It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Barr Disputes IG Horowitz Findings

page: 8
29
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:14 AM
link   
a reply to: mtnshredder



BTW, where is Chucky Schumer nowadays? I haven’t seen hide or hair of him for awhile.


That's good news please don't jinx it.





posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

I'm not playing this game with you anymore.
You just pretend it said something other than what it actually said.
If you can't admit that there is no intelligent discussion here.
Good bye.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

See the issue here???
It is not a belief. Its facts.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme




there is no intelligent discussion here.


hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaah
hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahaa

oh boy

ahahaahahahahahahah



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme




You just pretend it said something other than what it actually said.
If you can't admit that there is no intelligent discussion here.


Pot meet kettle.



(post by shooterbrody removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: shooterbrody
hahahaha
they all expect us to have forgotten the fisa in question was TWICE DENIED before the dossier was added

so no dossier no fisa warrant

this is not hard
fraud upon the court at least
civil rights violations on the monitored
all for political gain by the obama administrion



we will see
tho it is funny seeing some here pretend this is not trod over ground



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
"If he had found something worth pursuing, he would have said something like "I have found the following instances of collusion, and the following instances of obstructions of justice". He didn't, because he didn't find any. "

The report did just that, it listed instances of collusion.

No. It didn't. That is just your TDS showing. Get help.


However, collusion is not a crime.

I know. We've been saying that ever since the TDS suffering demwits and their MSM lackeys started shouting about collusion 24/7 for 2 years.


It also cited several instances of attempted conspiracy.

No. It didn't. That is just your TDS showing. Get help.


The report enumerated no less than 10 instances of obstruction of justice,

No. It didn't. That is just your TDS showing. Get help.

It did outline 10 instances of potential obstruction, but Mueller didn't make a determination, leaving that to his boss, the AG, who rightly said his actions didn't rise to the level of obstruction. PERIOD.


that Mueller referred to Congress,

No. He didn't. That was not his job, nor was it an option for him. He didn't report to Congress. According to Statute, when he was done, he submitted his report to his boss, the AG, who then made any and all final determinations. PERIOD.

He could have made all the recommendations he wanted.


because as he explained, the DOJ can't indict a sitting president.

Irrelevant. First, that is not a law, it is merely a DOJ opinion that has never been tested. Second, as I said, he could have stated in plain and simple terms:

"These are the crimes committed by the President:

a) blah

b) blahblah

etc"

Nothing whatsoever prevented him from doing that - except that he didn't find anything, so he wrote a gobbledygook report giving the demwits enough to try to continue on to the nest step, impeachment.

So... hows that working out for ya?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
"more do nothing from the do nothing dems "

The House passed dozens, if not hundreds of bills, that are sitting on Mitch McConnell's, the "Grim Reaper, desk.

Yes, all a bunch of socialist/communist 'malarkey' that they passed for show and knew didn't stand a chance of passage in the Senate.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 07:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Agit8dChop

I'm not playing this game with you anymore.
You just pretend it said something other than what it actually said.
If you can't admit that there is no intelligent discussion here.
Good bye.

Bye. It is no one's fault but your own you can't handle Mueller said the opposite of what you claim.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 08:09 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:03 AM
link   
YOU WERE WARNED!

There have now been penalties assessed for both Political Trolling and Manners. Fair warning: Staff can remove posts faster than you can type them out.

The penalties will continue as long as the personal insults and snide political remarks continue, and can easily lead to issues with accounts. If necessary, this thread will be closed. You have now been warned TWICE.


Do not reply to this message.

TheRedneck
ATS Forum Moderator/Member



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: mtnshredder
BTW, where is Chucky Schumer nowadays? I haven’t seen hide or hair of him for awhile. Did he say screw this circus and run off and hibernate? It’s almost like he wants no part in it, IDK?


When the leaders go quiet, they're planning something. I remember people asking why Schiff seemingly disappeared over the Summer.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: mtnshredder
BTW, where is Chucky Schumer nowadays? I haven’t seen hide or hair of him for awhile. Did he say screw this circus and run off and hibernate? It’s almost like he wants no part in it, IDK?


When the leaders go quiet, they're planning something. I remember people asking why Schiff seemingly disappeared over the Summer.

Kind of like a toddler that gets real quiet for to long, it’s never good. LOL.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   
And remember the "John Durham Report" hasn't even come out yet. That list is sure to grow.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: shooterbrody
hahahaha
they all expect us to have forgotten the fisa in question was TWICE DENIED before the dossier was added

so no dossier no fisa warrant

this is not hard
fraud upon the court at least
civil rights violations on the monitored
all for political gain by the obama administrion



we will see
tho it is funny seeing some here pretend this is not trod over ground



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 11:59 AM
link   
And remember the "John Durham Report" hasn't even come out yet. That list is sure to grow.


originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: shooterbrody
hahahaha
they all expect us to have forgotten the fisa in question was TWICE DENIED before the dossier was added

so no dossier no fisa warrant

this is not hard
fraud upon the court at least
civil rights violations on the monitored
all for political gain by the obama administrion





posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
And remember the "John Durham Report" hasn't even come out yet. That list is sure to grow.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: shooterbrody
hahahaha
they all expect us to have forgotten the fisa in question was TWICE DENIED before the dossier was added

so no dossier no fisa warrant

this is not hard
fraud upon the court at least
civil rights violations on the monitored
all for political gain by the obama administrion



we will see
tho it is funny seeing some here pretend this is not trod over ground

I think it will be some time before we see anything officially from Durham
I think there are some things that will be exposed on the 9th, but may not be followed through with as was done previously



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 01:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
You really can't make this # up.

You measn like you just did? Since the report isn't released yet, thats all you're doing is making # up.



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 04:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Wardaddy454




I'm confused, and maybe you and Sookie can help me out here, but where does this fit in with the Mueller report stating that no American was involved with collusion?


It doesn't say that. The report cites numerous examples of "collusion", but collusion is not a crime. It also cites several examples of attempted conspiracy, but claims that the parties in involved, like Don Jr, Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort were too dumb to successfully pull it off.

Mueller claimed that no American was found to have successfully conspired with Russia to influence the election.


www.justice.gov...

Page 14 paragraph 3.

The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operation.


And with what you've stated, where is the crime?



posted on Dec, 4 2019 @ 04:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

All that says is that the Trump campaign didn't participate in the hacking or distribution of the DNC documents.

I already said that collusion isn't a crime. I keep emphasizing that because posters, including yourself keep mentioning "collusion".

Mueller did cite several examples of Trump campaign members attempts to conspire, like the Trump Tower meeting, Jared Kushner's secret back channels and Paul Manafort's poll data shenanigans.

The report stated that the Trump campaign and Trump himself benefited, welcomed and invited Russia's help in their campaign. The report also stated that only Congress can determine the intent, when it comes to Trump's acts of obstruction.




top topics



 
29
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join