Prince Andrew interview about epstein is a total farce

Regardless of whether we believe or don't believe his story, the truth is still being buried by the UK, in particular, Scotland Yard and mi6.
RPS are elite officers who protect every member of the Royals 24/7. Andrew couldn't fart in space without the smell getting back to London.

a reply to: oldcarpy

They are all psychopaths
An kates a witch, I see it in them

a reply to: ManyMasks

Glad to see you aren't at all judgmental!

Elite Rapist and Pedophile!

a reply to: texasyeti

You might say that.
I could not possibly comment!

😃

a reply to: texasyeti

Got to wonder if the Queen will attempt to distance herself from Andrew's horrendous antics, or the rest of the Royals for that matter?

Then again she's nigh on 94 years old, be lucky to ken what day of the week it is, nevermind that her son is a wrong'yin.

The Prince of beasts being 59 years old all the same, he has probably been at it for quite some time.

So that old chestnut called shock and surprise is probably right out the window to be honest.

a reply to: andy06shake

A senior Royal has confirmed the Queen is pissed off and Charles wants him stripped of his Royal title and sent into exile for the stupidity, ignorance and arrogance of appearing infront of the press in an unscreened interview.

They haven't mentioned or cited anything about how stupid, ignorant, naive or having any moral objection to his relationship with Epstein, inviting a convicted pedophile and child sex trafficker to his daughters 18th birthday (which was attended by young children of the Royals) or for being a repeat child rapist - they're cool with all that; it's the whole speaking to the press about it that's suddenly shown 'shocking lack of judgement and awareness making his position as an active Royal untenable'.

The only current defence he's receiving from the Palace is over claims by various former politicians and government ministers that Andrew used the phrase 'ni**er in the woodpile' to refer to Arabs when dining with the Saudi Royal Family and something along the lines of calling them 'A bunch of camel #ers' - but that has potential serious implications to the Royals and National Security as a whole: www.telegraph.co.uk...

The MET had dropped their investigation into Andrew, Scotland Yard somehow cleared him late August - but word is that the FBI and Scotland Yard are working together and there's mounting pressure on Scotland Yard to release details of their investigation and for the logs and records of Prince Andrew's security detail to be released to expose his pizza lie and other things.

Because it's become such a big international story, there's no PR agent to stonewall press enquiries or destroy evidence, it's a rare occasion where the press will have unlimited resources to keep this story running and authorities/home secretary under heavy scrutiny. There's decades of rumour, conjecture and photographs/film of him meeting and greeting young women who may be overage but personally I'd be asking them why they aren't in school but nothing that'd passs the criteria for proof/publication editors, lawyers and newspaper managers require to avoid libel.

So far it's not looking good for him. The Torygraph usually defend the royals and allow MI5/MI6 to write for them, it's the closest to State controlled media the UK has and provides the best guide to deduce what tactics MI5/MI6 are using to manipulate public perception.

Instead of defending him they're one of they're hanging him out to dry and were the first to announce he was acting 'rogue' and didn't inform the Queen until after the interview took place, broke every rule the Palace/Firm have and they're distancing themselves from him with former Palace staff and Prince Andrew's former head of security going on the record saying he has to have full public police investigation and appear in court. They're not asking for or hiding behind source anonymity when actively approaching the press and making such massive claims which means from experience they know they won't face retribution or character assassination from the Palace or MI5/MI6.

With the election coming up - both Labour and Tory MPs, former aides, former members of government are actively approaching the press and spilling any dirt and providing a treasure trove of sleaze and scandals about him. Again they're happy to put their name to their claims instead of asking for anonymity and will be fully aware of the powers, potential and practical methods intel and the palace would usually be using.

It's a dramatic change - usually it's impossible to find someone willing to make a comment even off the record. Instead they're queuing up outside radio, tv, newspapers. Providing scandals that'd been covered up for decades and have no fear of putting their face and name to the claims.

Personally I think he's been stripped of any Palace or Intel protection, it's become an open secret in press and political circles and open season has been declared on him.

If he'd followed intel, pr, legal or palace advice he would have just asked for a super-injunction covering his links with Epstein making it illegal for the press to write or report about any of this and had complete immunity from public scrutiny.

a reply to: bastion

The only reason The Royal Family are angry with Andrew is because he stooped so low as to be seen to be needing to use MSM to defend and justify himself; they believe they are above such things, beyond reproach and unanswerable to our Law.


Great post.

a reply to: Freeborn

that is mental , he deserves to be locked up and his titles removed and all his money given to charity for abused children

, if they dont make an example of him to quell public mood
then britain is going to get a bit more rowdy

originally posted by: bastion

A senior Royal has confirmed the Queen is pissed off and Charles wants him stripped of his Royal title and sent into exile for the stupidity, ignorance and arrogance of appearing infront of the press in an unscreened interview.

Now that's what I call hypocrisy

From an adulterer, who made his own cringe worthy TV interview with

Jonathon Dimbleby, and crude phone messages to his mistress that were

intercepted by the media.

a reply to: eletheia

Im not defending adultery or prince charles but the two are very far from each other hahaha

adultery is one thing , child abuse is another , at least the adult charles committed adultery with done so with their own consent !

he is still a hypocrite of course hahah

arent they all

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: eletheia

Im not defending adultery or prince charles but the two are very far from each other hahaha
adultery is one thing , child abuse is another , at least the adult charles committed adultery with done so with their own consent !
he is still a hypocrite of course hahah
arent they all

Indeed I am not comparing .......just saying *people in glass houses shouldn't

throw stones*.....

originally posted by: 2Faced
As frustratingly sad as it sounds, you’re probably right.
a reply to: zatara

As said somewhere in a thread before... Andrew must be aware that there is most likely a blackmail recording in possesion of the FBI with him playing the lead with a child. How can he sit there in that chair and lie in the face not only of the victims but also to the FBI and all US and UK judges. Only if he is sure having got away with the crime he has the balls to give this interview.

In front of the screens it was awfully silent these last few months, but behind them not so....until this stupid interview. I think the inteligence agencies of both nations and their governments tried to find a way to get andrew off the hook. An agreement much have been reached ..but with a steep pricetag I am afraid. The UK-government owes the US a considerate I-OWE-U.

The above is all speculation and theory...of course.

a reply to: bastion

So they are spilling the beans on the man for there own political gain or kudos?

Never seen that one coming.

Personally i hope he sees a police cell and courtroom prosecution for his antics but im not getting my hopes up.

a reply to: andy06shake

Cant stand Andrew but re prison - for what crime, exactly?

a reply to: oldcarpy

Sex with underage girls springs to mind.

That's statutory rape in the U.S in most states if memory serves.

a reply to: eletheia

well it doesnt really matter, since even if they break the window , we will be paying for it hhahahahaha

a reply to: oldcarpy

Surely he should be investigated because he was involved with a criminal as his friend
so surely he must have known what was going on , or at least something

he needs to be questioned in court though

because he is implicit in these crimes if he had knowledge of events
and hasnt come forward to rat on his pal

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: oldcarpy

Sex with underage girls springs to mind.

That's statutory rape in the U.S in most states if memory serves.

The girl referred to in the interview was 17 and it was in the UK not the USA?

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: oldcarpy

Surely he should be investigated because he was involved with a criminal as his friend
so surely he must have known what was going on , or at least something

he needs to be questioned in court though

because he is implicit in these crimes if he had knowledge of events
and hasnt come forward to rat on his pal

Do you mean "complicit"?

I dont see any actual criminal offence you see. Being a complete bell end and having friends who are convicted criminals are not actual crimes.