It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

OMB Reveals WHY President Trump Delayed Release of Ukraine Military Aid.

page: 3
38
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66



The funds were restricted on the day of the July 25 call between Trump and Zelensky. I’m sure that’s a coincidence.


Incorrect. That's the day the paperwork was filed. It had been on hold since the beginning of july.




posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Gryphon66



The funds were restricted on the day of the July 25 call between Trump and Zelensky. I’m sure that’s a coincidence.


Incorrect. That's the day the paperwork was filed. It had been on hold since the beginning of july.


Source?



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

You said on more than one occassion Impeachment is purely a poltical process.

IS what SChiff and his party doing for the benefit of the UNITED STATES OF America?

Or the most corrupt party in this country?



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Fake news CNN




A hold was placed on the Ukraine aid at the beginning of July, and the agencies were notified at a July 18 meeting that it had been frozen at the direction of the President, a week before the Trump-Zelensky call.

edit on 27-11-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:21 AM
link   
No person that actually believes in Truth,Justice, and the American way of fairness.

Would support impeaching a sitting president based off a clearly rigged kangaroo court.

Not real Americans anyway.



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Gryphon66

Fake news CNN




A hold was placed on the Ukraine aid at the beginning of July, and the agencies were notified at a July 18 meeting that it had been frozen at the direction of the President, a week before the Trump-Zelensky call.


Thanks. That wasn’t made clear in the Fake News Breitbart screed.



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:33 AM
link   
If this guy had such damning tesitmony why didn't he publically appear?


edit on 27-11-2019 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:41 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

You forgot to cap-lock that sentence...


Peace



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 07:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Source?

How in the world do you quote from the original posted article in one comment yet still miss the answer to your question within the first two to three paragraphs of the same source?



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined

How in the world do you quote from the original posted article in one comment yet still miss the answer to your question within the first two to three paragraphs of the same source?


Hmmm. I quoted CNN? I don't think so.
edit on 27-11-2019 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
No person that actually believes in Truth,Justice, and the American way of fairness.

Would support impeaching a sitting president based off a clearly rigged kangaroo court.

Not real Americans anyway.


Funny, I think real Americans have different ideas about politics.



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Not really.

Republicans had to storm D's secret bunker meetings.

Republicans had their arms tied behind their back and were not allowed to call anyone.

And buried depositions.

It's really funny that if this SNIP was in the best interest of the United States there would have been EQUAL representation during the process.

Since we elect TWO SIDES to represent us.

I'll say it again.

No REAL AMERICAN would support that soviet style SNIP.
edit on 27-11-2019 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:48 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Those hearings were limited to members of the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight and Reform committees, which have jurisdiction over the impeachment investigations...are you implying only democrats are in these committees?

Peace



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

So beside being a witch, you are now a mind reader as well????


"Then trump thought oh a new president that I can possibly manipulate lets see what we got to accomplish that.. "

Exactly how do you know what Trump was thinking??? Please tell us.
edit on 27-11-2019 by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


Hmmm. I quoted CNN? I don't think so.


My mistake, butI guess you just didn't take the time to read the article in the original post.


edit on 27-11-2019 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:52 AM
link   
a reply to: operation mindcrime


Those hearings were limited to members of the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight and Reform committees, which have jurisdiction over the impeachment investigations...are you implying only democrats are in these committees?


Yeah, why wasn't anyone on the Judiciary Committee invited and were turned away instead? The Judiciary Committee is the one that's standard for holding these types of hearings in the past.





edit on 27-11-2019 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:53 AM
link   
a reply to: operation mindcrime

What this guy said.



Republicans have repeatedly blasted Democrats for choosing to only allow members of the House Intelligence, Oversight and Foreign Affairs committees to attend the hearings and depositions, arguing the information and transcripts should be made available to all members given the gravity of the consequences of impeachment.


That's called stacking the deck



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:56 AM
link   
And today we find out information WAS WITHHELD.

Seems Republicans concerns were validated.



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:58 AM
link   
In a real court of LAW.

They call that discovery.



posted on Nov, 27 2019 @ 08:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Deetermined

In fact I did, sadly Breitbart like CNN is partisan news.




top topics



 
38
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join