Whistleblower Indirectly Identified by Schiff and Vindman

BOOOM! Jordan says exactly what my post did, if vindman says he didnt talk to the whistle blower, and schiff doesnt know who the WB is, how is schiff telling Vindman not to answer who he talked to protecting the WB?

a reply to: Grambler

They fall into every trap, nearly every time.

It's amazing when you think about it. They always find the nastiest pile to step in.

Isn’t that called “lying under oath”?

Asking for a friend.

a reply to: Grambler

Thanks for that update!

Dem tries to ask witness williams if investigation into biden was in line with offical policy.

She says investigating corruption is in line with that, she cant decide if thats what trump was doing.

EXACTLY!!!!

So Vindman admits he change his job description from yesterday to today?

So a guy who cant even accurately tell us what his job is is supposedly and expert on Ukraine and star witness?

a reply to: Grambler

I wonder if he's one of those guys who "flexible" enough to be a contortionist?

Cheers

originally posted by: Grambler
So Vindman admits he change his job description from yesterday to today?

So a guy who cant even accurately tell us what his job is is supposedly and expert on Ukraine and star witness?

LOL!

Vindman was asked if anyone that makes policy decision on Ukraine reports to Vindman.

Now Schiff is defining what bribery is. Because Americans are too stupid to know what that means.

~Namaste

Schiff :Bribery involves conditioning aid for something of value"

Ok its been defined.

Biden conditioned aid for something of value.

By Schiffs own definition, this is bribery.

a reply to: Grambler

Here is what I don't understand...

Why do the Democrats and the media keep ignoring the fact that Biden was not a political rival at the time the discussions took place around the investigation of election fiddling in 2016 and Burisma extorting money from the US?

~Namaste

Again we have dems saying its unprecedented trump sought to investigate Biden.

Has Vindman ever heard of a VP conditioning aid to fire a prosecutor looking into his sons company?

Trumps unique request was the result of Bidens unprecedented extortion.

Vindman is a leaker,

a reply to: carewemust
you have proof of that?

a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne

"someone in the intelligence agency that was cleared" and was told by Schiff NOT to answer when Nunes asked who this was.

Did he not say "other people"?

originally posted by: tinner07

Vindman is a leaker,

a reply to: carewemust
you have proof of that?

do you have proof his isn't?

The title of this "show" should be, "How to step on your d*ck".

This is now a clown show full stop!

Dem questioning makes it clear the two witnesses herd the call.

Ok, they testified the transcript is accurate, and we can all read it.

Why is their opinion of the call relevant?

Here is what I don't understand...

Why do the Democrats and the media keep ignoring the fact that Biden was not a political rival at the time the discussions took place around the investigation of election fiddling in 2016 and Burisma extorting money from the US?

a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne

Fair question...

Another fair question, do you agree the military aide was withheld by trump until an investigation into Biden was announced?

Boom!

Chris stewart nails Vindman. He wont say bidens extortion was wrong!

This says all you need to know.

originally posted by: tinner07

Here is what I don't understand...

Why do the Democrats and the media keep ignoring the fact that Biden was not a political rival at the time the discussions took place around the investigation of election fiddling in 2016 and Burisma extorting money from the US?

a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne

Fair question...

Another fair question, do you agree the military aide was withheld by trump until an investigation into Biden was announced?

No that is clearly factually not true.

the aid was given, yet zelensky never did announce an investigation into biden.

Why is their opinion of the call relevant?

a reply to: Grambler

I could agree with that... except for the fact that they were there and privy too stuff....you know witness'

In your eyes, whose opinion matters? trumps? is that the only opinion that matters?


What is really irrelevant, is all these jack wagons on ATS saying nothing illegal happened...