originally posted by: DustDoses
a reply to: Apoceclipse
Love this post, great job man...
However, while there is no questioning the reality of project MKUltra, ultimately, experiments in mind control were wildly unpredictable, and the
results nearly impossible to reproduce.
The idea was scrapped, and at the end of the day, there is simply no evidence for a Jason Bourne type super soldier, or a person free of agency.
There we go, this is the comment I was looking for. I would have to say that I strongly disagree, as this is the specific area I have experience in,
and why I am here.
This subject tends to stem into several areas, but I am in fact focusing the matter to one specific area, which happens to be that which you cast a
shadow on with your statement. Although some of my future writing will span a slightly wider range to give context, it will focus on these sleeper
assets that some would in fact deem 'sleeper/assassin/'super soldiers' if you will. Although I think the term 'super soldier' is a bit
comic-book-esque, I think we all can understand the concept - a highly trained, highly motivated person, devoid of fear, and ethic/moral qualms. One
who puts 100% into a specific task, operates in the most effecient manner possible, without worry of self harm, or even collateral damage, so long as
that will not infringe on staying within the parameters/guidelines of a mission, nor risk exposure. In fact, collateral damage may not be so accurate
of a term as it often goes hand in hand with exposure prevention, and will be required. This person ('s/actions) may or may not be further
enhanced/augmented in several ways... from drugs and 'hypnotically induced' metal states, to implants that secrete chemicals and/or help produce
certain hormones etc, to implants that provide electrical/mental stimulation in varying manners.
While I understand you may not be privvy to the evidence, there is in fact plenty, just not disclosed in the same manner as old. This is due to a a
few simple reasons. A couple main things are:
Disclosure: Involved parties, specifically of the academic/scientific community have been a little more motivated to keep a lid on it, and learned the
importance of not leaking information. In part, due to blowback from the public/perception/opinion of past disclosures - not only from those of a
personal nature, but the general declassification and subsequent dissection of info as well. In part, due to much harsher consequences from those
directly involved in program oversight. It is simply unacceptable for anything about this to come out at all, and the penalty has been known to be
Procedure: Although research and revision are ongoing, they are no longer the primary objective, as now there is a somewhat standardized 'formula' in
place. One that is very effecient. This is not to say failure rates are not high, but grooming and cover-up protocols are well in place to prevent
disclosure. Do note, the formula is one that is primarily separated/layered away from the direct oversight, and is designed to be as self
sufficient/self replicating as possible - which we will delve into.
I thank you for the motivation bringing me back to write more.
Take for example, on going 'special operations and operators' of a classified nature. These operators identities and missions are kept
secret/classified from the public, and almost never leaked. This is the area these assets we discuss are most frequently used in, so to argue that
these 'sleeper/SS assets' are not in existence, due to lack of evidence, is a bit naive, as this goes hand in hand with other 'special/black
operations' around the globe, which indeed are kept classified and secret from the public.
Tell me the identities and training of the military intelligence elite field operatives... do you have this info? Of course not. Several of these
operators are in fact dissociative assets... which serves dual purposes in cover-up, and these parties make the best sleepers as well. In their down
time, they can be activated for domestic (or otherwise) intelligence missions, and due to their life experience - heavy drinking, horrible dreams are
already common, and secrecy is of their nature. They may think a mission they were activated for was just a bad dream, it could easily become a blur,
and they are already constantly monitored for their 'normal' classified involvement in operations. This along with tunnel vision, and a fast pace
forward, as well as being on call 24/7 where they will have to drop everything from their personal life in an instant (and will be called out if they
are getting 'too close') serves to prevent self discovery and disclosure. If need be, the powers that be may send them on a 'suicide mission' as they
veer towards being a liability. I have seen it happen.
I am not here to discuss the possibility of involvement in mass manipulation, or the involvement of assets possible being used in some of these
mass/school shootings, or anything of that nature, to be clear. I will stay away from that specific subject matter in general. What I will go into is
the following (rough framework, this writing is not planned or formatted ahead of time):
- Asset Selection
- Asset Acquisition
- Asset Routing
- Asset Retainment
- Grooming Phases
- Making the Cut (or Washing Out)
- Self Sufficiency
- Plausible Deniability
- Disclosure Prevention
- Disclosure Twisting/Smearing
I am sure I will slightly rearrange the above, and/or add to, but that is the rough framework I will go into, as general topics to give the readers