It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hill Testimony Validates Trump Election Tampering

page: 7
39
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   
theweek.com...


The Guardian has learned that the FBI applied for a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance (FISA) court over the summer in order to monitor four members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials. The FISA court turned down the application, asking FBI counter-intelligence investigators to narrow its focus. According to one report, the FBI was finally granted a warrant in October, but that has not been confirmed, and it is not clear whether any warrant led to a full investigation.

oh
and the dossier was used to obtain a warrant twice denied without it

like we would forget.....




posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

... And Manafort was guilty as I understand it.



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Your source does not prove your claim.



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: shooterbrody

Your source does not prove your claim.

mccabes testimony under oath does

nice try tho



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Nope.

Also I think you are getting warmer with the McCabe reference.



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: shooterbrody

Nope.

Also I think you are getting warmer with the McCabe reference.

oh so mccabe was lying under oath?
you will produce evidence of such a claim , No?

I will wait
no worries



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:47 PM
link   
Shall I quote r rosensteins account of what it takes to sign off on a fisa warrant also?



In order to get a FISA warrant, you need an affidavit signed by a career law enforcement officer who swears the information is true... And if it is wrong, that person is going to face consequences.
rr

every single signature swears it is true

hill shows they knew it was not prior to signing

all gained from that fisa is fruit of the poisonous tree
all the unmasking
all the 2 steps

all the dirt is going to be exposed

poo poo it if you like
no worries



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Uhhm. Are you saying you trust McCabe?

You do remember he was fired yes?



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: shooterbrody

Uhhm. Are you saying you trust McCabe?

You do remember he was fired yes?

waiting on you to retract or prove your claim..........

nice attempt to deflect tho......



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

What claim would you like proof of?

Your writing is spotty.



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
dance all you like
all hat
no cattle

run along now



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
dance all you like
all hat
no cattle

run along now



So you realized your mistake then?

Always glad to help.



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
You posted mccabe lied under oath
but you have no evidence of such
otherwise you would have produced such

so you are simply hot air

lol

you are dismissed



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
You posted mccabe lied under oath
but you have no evidence of such
otherwise you would have produced such

so you are simply hot air

lol

you are dismissed




Quote me bud.

Quote me saying McCabe lied under oath.



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: shooterbrody

Nope.

Also I think you are getting warmer with the McCabe reference.

oh so mccabe was lying under oath?
you will produce evidence of such a claim , No?

I will wait
no worries


Here's where you made your mistake ... May I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself?



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
lol



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

The Dossier wasn't complete until AFTER the election ... Doesn't that trouble your argument just a tad ... and by tad I mean completely.



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

The Dossier wasn't complete until AFTER the election ... Doesn't that trouble your argument just a tad ... and by tad I mean completely.


Not really, you act like it was inconsequential in the FISAs and investigation. How many times did the left and media use it as proof positive for three years, and your point about when it was completed is moot. You should be asking when was it used. Here is the time line...

Spring 2016 Beacon ends relationship with Fusion. DNC, Hillary campaign hires Fusion.
June 2016 Fusion GPS hires Christopher Steele.
June 20 Steele completes the first of seventeen sections of the dossier.[10]
July 14 Media accuses campaign of revising Ukraine plank in the Republican platform in the first major attack focusing on alleged Russian ties.
July 19 Second section of dossier completed.
Aug. 30 House Democratic leaders ask FBI to investigate Trump's Russia ties.[11]
July 26 to Sept. 14 Dossier sections 3 to 13 completed
Oct. 3 to Oct. 19 Sections 14 to 17 completed.
Oct. 11 A written account of Asst. Sec. of State Kathleen Kavalec's meeting with FBI informant Christopher Steele shows the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign-funded British intelligence operative admitted that his research was political and facing a November 8, 2016 Election Day deadline. The confession occurred 10 days before the FBI used the discredited Steele dossier to justify securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant on the 2016 Trump campaign. Steele's client, the Clinton campaign, “is keen to see this information come to light prior to November 8.”[12]
Oct. 21 FISA court grants FBI warrant to surveil Trump adviser Carter Page.
Nov. 8 Donald Trump wins U.S. presidential election.
Dec. 13 Steele compiles the final version of the dossier.
Jan. 10 Buzzfeed publishes dossier.[13]


edit on 22-11-2019 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

Nah, I'm not doing any of that . The Dossier was published in January 2017.

Nope. Also didn't say it was inconsequential to anything. I'm saying it wasn't complete at the time you're complaining about.

You don't know what parts were used for FISA warrants and you're whistling past the grave yard.

Might want to cite your bloated quote.



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 02:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

call them out quick, the facts will be here soon enough. Till then, bust them balloons.



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join