It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whistleblower Indirectly Identified by Schiff and Vindman

page: 13
30
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 19 2019 @ 09:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Grambler

For the record, I think Mulvaney is right. Quid pro quo is foreign policy.

That’s assigned to the President in Article II.

So far, this has been a farce, albeit a Constitutional one.

I’ve decided that the Framers meant it to be this way. Allowing the People’s House to Impeach officers while making it virtually impossible to remove them unless there were real egregious issues involved. Intentionally or not, they were geniuses.


I concur and fully agree with you on this.




posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 05:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
I mentioned this before, but where in the process of reporting to your superiors and chain of command is spreading gossip to a whistleblower? I did a quick peak at the UCMJ and didn't see it there. I only served 6 years, so it's possible they never told me, or I just forgot. If spreading gossip that's classified is kosher, someone please let me know.


I would defer to the IDF on the Kosher question.
It's likely we'll get to hear more about LTC Vindman and the UCMJ after these proceedings are completed.

ganjoa
edit on 2019-11-20 by ganjoa because: new blutooth keyboard



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 06:53 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

That's Lt. Col. Turtle to you private.

when your whole defense is trying to smear the witness you are already on the losing side.

Hint... a defense includes things that prove innocence. He should be working on the "why he did this" because he sure isn't getting away with "he didnt do this".



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 06:55 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Who are lying?



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 06:56 AM
link   
a reply to: panoz77

Ummmm, that was you who said that.

LOL



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 07:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

"prove innocense"




posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 08:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: SonOfTheLawOfOne
This President does things differently. Nobody likes it. They just can't accept it and get over it. Just because he does things differently and takes a different approach to politics, the deeply entrenched Statesmen are afraid that their life's work is being undermined, instead of realizing that the People WANT it to be done differently than it has been. That would be supporting their country, not this display of a complete waste of our tax money.

The President was investigating corruption of the 2016 election, that just coincidentally, was involved with a soon-to-be (not at the time) political opponent and his son and colleagues of his. If his job is to ensure that our tax money is used as aid, and not funneled off into an oligarch's account, which has been proven to have happened with Burisma, he is doing his job by looking into where that money went, and by not wanting to give more money until it is understood and resolved.

And that can be viewed as a Quid Pro Quo? It doesn't get any clearer what the intention was.

Absurd.

~Namaste
I would say it’s more than that.... Soros is involved, ax it’s been posted elsewhere in one of these threads. I know I sound like a broken record about Soros, but what is he doing running the State Dept? Ive said before he runs the Democrat Party, but his puppet strings teach right into the State dept. I hope people will really consider the implication.
edit on 20-11-2019 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

That's Lt. Col. Turtle to you private.

when your whole defense is trying to smear the witness you are already on the losing side.

Hint... a defense includes things that prove innocence. He should be working on the "why he did this" because he sure isn't getting away with "he didnt do this".
Yah Im guessing you weren’t as respectful when people were saying “General Betrayus”. ??



posted on Nov, 20 2019 @ 10:11 PM
link   
a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne

Biden needs to be investigated because he's running for president.



posted on Nov, 21 2019 @ 01:20 AM
link   
a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne

Not only that, but this shows that despite their lies about not knowing the whistleblower, both Vindman and Schiff just admitted to knowing whom the whistleblower is as Schiff told Vindman not to tell whom his contact was because it is the whistleblower. Schiff and Vindman should be impeached. Vindman should be fired for lying and attempting to use lies together with the socialists/dems to depose the duly elected POTUS.

This charade has gone long enough. In today's political climate if you are a socialist/communist/democrat you can break the law and get away with it, meanwhile being a Republican/conservative is enough to not only accuse you of breaking the law, but it is enough to "impeach you."

BTW, the comments by Sondland today shifting the blame from POTUS trump, which is not to blame, to VP Pence is playing into the plan that democrats themselves admitted as wanting. Not that long ago socialists/democrats stated that they wanted to impeach Pence BEFORE impeaching POTUS Trump so that then the POTUS would be Pelosi.

To me it is ironic how this played out, but as the "inquiry" was ongoing it became clear that Sondland was simply assuming "everyone knew quid pro quo was occurring," which is BS since we found out yesterday that the Ukrainians did not know that the sale of the Javelins was being withheld until the end of August. Knowing this is prove that "there was no quid pro quo whatsoever."




edit on 21-11-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Nov, 21 2019 @ 01:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96


The guy reminds me of a turtle.


A turtle with a HUUUUUUGE ego. It is obvious Vindman thinks his own stance on policy on Ukraine is better, and more important than that of the POTUS, which is wrong. Vindman wasn't elected by the people.

Vindman also slipped, showing his HUUUUUUGE ego, by telling a representative whom is not in the military to address him as LT. Col. Vindman... That's what you tell to enlisted personnel, or lower military officers whom fail to address you appropiately... A civilian doesn't have to be compulsed to address you by your military rank.



edit on 21-11-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Nov, 21 2019 @ 02:42 AM
link   
FYI: With Public Support for Impeaching President Trump waning...

www.wpr.org...



The U.S. House leaves town for (another) 11 days of vacation..

www.rollcall.com...



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 11:10 AM
link   
"Eric Ciaramella"

I'm assuming his security clearance was revoked and he was put on the street minute-1.

Further, why aren't the soldiers who directly challenged their CINC stripped of rank and put up in a room at Hotel Leavenworth? Or GITMO with the other dangerous threats, I'm not picky. Do your damn jobs, which is to obey all orders from your chain of command period. NOT to question them, NOT to think about them and certainly NOT to offer your meaingless opinion on them. Do your job, or step down in disgrace.

Otherwise, this administration deserves what it gets from the insider threats. Time for the adults in the room to stop playing house with traitors (dems) and do a government-wide mass firing/arrest in all cases.

The coup doesn't end until its conspirators are thoroughly, publiclly and permanently made examples of.
edit on 11/22/2019 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2019 @ 11:17 AM
link   
Ah well, trust the plan trust the man.

I just know if this doesn't end with traitors swinging by their necks I will permanently lose all faith in this system, this government and our ability to pull this country off the brink with its intermittent trajectory toward a socialist, Citizen hating DUMP.
edit on 11/22/2019 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
30
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join