It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

republicans got their ass handed to them

page: 10
43
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:21 PM
link   
Tucker makes some GREAT points.

www.youtube.com...




posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Other than Schiff, I think Swalwell looked the worst. His questions were corrected in the final session a couple times-- not a good look.

Also don't care about what Trump tweeted today. It has no bearing on these hearings. Emotional ploy to bring it up. I disagree with a lot of Trump tweets. But that has nothing to do with impeachment.

All of a sudden not being in on the phone call was a big deal for the Democrats to de-legitimize testimony at the end of the day. What was up with that?


For any Dolphins/Jets fans... Schiff's eyes totally remind me of Adam Gase... or is it just me?



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler




Vindman later admitted the word "demand" was never used in the transcript.

Neither was corruption, as the claim about "corruption."

Just because the word "demand" wasn't used doesn't negate that aid was conditioned on an investigation or a public statement thereof.



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: SuperStudChuck




Also don't care about what Trump tweeted today. It has no bearing on these hearings. Emotional ploy to bring it up


Especially after the last 3 years of Team Schiff saying mean things about Trump(intimidation).




posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:28 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6


Oh yeah, you were one of those "Asking a legal counsel if something would be illegal is equivalent to obstructing justice" honks in the waning days of the Russian Collusion investigation farce, weren't you? That explains a lot in the context of your arguments here. Save yourself a lot of typing time and just spam this from here on out:
IT'S ILLEGAL BECAUSE I WANT IT TO BE ILLEGAL AND THE NARRATIVE NEEDS IT TO BE ILLEGAL
and save us the read time along the way.


Oh, yeah, so you're one of those "it's not illegal because the bank robber failed to get away with the money" type of illogical wanks?

That explains a lot



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Grambler




Vindman later admitted the word "demand" was never used in the transcript.

Neither was corruption, as the claim about "corruption."

Just because the word "demand" wasn't used doesn't negate that aid was conditioned on an investigation or a public statement thereof.



And yet they didnt or havent as of yet that we know of carried out that investigation, and they have still received their aid.............

so..........



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: burdman30ott6


Oh yeah, you were one of those "Asking a legal counsel if something would be illegal is equivalent to obstructing justice" honks in the waning days of the Russian Collusion investigation farce, weren't you? That explains a lot in the context of your arguments here. Save yourself a lot of typing time and just spam this from here on out:
IT'S ILLEGAL BECAUSE I WANT IT TO BE ILLEGAL AND THE NARRATIVE NEEDS IT TO BE ILLEGAL
and save us the read time along the way.


Oh, yeah, so you're one of those "it's not illegal because the bank robber failed to get away with the money" type of illogical wanks?

That explains a lot


Your analogy would be appropriate, except that "the bank" says it wasn't robbed or attempted robbed.




posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Grambler




Vindman later admitted the word "demand" was never used in the transcript.

Neither was corruption, as the claim about "corruption."

Just because the word "demand" wasn't used doesn't negate that aid was conditioned on an investigation or a public statement thereof.



And yet they didnt or havent as of yet that we know of carried out that investigation, and they have still received their aid.............

so..........


As stated, irrelevant.

That's a tired argument, that "they received it so nothing was improper."

But nice narrative.



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:33 PM
link   
During the Russia 'investigation' didn't Schiff call Ukraine to get dirt on Trump ?



Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz has dug up a nearly two-year-old prank call in which House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff told two Russian radio hosts posing as a Ukranian politician that he would be willing to accept damaging anti-Trump information.



www.foxnews.com...
e dit on 19-11-2019 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:34 PM
link   
a reply to: TheGhoul

Or... it's exactly why Biden is running. So long as he's in the race, he's "immune" to facing allegations/charges. (Not necessarily legally immune-- just known that someone had his back.)

Zelinsky elected on April 21

Giuliani announces Ukraine investigation on April 23

Biden announced his candidacy on April 25

Timeline here: www.washingtonpost.com...
edit on 19-11-2019 by SuperStudChuck because: Clarifying



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence




As stated, irrelevant.


Yes were well aware that facts are irrelevant to the rabid left......

its much more relevant than the rest of your post by far.....to be fair






But nice narrative.



edit on 11/19/2019 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: burdman30ott6


Oh yeah, you were one of those "Asking a legal counsel if something would be illegal is equivalent to obstructing justice" honks in the waning days of the Russian Collusion investigation farce, weren't you? That explains a lot in the context of your arguments here. Save yourself a lot of typing time and just spam this from here on out:
IT'S ILLEGAL BECAUSE I WANT IT TO BE ILLEGAL AND THE NARRATIVE NEEDS IT TO BE ILLEGAL
and save us the read time along the way.


Oh, yeah, so you're one of those "it's not illegal because the bank robber failed to get away with the money" type of illogical wanks?

That explains a lot


Your analogy would be appropriate, except that "the bank" says it wasn't robbed or attempted robbed.



But they (Ukraine) expressed their concerns on several occasions, according to testimony.



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:36 PM
link   
Lol the only thing that stinks in this story is hunter Biden, and how he got a job from Ukraine, that paid him millions of dollars. Lol in the meantime democrats, are trying to throw bullcrap on the wall to see if it sticks. More so screaming at the top of their lungs thru the corrupt media “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.” Meh all in all democrats, can’t prove trump bribed, quid pro quo’d or whatever... One hell of a farce. It would be one thing if they had proof, they do not.



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: Liquesence




As stated, irrelevant.


Yes were well aware that facts are irrelevant to the rabid left......

its much more relevant than the rest of your post by far.....to be fair






But nice narrative.



One need not succeed at a crime for one to commit a crime.

But I'm sure you knew that, right?



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Grambler




Vindman later admitted the word "demand" was never used in the transcript.

Neither was corruption, as the claim about "corruption."

Just because the word "demand" wasn't used doesn't negate that aid was conditioned on an investigation or a public statement thereof.



And yet they didnt or havent as of yet that we know of carried out that investigation, and they have still received their aid.............

so..........


As stated, irrelevant.

That's a tired argument, that "they received it so nothing was improper."

But nice narrative.


So the actual fact that what Trump is being accused of didn't actually happen is irrelevant?

Just... wow.

So how is the weather in Narnia this time of year?




posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: Liquesence




As stated, irrelevant.


Yes were well aware that facts are irrelevant to the rabid left......

its much more relevant than the rest of your post by far.....to be fair






But nice narrative.



One need not succeed at a crime for one to commit a crime.

But I'm sure you knew that, right?


One would have at least have conspired to do the actual crime to commit one...

But I'm sure you knew that, right?

/facepalm

edit on 19-11-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:42 PM
link   
It is rather odd a low level army officer(LT. Colonel) to be offered a defense minister job out of the blue like that.

Not so odd for a CIA spook or FSB.



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Grambler




Vindman later admitted the word "demand" was never used in the transcript.

Neither was corruption, as the claim about "corruption."

Just because the word "demand" wasn't used doesn't negate that aid was conditioned on an investigation or a public statement thereof.



And yet they didnt or havent as of yet that we know of carried out that investigation, and they have still received their aid.............

so..........


As stated, irrelevant.

That's a tired argument, that "they received it so nothing was improper."

But nice narrative.


So the actual fact that what Trump is being accused of didn't actually happen is irrelevant?

Just... wow.

So how is the weather in Narnia this time of year?



Dont you DARE insult Narnia like that!



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: Liquesence




As stated, irrelevant.


Yes were well aware that facts are irrelevant to the rabid left......

its much more relevant than the rest of your post by far.....to be fair






But nice narrative.



One need not succeed at a crime for one to commit a crime.

But I'm sure you knew that, right?


One would have at least have conspired to do the actual crime to commit one...

But I'm sure you knew that, right?

/facepalm


And it would have to actually be a crime in the first place.......



posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Grambler




Vindman later admitted the word "demand" was never used in the transcript.

Neither was corruption, as the claim about "corruption."

Just because the word "demand" wasn't used doesn't negate that aid was conditioned on an investigation or a public statement thereof.



And yet they didnt or havent as of yet that we know of carried out that investigation, and they have still received their aid.............

so..........


As stated, irrelevant.

That's a tired argument, that "they received it so nothing was improper."

But nice narrative.


So the actual fact that what Trump is being accused of didn't actually happen is irrelevant?

Just... wow.

So how is the weather in Narnia this time of year?



It did happen. Whether he succeeded or not is what is irrelevant.

I know you're not that dense, so I'm sure you know that.



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join