A new progressive idea that families must be abolished to create social and economic equality

a reply to: sine.nomine

It's really not about children, nor is it about "equality", it's about centralizing power, and increasing the size and scope of government.

yep, that's actually the same old trick from the Garden.....nothing changes except time is out for wickedness in high places

can ya feel it.....

a reply to: DBCowboy

OH GREAT JOB! You mansplained all that to your kid?

Just kidding, That's great to hear actually most people won't admit to that … you know being a responsible parent. I don't have kids, I was told years ago that the planet would be uninhabitable in ten years, and I thought; "why would anyone want a kid in this day and age when these idiots are pushing this stupid agenda?"

a reply to: Guyfriday

I want my kids to be better more successful than me.

I thought all parents would want that.

(then I met my in-laws )

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: sine.nomine

It's really not about children, nor is it about "equality", it's about centralizing power, and increasing the size and scope of government.

In a Synarchist government an elite group of citizens make all the rules for the masses. While the idea of Communism is everyone's first thought when they hear this, it really isn't about the state either. It's all about appeasing those elites that make the rules for the masses. Any time the S/T (Synarchist/Trotskyists) can take anything away from the average person, and then use that item as a gift for doing what they want, it's a loss for all people. That's all this is, I'm sure we will all be hearing about handing your kids over to the "State" is the best way to prevent climate change deaths soon.

a reply to: Lumenari
Heck, this idea was prevalent in Sparta. It didn't end well for them either, due to having a horribly low birth rate, and then being in constant war with their own slaves.

a reply to: sine.nomine

You're right though... I really don't get it... And that makes me "backwoods" I guess. I'm genuinely curious at the thought process behind this all. Are they that disconnected? Seriously. Help me understand. Is it a city thing?

It's a victim class thing.

If you are taught that you are being held back because of (insert sexuality, skin color, culture, anything else here) and there is nothing you can do about it....

But there is an ideology that can "save" you from that and the only thing that will save you is to vote for that ideology...

Then eventually that ideology can own you and take care of you and make everything "fair".

It's a way to sell socialism/communism/progressivism to the unwashed masses.

It's what Marx taught as a way to turn capitalism into socialism and then eventually communism.

For the children, of course.

originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: The2Billies

I can't understand how these idiots haven't bred out yet. Is there any way we can help? Mandatory sterilizations for any man who calls himself a feminist and any woman with blue or green hair?

I concur with your assessment and echo your "concern" to assist.

However, I must totally disagree with both your characterization/criteria and your proposed methods.

Blue or green hair is fine (depending on length) and claiming to be a feminist (Billy Dee Williams) is way different than dressing/acting/claiming-gender-preference-as a biological female. Not proposing new criteria, illustrative comment only.

Mandatory sterilization is a no-go unless criminal activity is involved. With patient attention to triggering points, the entire genre may be encouraged to "incel" themselves into extinction out of despair for their self-inflicted POV...

ganjoa

This fits nicely into the program comrades and covers party goals #40 and #41.

The 45 Declared Goals For The Communist Takeover Of America

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

By following the advice of our some of our great leaders, like Carl Marx and Antonio Gramsci, we are having success in increasing our party's influence in the most decadent of capitalist nations, The United States. We have accomplished most of our goals and are increasing our control over the people, the institutions, and the government of this keystone country of western capitalism. I give my congratulations and deepest thanks to all our comrades and the tactics they employed moving forward to victory.

Disclaimer: This is my gratuitous commie ass kissing, in case they take over. Better red than dead? Right?

This will surely result in war!

a reply to: The2Billies

Does this type of thinking frighten you, or do you think it is the only way to end "nuclear family privilege"?

It does not truly. The proposition is so outrageous it's not even worth my minute. Good luck to the proposers with that one.

edit:

Now reading your sentence again...it sort off implies that you think that nuclear family has some sort of "privilege"...that needs to be dismantled ?

These ideas don't just randomly insert themselves into our societies.

WHO is injecting this poison?

I don't even care about the why.

some creeps just dont get it.

Without family, there is no civilized society. END OF STORY.

a reply to: The2Billies

So I should sometimes feel guilty I am a good parent. How can the left see this and think it makes sense?

a reply to: ganjoa

Hey, fair enough. As long as they breed out and stop propagating forward in time, I'm cool with it.

For the record, I read to both my kids every night and played music for them every day, so I'm like -- the worst. Or whatever. I don't give a Schiff about what any of these people think of us or our privlidge.

It's worth reading the entire article about Swift and his philosophy if you wish to "deny ignorance."

www.abc.net.au...

‘Nearly everyone who has thought about this would conclude that it is a really bad idea to be raised by state institutions, unless something has gone wrong,’ he says. (Swift)

The context lost between the two is that Swift is defending both families AND reading to children and pointing out that children raised in loving families by (a) parent(s) who read to them are "advantaged" over children who are not is not an argument for parental guilt trips or state-raised chickens.

Not to get in the way of a fun thread, obvs.

a reply to: The2Billies

It's far from a new idea, but the message seems lost due
to the average American memory span being about eight
minutes past the exam completion. You are unfortunately
what's been fed you from childhood. [fork stick HERE]

I'm beginning to wonder which is more dangerous: a barely
passing grade in Mechanical Elements, or a sparkler in
Behavioral Analysis toward a Political Science sheepskin.

On second thought--- the damage level may be quite similar.
But I'd still take my immediate chances driving across a badly
designed bridge than give a child's brain to our present crop
of social engineers. Seen the results of the latter 50+ years...

This is effed up. When/If I have kids, reading... well more performing for them, that monotone reading stuff is for losers... is one of the things I look most forward to with my kids.

I'm a dungeon master, and my best talent as a dungeon master is my wit and character acting. Any game I run or play will be exciting, funny and have memorable characters. I intend to apply those skills at bed time reading for my kids. Slowly inserting branches choices for the characters into the stories and teaching creativity and the ideas of actions and consequences.

Do I think these actions will help my child grow to be a better person, more creative and understanding of the world and decision making? That such may be an advantage over other kids, either neglected by their parents, or less able parents in this regard? Sure, but that's the whole damn #ing point!!! That's one's job as a parent, to do the best they can, with what they have, to prepare their child for the world, and make sure they have the best tools available to make the best decisions.

I most certainly WILL NOT purposely handicap my child, and not prepare them to the best of my ability, simply for the FEELS and sense of equality of a bunch of lazy asshats with no desire to fortify their children for the world.

Neglect your children at your own peril, I will not do so, no matter who demands it.

I'm with others, I'd rather not have children than have them born into a world and raised like a baby monkey with a wire parent.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
These ideas don't just randomly insert themselves into our societies.

WHO is injecting this poison?

I don't even care about the why.

Yeah, the why of it starts to get "sticky" in the general debate - but if you've got WHO, there's a pretty good chance an answer can be determined empirically.

ganjoa

a reply to: Puppylove

I don't think they are saying you shouldn't, I think they are saying you should feel guilty about it. Much like you should feel guilty for being white.