Breaking Ukraine News: Head of Burisma Indicted

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Gryphon66

Can you point out where it says that Biden isn’t implicated?

I didn’t see that.

LOL ... nope.

Because Ryaboshapka didn’t say crap about that. The three MPs got this, leaked it, and pasted Biden’s name all over it.

a reply to: Deetermined

Just in case it gets 'lost' somewhere...

a reply to: Gryphon66

So it’s just your opinion, got it!

Here's an article dated April 2019 that takes us back to a meeting that took place in January 2016 between the Obama administration and Ukraine. Telizhenko worked at Kyiv’s embassy in Washington from December 2015 through June 2016, according to a copy of his C.V.

The other case raised at the January 2016 meeting, Telizhenko said, involved Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company under investigation in Ukraine for improper foreign transfers of money. At the time, Burisma allegedly was paying then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter as both a board member and a consultant. More than $3 million flowed from Ukraine to an American firm tied to Hunter Biden in 2014-15, bank records show.

According to Telizhenko, U.S. officials told the Ukrainians they would prefer that Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over. The Ukrainians did not agree. But then Joe Biden pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor in March 2016, as I previously reported. The Burisma case was transferred to NABU, then shut down.

The Ukrainian Embassy in Washington on Thursday confirmed the Obama administration requested the meetings in January 2016, but embassy representatives attended only some of the sessions.

How the Obama White House engaged Ukraine to give Russia collusion narrative an early boost

thehill.com...

Kulyk Is the prosecutor that’s been working with Guiliani to dig something up on the Bidens.

Maybe he did! I really do hope so. So many folks here being wrong so often gets boring.

Ryaboshapka who is now Prosecutor General by the way (Shokin’s old job) had to make an official statement because of the three MP’s.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Gryphon66

So it’s just your opinion, got it!

Indeed.

I do not have insider Ukrainian sources, I will admit.

a reply to: Deetermined

A John Solomon article, speaking of Opinion.

LOL.

a reply to: Gryphon66

It's not opinion when Solomon keeps video and audio recordings of his interviews, including one of the Ukraine prosecutor who says that Maria Yanovich gave him a list of people NOT to prosecute when he first came into office.

Over Target!

mobile.twitter.com...

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: Gryphon66

It's not opinion when Solomon keeps video and audio recordings of his interviews, including one of the Ukraine prosecutor who says that Maria Yanovich gave him a list of people NOT to prosecute when he first came into office.

Really? So all that has to happen for something to be factual news is that notes are kept?

Sure, okay.

a reply to: Gryphon66
So Reuters shows AN ONGOING INVESTIGATION?

Isnt that what trump inquired about?

Its ok
You can say it

Its over now

Look guys, I can’t watch you all do this to yourselves again honestly.

Note the differences between the news conference that Ryaboshapka held and the Interfax video that was posted.

a reply to: silo13

While we all know that Joe said these things, at least Solomon's article points out that the Obama admin tried to get the Ukraine to drop their investigation into Burisma during a White House meeting and the Ukraine first refused until Joe threatened them in March. We all know that when the Obama admin wants other countries to drop their investigations and turn them over to our FBI, that's code for, "we want to cover this up".

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: Gryphon66

It's not opinion when Solomon keeps video and audio recordings of his interviews, including one of the Ukraine prosecutor who says that Maria Yanovich gave him a list of people NOT to prosecute when he first came into office.

Really? So all that has to happen for something to be factual news is that notes are kept?

Sure, okay.

Well that is exactly what the entire impeachment sham is based on so.....

a reply to: Gryphon66

Really? So all that has to happen for something to be factual news is that notes are kept?

Sure, okay.

Do you even realize how dense you sound when you say this?! Solomon uses VIDEO and AUDIO of the people he interviews. How did you turn that into "notes"?! Give us a break!

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Look guys, I can’t watch you all do this to yourselves again honestly.

Note the differences between the news conference that Ryaboshapka held and the Interfax video that was posted.

It is an investigation into corruption in Ukraine?
Like potus asked about?

Almost as if he knew it was going on?

Nice of the house dems to HIGHLIGHT it in the most public of ways, wasn't it?

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: Gryphon66

It's not opinion when Solomon keeps video and audio recordings of his interviews, including one of the Ukraine prosecutor who says that Maria Yanovich gave him a list of people NOT to prosecute when he first came into office.

Really? So all that has to happen for something to be factual news is that notes are kept?

Sure, okay.

Quoted for absolute hilarity!

The entire impeachment hoax is based on just that!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

HONK HONK

a reply to: shooterbrody

It is an investigation into corruption in Ukraine?
Like potus asked about?

Almost as if he knew it was going on?

Nice of the house dems to HIGHLIGHT it in the most public of ways, wasn't it?

Investigating Ukraine became an international effort back in 2014 when the president during that time took corruption to new heights!

Yanukovich was not the first Ukrainian politician to engage in corruption, but he was certainly the best at it. In fact, the word corruption is a misleading one for Ukraine, since it implies a dishonest cancer afflicting an otherwise healthy organism, whereas in this case it was the other way round. Corruption was the system, and it metastasised into any parts of the state apparatus that remained healthy.

In the three years after Yanukovich took office in 2010, Ukraine slipped from an already disastrous 134th on Transparency International’s corruption perceptions index down to 144th – putting it level with countries such as the Central African Republic and Nigeria, which are synonymous with shadiness and mismanagement. But the financial damage that Yanukovich and his predecessors did to Ukraine is hard to measure in simple numbers. At the time of its independence in 1991, Ukraine’s economy was almost as large as Poland’s; now, it is a third of the size.

From April 2017...

The money machine: how a high-profile corruption investigation fell apart

www.theguardian.com...

Another source

Tass

a reply to: PurpleFox

Is that a clown car you’re in?

Do you have a point, or did you just want to chime in.

John Solomon is an Opinion journalist. He was moved to the Opinion section by the Editor at The Hill because his claims couldn’t be vetted.

Deet claimed that Solomon’s stuff is true because he “kept notes.”

You’re apparently trying to allude to the fact that several witnesses have stated that they keep notes.

Sondland, notably, doesn’t. You know Sondland, the guy that stated on the record today that Trump, Pence, Guiliani, Pompey etc. all knew that this Ukrainian thing was a quid pro quo?

Yeah.