
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Byrd
Politicians HAD been operating under the idea that they could do what they liked and that power and money protected them. They are beginning to see that this is no longer true.
I'm hoping to see this become truth.
I'm hoping to see the system work as it was meant to.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
There is indication that President ''X'' has solicited a foreign nation to dig up dirt on a political rival. Should we look into that possiblity or just ask President ''X'' if it is true or not?
There is indication that a loyal congressional teammate of President ''X'' has also worked to dig up dirt on a political rival of his boss, President ''X''. Should we look into that possibility or just ask President ''X'' and his crony if it is true or not?
originally posted by: network dude
so if we question it's legality with a lawyer, and see if attorney client privilege was breached, that's cool with you, right?