Nancy Pelosi Is Already Attacking the Legitimacy of the 2020 Election

a reply to: shooterbrody

Again your link is broken.


Biern Sanders, the victim in your fantasy, does not agree that he was victimized. Kind of like Volodymyr Zelensky, the victim of the DNC fantasy, does not agree with the DNC that he was victimized.

With out a victim; your allegations fall apart.

a reply to: DanDanDat
Sanders wasn't the only victim; his voters were.
And then the rest of us,as there was no actual as advertised competition.
Thanks tho!

a reply to: fringeofthefringe

Aunt Mable who sent $50 towards Bernie or Uncle Clyde who spends $150 every year to support his favorite candidate..etc... 
My point is people[not the DNC] are mostly under the impression that their $$ contributions and votes during/throughout the primary matter but in fact they don't. 

If Aunt Mable and Uncle Clyde are under a misconception that the DNC works differently then they imagine than they have only themselves to blame. Its not like the actions of the DNC aren't on full display to the world.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DanDanDat
Sanders wasn't the only victim; his voters were.
And then the rest of us,as there was no actual as advertised competition.
Thanks tho!

Sanders voters were not victims; they lost. Losing, even if you don't fully understand the rules, does not make you a victim.

The rest of us aren't entitled to a Democrat choice in the presidential competition. The presidential race is not a choice between Republicans and Democrats; neither is entitled to involvement, nor should we expect either for a fair presidential election.

Fair enough, buyer beware...or is it fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me?
Thanks for the civil back and forth.

originally posted by: DanDanDat

a reply to: fringeofthefringe

Aunt Mable who sent $50 towards Bernie or Uncle Clyde who spends $150 every year to support his favorite candidate..etc... 
My point is people[not the DNC] are mostly under the impression that their $$ contributions and votes during/throughout the primary matter but in fact they don't. 

If Aunt Mable and Uncle Clyde are under a misconception that the DNC works differently then they imagine than they have only themselves to blame. Its not like the actions of the DNC aren't on full display to the world.

a reply to: DanDanDat
What you are describing is fraud; imo the worst kind of fraud, voter fraud.
Defend it if you like , it is still unacceptable.
Had they followed the actual rules you may have a point; as you noted they DID NOT.
Nice try tho!

That's how I see it.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DanDanDat
What you are describing is fraud; imo the worst kind of fraud, voter fraud.
Defend it if you like , it is still unacceptable.
Had they followed the actual rules you may have a point; as you noted they DID NOT.
Nice try tho!

a reply to: shooterbrody

Voter fraud? What federal or state laws where broken in the choice of Clinton over Sanders? Again how the DNC, a private club, conducts their business is entirely up to them.

a reply to: DanDanDat
While the "link may be broken"
Counts for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and violations of a Washington, D.C. deceptive trade code are among the causes of action.

This is what the dnc was sued for.
Thanks tho!

Bam, that's a nice way to end the discussion.
Point set match

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DanDanDat
While the "link may be broken"
Counts for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and violations of a Washington, D.C. deceptive trade code are among the causes of action.

This is what the dnc was sued for.
Thanks tho!

It has never been more obvious than right now that the American people support Trump. They are rejecting this impeachment nonsense en masse with approval ratings and polls shooting up by 18-20% across the board.

People care about how America is doing as compared to how their family was doing in previous years and how it compares to other people in the same class in other countries. America is head and shoulders above the line in both margins and is putting up record numbers every day, that is what people care about.

A dog and pony yawn fest? If that is what Dems are counting on this next election....... Gonna be a very long 4.5 years for them.

How Unpopular is Donald Trump?


Do Americans Support Impeachment?

I’ve used Five Thirty Eight as a source because it aggregates multiple polls results.

The answer is, on both matters, still split. Imagine that.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right?

Yep.

Pelosi just nullfied Clinton winning the popular vote in 2016.

Cause it's 'dangerous to let voters decide'.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
How Unpopular is Donald Trump?


Do Americans Support Impeachment?

I’ve used Five Thirty Eight as a source because it aggregates multiple polls results.

The answer is, on both matters, still split. Imagine that.

Oh
So the schiff show hasnt convinced the public?
Wonder why?

Perhaps the would present some proof?
As opposed to sally told bill who said jim broke the law?

a reply to: shooterbrody

The Schiff and Pelosi show.

Straight out gestapo.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Have the impeachment hearings convinced you?

You're public.

Nope, according to Pelosi, the American public is too dumb to be trusted.

What is it you guys always say, she's accusing others of her own problems?

Yeah.

a reply to: Gryphon66

They have convinced me.

Team HATE Trump by any means necessary represent a clear and present danger to the Republic.

It's motivated me even more to show up at the polls next year.

a reply to: Gryphon66
Lol
Sorry for your continued string of very public losses.

Public ain't buying what schiff is selling.

Perhaps if they had proof?
You know, to kick a president out of office?

a reply to: neo96

I'm sure it's had the same effect on many.

I may even vote for the Republican nominee myself.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
Lol
Sorry for your continued string of very public losses.

Public ain't buying what schiff is selling.

Perhaps if they had proof?
You know, to kick a president out of office?

As usual, you're barking up the wrong tree.