Impeachment Inquiry Depositions - Lots of Conflicts - Need to PROVE Who is Lying - Who is Truthful.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Auth3nt1k

What's wrong with asking Ukraine to investigate corruption and crimes committed by U.S. citizens in that country? Biden is just one of 3 entities that Ukraine said have questionable practices there.

That's why Ukraine has started an OFFICIAL investigation, picking up where the FIRED prosecutors/investigators left off, at President Trump's request.

Source: www.nbcnews.com...

It's too bad if Democrats don't like this. They should have more ethical leaders.

Ukraine is reopening a case against Zlochevskyi. We have had this case ongoing(with cooperation from GB). The article you linked literally says "There is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe or Hunter Biden." Did you read your own link?

I'm all for investigating Zlochevski. Infact one of the reasons the WORLD Democrats Republicans and all of Europe called for Shokin to be fired was because he WASN'T investigating Zlochevski.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

We'll see if Sondland corrects the testimony that he reversed due to recollections that had to be adjusted after Schiff called him.

That's why they did the questioning in secret. If you don't know whats already been testified you are more likely to be honest. It's why cops don't question suspects together.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

We'll see if Sondland corrects the testimony that he reversed due to recollections that had to be adjusted after Schiff called him.

If that call even happened (doubtful because The White House and The State Dept would have recordings), watch Trump release the transcript !! 🙂

How many transcripts has the president released again?

a reply to: Auth3nt1k

NBC is supposed to add "There is no indication of Joe or Hunter Biden did anything wrong" wording. All MSM outlets have to insert that wording until the evidence is revealed...which will occur at the right time. (A partial reveal/leak from Ukraine occurred last week.)

Soon, you'll be able see that the same wording was used, to describe every single person that the DOJ condemns or arrests.

originally posted by: Auth3nt1k

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

We'll see if Sondland corrects the testimony that he reversed due to recollections that had to be adjusted after Schiff called him.

That's why they did the questioning in secret. If you don't know whats already been testified you are more likely to be honest. It's why cops don't question suspects together.

And then you can change it the next day, after you read the newspaper, or receive a friendly call from someone?

a reply to: carewemust

The "Giuliani Papers" will prove everything out 😎

How long have you been saying this? I swear I've seen a post saying something similar everyday for years now.

Don't you ever feel betrayed? Lied to? Foolish for being strong along again?

What's the indictment count of trumps "best people" again?

If on December 12th there have been no charges brought will you finally give up on this or will it be....just a matter of time....there must be more evidence out there.....somewhere....

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: carewemust

The "Giuliani Papers" will prove everything out 😎

What's happened to America's mayor is just down right sad. Some how he has allowed himself to be brainwashed by the actual corruption in Ukraine he claims to be wanting to root out. It's truly sad. I hope he can avoid jail time because I do not think he will last long in there.

a reply to: Auth3nt1k

The "Giuliani Papers" will prove everything out 😎

Unconfirmed rumors that a fat man in a suit will be coming soon that has a list of the naughty and nice.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Auth3nt1k

The "Giuliani Papers" will prove everything out 😎

Are you talking about the 40 page document that Giuliani sent to the state department?

If so its funny the papers were filled with lies about ambassador Yovanovitch. She said it was all bs. Then not a single Republican would touch the information he provided with a 10 foot pole. Fox even went on and on about why arnt they using information Giuliani provided.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Auth3nt1k

The "Giuliani Papers" will prove everything out 😎

AND ANOTHER BOMBSHELL RELEASED TONIGHT.

From DAVID HALE, the #3 Guy at the U.S. State Department:

David Hale, the State Department’s No. 3 official, testified in a Nov. 6 closed-door deposition that no one in the Trump administration or any "government channel" ever mentioned former Vice President Joe Biden or his son Hunter as a reason for withholding aid from Ukraine, according to a transcript of his remarks released late Monday by House Democrats in their impeachment inquiry.

Democrats have argued that the White House improperly pressured Ukraine to look into the Bidens and Burisma Holdings, the natural gas company where Hunter Biden held a lucrative role despite limited expertise while his father oversaw Ukraine policy as vice president.

George Kent, a State Department official who has also testified in the impeachment investigation, said he flagged Hunter Biden's apparent conflict of interest to the Obama administration at the time.

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: carewemust

Yeah that's kinda the point of having the back channel. You want the people in the official channel denying it and you want your back channel people to make sure they(person/people you are trying to extort) know who's really in charge.

a reply to: carewemust

What happens if you lie to Congress

Democrats’ New Star Witness, David Holmes, Was Drinking Wine, Didn’t Take Notes 😃 😃 😃

David Holmes, the political officer at the U.S. embassy in Ukraine who has emerged as the Democrats’ new star witness in the “impeachment inquiry,” admitted he had been drinking wine at the time he claimed to overhear the president on the phone.

Holmes claimed to have overheard a conversation between U.S. Ambassador Gordon Sondland and President Donald Trump on a mobile phone on July 26, the day after Trump spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Holmes told the House Intelligence Committee in a closed-door hearing last Friday that Trump asked Sondland whether Zelensky would “do the investigation,” and Sondland said that Zelensky “loves your ass.”

a reply to: Auth3nt1k

Then on top of that 10 instances of obstruction that Mueller said he could indict the president on after he is removed.

I'm tired of that false statement. First, the Mueller report listed 10 "possible" or "potential" instances of obstruction of justice. Second, Mueller himself ended up debunking two of them under oath during his own testimony to Congress. That whole list is subject to debate, including Trump asking for Mueller to be fired for conflict of interest, in which we now know are many.

a reply to: Auth3nt1k

If so its funny the papers were filled with lies about ambassador Yovanovitch. She said it was all bs.

What did you expect her to say? In the meanwhile, John Solomon has a video taped interview of the prosecutor in Ukraine (Lenusko) stating that Yovanovitch absolutely gave him a list of people not to investigate or prosecute when he was brought on board.

well, so far this has been a snooze fest............

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: carewemust

What happens if you lie to Congress

That's true for Adam Schiff too, isn't it? He's been caught in several lies to Congress.

I'm in the car for many hours each day, and listen to liberal and conservative media.

MSNBC and CNN have had a steady parade of Congressmen proclaiming that the Open Session Impeachment witnesses have given "damning" testimonies against President Trump, and presenting evidence that is very "damning" to the President.

Yet they're increasingly frustrated that the American public are not reacting to this "damning" evidence.

Democrats in Congress and in the MSM are hinting that the American public is so stupid, we're unable to understand the gravity of President Trump's crimes, even when they were "effectively spelled out, in several very powerful testimonies".