It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
a reply to: TomLawless
originally posted by: tinner07
a reply to: TomLawless
what are your feelings on General Flynn?
I asked you first.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne
Vindman is supposed to be a man who fought on actual battlefields? Yet a few words, words that we've all seen, make him "unsettled"?
Something's not right here. I think the theory at www.abovetopsecret.com... may be the correct one.
a reply to: Grambler
So you admit you were factually wrong with your first question.
Now you move the goal post.
No, it is not evident that Trump made a demand, as even zelensky has admitted he didnt feel pressured, and when he agreed to investigate corruption into things mentioned on the call, he wasnt even aware that aid was being withheld.
Your prostitution metaphor is inaccurate.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne
Vindman is supposed to be a man who fought on actual battlefields? Yet a few words, words that we've all seen, make him "unsettled"?
Something's not right here. I think the theory at www.abovetopsecret.com... may be the correct one.
originally posted by: tinner07
a reply to: network dude
do you have proof his isn't?
that is a pretty strong retort... So I will go with... he did not call me.... so ball is now back in your court. You have evidence to prove he is a leaker?
You can admit that you are just a diehard trump supporter that will disparage a LT. Colonel or an ambassador to overlook your gods criminal activities.
a reply to: TomLawless
So you don't see the connection?
Are you just being obtuse?
Either way, I've apparently wasted ones and zeros.
originally posted by: Ahabstar
Is this confirmation that the Lt. Col. is the supposed second whistleblower then? It’s okay to out him (if so) but not the first whistleblower? Why is that?
you MUST follow the chain of command or there is a breakdown of rules, and bad things happen from there.
a reply to: Gryphon66
Being a whistleblower requires knowledge of a situation, not first hand knowledge.
The whistleblower’s complaint was validated by the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
originally posted by: matafuchs
Flynn was railroaded and they used his son as pressure. However, there is a reason he has not been sentenced and that usuall means that they are a witness in a pending case.
originally posted by: tinner07
a reply to: Grambler
So you admit you were factually wrong with your first question.
Now you move the goal post.
No, it is not evident that Trump made a demand, as even zelensky has admitted he didnt feel pressured, and when he agreed to investigate corruption into things mentioned on the call, he wasnt even aware that aid was being withheld.
Your prostitution metaphor is inaccurate.
I have been looking for that first question, I guess too you, that you mentioned. Maybe you could qoute it. I cant get past everybodys stupidity here... sorry.
do you agree the military aide was withheld by trump until an investigation into Biden was announced?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: network dude
And if a Marine is assigned to the National Security Council and told to report to the superiors in that area?
NO one has claimed that Trump has to prove that he is innocent. You guys apparently don’t understand the meaning of the word exculpatory.
That's exculpatory evidence: anything that clears someone or something of guilt or blame is exculpatory. Exculpatory comes from the Latin word exculpat, meaning "freed from blame." The verb exculpate means to free from guilt or blame.
REPRESENTATIVE NANCY PELOSI: That remains – the facts, if the President has information that demonstrates his innocence in all of this, which we haven’t seen. His transcript of a phone call is tucked away in a highly sensitive, compartmentalized intelligence server so we can’t see that. If he has information that is exculpatory, that means ex, taking away, culpa, blame, then we look forward to seeing it.
a reply to: projectvxn
Does anyone still want to get sour with me for calling this shill in uniform a seditious POS?