People Briefed On IG Report DRAFT State Impending Report Will Be A Big Disappointment

a reply to: shooterbrody

People who are mentioned in the report would
have had access to it to review.

I am guessing it it one of the high ups
like Andrew McCabe or Comey that
leaked this. It takes the heat off of them
for a few weeks.

IMO of course.

a reply to: burntheships
Their portion?
Or the whole report?

a reply to: shooterbrody

I was wondering the same thing, I don't know.

I do know that McCabe signed a non disclosure
before he reviewed.

a reply to: burntheships
Hmm
So then barr will be after those who "reviewed" it for leaking?

a reply to: Phage
I certainly hope so.
The fact that the FBI's 302's, interview cards, from their interviews with Flynn have now gone missing.
This is ONE of the issues Flynn's new lawyer is using to press for dismissal of all charges.
In a real world that would work. However, as has been true through all of these issues, Pres Trump and all of the others, reality is a very abstract thought.
The bottom line in all of this is that Robert Mueller is not what he is being presented to the American people by the media.
IMHO Mueller is/was a crooked cop. But because he was using his power to protect the "RIGHT" people he is lauded and protected.

a reply to: shooterbrody

I wish.

Not sure about how any of this will play out,
except that there has been obvious political
bias in the FBI, no denying that. However,
ole Horowitz, the gate keeper at the DOJ
has repeated said he found no political bias.

SHDH

a reply to: burntheships

However,
ole Horowitz, the gate keeper at the DOJ
has repeated said he found no political bias.

Is that what he said? Or did he say that he found no evidence that political bias affected the actions of those involved?

Please clarify.

a reply to: Phage

This report isn't out yet, when it is I will
quote from it.

I am fairly certain that he has not officially
found that that Comey or McCabe "acted"
out of political bias in his past reports.

If you have an actual quote to prove that
he found they did, please by all means post it.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Phage

This report isn't out yet, when it is I will
quote from it.

But didn't you say this?

ole Horowitz, the gate keeper at the DOJ
has repeated said he found no political bias.

originally posted by: Phage
Is that what he said? Or did he say that he found no evidence that political bias affected the actions of those involved?

From the 2018 IG Report

the IG said: "We found no evidence that the conclusions by department prosecutors were affected by bias or other improper considerations; rather, we determined that they were based on the prosecutors' assessment of the facts, the law, and past department practice."

www.npr.org...


See? Just like I said....

"Gatekeeper".

I'm pretty sure that reference was from the review of the Hillary Clinton email investigations by Horowitz released last year.
So many investigations it's hard to keep up.

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Phage

This report isn't out yet, when it is I will
quote from it.

But didn't you say this?

ole Horowitz, the gate keeper at the DOJ
has repeated said he found no political bias.

a reply to: burntheships

So, he didn't say that he found no political bias. But he did say that he found no evidence that political bias affected the actions of those involved.

Thank you for answering my question. So this statement from you is not correct.

ole Horowitz, the gate keeper at the DOJ
has repeated said he found no political bias.

a reply to: Phage

So he found political bias?

Please by all means prove me wrong.
Quote from his report that he did!

Otherwise your full of hot air!

a reply to: burntheships

So he found political bias?

I don't know.
You said that he repeatedly said he found none. Can you provide an example? Shouldn't be hard if he said it repeatedly.

Horowitz says he found no affirmative evidence that Strzok skewed his decision-making for political reasons. But he says he “did not have confidence” that Strzok’s decision in the campaign’s final month to prioritize the Trump campaign/Russia probe over new Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop “was free from bias.” He writes that Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation.

www.vox.com...

It seems like Horowitz was a little soft to me.
Let's see what the FISA report says

originally posted by: Phage
.a reply to: burntheships

So he found political bias?

I don't know.
You said that he repeatedly said he found none. Can you provide an example? Shouldn't be hard if he said it repeatedly.

a reply to: fringeofthefringe

Another example of him saying he found no evidence that political bias affected the actions of those involved.

But not a statement that he found no political bias. Which is what I'm looking for.

Didn't we recently read somewhere the actual document explaining Strzok's disciplinary actions that were based on his affair and his blatant political motives against Trump?

a reply to: HalWesten

Did we?
Which document?
Who issued it?

Looked like it was suggested he saw some political bias but it did not rise to the level of impacting his(Strozks') investigation.
Sounds lame to me but that's what I got from it.
a reply to: Phage

Saw that too, not sure where.
I find it hard to conclude that Strozks' political bias was a non-factor.
a reply to: HalWesten