The President Opened the Can

Not to meddle in military justice.

Looks like it needs to be meddle in when false charges are being levied against innocent soldiers, and giving immunity to the who done it.

a reply to: neo96

I missed nothing.

Why did you cut your quote at a comma? Must be something else there, huh?

Could it be the fact that this solider was convicted of posing with a dead enemies body?

Yep.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Keep trolling man.

a reply to: neo96

Yeah, you and Trump know more than this soldiers teammates and chain-of-command.

I'll take the word of the guys in the field.

a reply to: neo96

Trolling? Pfft

You cut the quote dishonestly.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Should be taking the word of the jury that aquitted the guy on

Predmeditated murder,attempted murder,obstruction of justice.

Which were proven to be false.

But who cares about malicious prosecution amiright?

a reply to: Annee

Honestly ... Seeing what the gang misrepresents and misunderstands every day, I'm sure you're about as concerned as I am where you fit on their little spectrum.

Considered the sources found them utterly lacking.

a reply to: neo96

You mean the seven man jury that found him guilty on the count of disgracing the uniform by posing with a fallen enemy like a schoolboy?

That jury ?

a reply to: Gryphon66

Disgracing the uniform?

Like prosecuting an innocent guy and giving immunity to the other that did the deed.

Yeah that's a disgrace.

a reply to: neo96

Glad you understand finally.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Annee

Honestly ... Seeing what the gang misrepresents and misunderstands every day, I'm sure you're about as concerned as I am where you fit on their little spectrum.

Considered the sources found them utterly lacking.

Majorly, of course

a reply to: Gryphon66

I do understand.

Someones beating a dead horse.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Deplorable

Tyrants don’t brook disagreement.

ETA: They also ignore the rule-of-law when it suits them.

Yes, they do.

Good thing she didn't make into office, eh?

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Deplorable

Tyrants don’t brook disagreement.

ETA: They also ignore the rule-of-law when it suits them.

Yes, they do.

Good thing she didn't make into office, eh?

Well, if she is Hillary, and if she’d done something like this ...

... you guys would have exploding heads, LOL.

Yeah, I do think it’s good Hillary Clinton is not President.

I don’t think the one we have is even a smidgeon better though.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Okay, your points are good, and we are more 'like minded' than not on this issue.

I really don't think any POTUS should be reaching 'down the ranks' of the military either, for anything less than the biggest of reasons … just my humble opinion. But why oh why do they all (recently especially) seem to do it ? ? ?

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Deplorable

Tyrants don’t brook disagreement.

ETA: They also ignore the rule-of-law when it suits them.

Yes, they do.

Good thing she didn't make into office, eh?

Well, if she is Hillary, and if she’d done something like this ...

... you guys would have exploding heads, LOL.

Yeah, I do think it’s good Hillary Clinton is not President.

I don’t think the one we have is even a smidgeon better though.

Is that like how you folks wouldn't bat a friggen eye to Trump Jr. getting a cushy board job in Ukraine for an oil company?

Weaksauce.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Deplorable

Tyrants don’t brook disagreement.

ETA: They also ignore the rule-of-law when it suits them.

Yes, they do.

Good thing she didn't make into office, eh?

Well, if she is Hillary, and if she’d done something like this ...

... you guys would have exploding heads, LOL.

Yeah, I do think it’s good Hillary Clinton is not President.

I don’t think the one we have is even a smidgeon better though.

Is that like how you folks wouldn't bat a friggen eye to Trump Jr. getting a cushy board job in Ukraine for an oil company?

Weaksauce.

Does Trump Jr. have the education and background for the job?

That would be my question.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Deplorable

Tyrants don’t brook disagreement.

ETA: They also ignore the rule-of-law when it suits them.

Yes, they do.

Good thing she didn't make into office, eh?

Well, if she is Hillary, and if she’d done something like this ...

... you guys would have exploding heads, LOL.

Yeah, I do think it’s good Hillary Clinton is not President.

I don’t think the one we have is even a smidgeon better though.

Is that like how you folks wouldn't bat a friggen eye to Trump Jr. getting a cushy board job in Ukraine for an oil company?

Weaksauce.

Did anyone investigate Ivanka for her many deals in China, Saudi, etc.?

Nope.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Yeah, I do think it’s good Hillary Clinton is not President.

I don’t think the one we have is even a smidgeon better though.

Yeah, thats the difference between you and me.

I have a brain, and am capable of rational, logical, independent thought.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Yeah, I do think it’s good Hillary Clinton is not President.

I don’t think the one we have is even a smidgeon better though.

Yeah, thats the difference between you and me.

I have a brain, and am capable of rational, logical, independent thought.

Really?

Perhaps we’ll get to see that sometime ...