It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Space Craft Nasa Photo ISS036-E-27207

page: 1
13
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 10:20 PM
link   
Heres what i believe to be multiple space craft look closely


Nasa Image ISS036-E-27207







What are these objects?




posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: VeilOfShadows

🍻 to your arrival. You’ve been a busy little bee. I’m lovin’ the inspiration. 🥂



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 10:30 PM
link   
a reply to: VeilOfShadows

Flying Fish!



posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 10:50 PM
link   







posted on Nov, 17 2019 @ 11:14 PM
link   
Lol, this is comedy. Why can’t we all just enjoy the nice colors?



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 05:34 AM
link   
I think this is a long exposure and they're stars. Turn the picture the other way up.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 06:49 AM
link   
Can only see blurs.
So my official analysis is: They are blurs.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 06:54 AM
link   
Looks like the Romulans and Klingons are up to no good again.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 07:44 AM
link   
The next image in the sequence



makes it even more obvious that it's stars. The ISS is positioned somewhere over central Asia north of the Himalayas. It is zooming on very closely on to clouds lit up by the sun, which is below the horizon west of the camera. There are several images in the sequence that make it clear that the photographer is zooming in very closely on to the atmosphere on the horizon.

What I can't get is a match on the various stars that are visible.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 07:49 AM
link   
a reply to: VeilOfShadows

Those are trails caused by prolonged exposure of the camera. It's usually the result of leaving the shutter speed very low (so to allow more light in) but moving the camera (either accidentally or voluntarily).



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 08:13 AM
link   
a reply to: VeilOfShadows

love the effort and enthusiasm but you can clearly see alot of motion blur in the photo so the zooms you captured will also be motion blurred esp. magnified


keep at it, i dont have the concentration to go and look at picture after picture in great detail.


its like the lotto, gotta play to win right? so keep lookin



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 08:55 AM
link   
They are obviously stars that are out of focus..



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 09:01 AM
link   
Got it


I uploaded a small section of the sharper image to Astrometry.net

nova.astrometry.net...

and from that was able to match the star trails in the OP image in Stellarium:




posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 10:48 AM
link   
Just an out of focus star right? lol nothing to see here move along



edit on 18-11-2019 by VeilOfShadows because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-11-2019 by VeilOfShadows because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

amazing, super cool that we can solve these things in less than a day. wish i could give you more than one star



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 12:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tortuga
Looks like the Romulans and Klingons are up to no good again.


Or Voyager off on one of those pesky time travel paradox things.



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: VeilOfShadows

If you aren't interested in the answer why ask the question?

The post above yours has absolute solid proof that what you are looking at are star strails caused by a combination of long exposure and motion blur.
edit on 18/11/2019 by OneBigMonkeyToo because: tyops



posted on Nov, 18 2019 @ 02:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: VeilOfShadows
Just an out of focus star right? lol nothing to see here move along




Yes. Got it in one.

Next?



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:24 AM
link   





posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 03:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: VeilOfShadows




Which part of 'motion blur' and 'long exposure' is difficult for you?

Why post the same heavily processed image three times without explaining what those images are and which photograph you have sourced them from, and what relation they bear to the one you posted originally?

Post the source and I'll tell you exactly which stars they are.




top topics



 
13
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join