It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: lostgirl
originally posted by: Trillium
originally posted by: onehuman
Well according to this graph nobody unplug anything
/
Good thing you posted that image (probably should save it somewhere) - I just went to onehuman's link, and those top two graphs are different now!!
In fact all the graphs have changed to show a 'gap' during that time period, making it 'look as if' phoenix358's suggestion that the gap on the original graph posted by onehuman was just a glitch or even a joke - that maybe "someone had disconnected the [input] leads"...
Seems very suspicious of...something...?
Two members of the public have died after an attack on London Bridge in which police also shot dead a man.
The Met Police has declared the attack a terrorist incident.
The suspect, who died at the scene, was believed to have been wearing a hoax explosive device, police said.
Videos on social media appear to show a group of passers-by holding down a man on the bridge. A firearms officer arrives, seems to indicate to the group to get clear, and fires a shot.
In the early hours of the morning on November 22, 2019, four G4S trucks raced from a secret facility northwest of London carrying a special cargo. They were accompanied by a police escort, with a helicopter flying overhead. Lights flashed as they drove to a London airport, where 20 heavy, wooden boxes were carefully loaded and tied down in a Boeing 737 freighter plane.
“It was the eighth time we had made the trip, in the middle of the night,” Paul Holt, General Manager of G4Si in Europe (North and South), Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States, said. “It was all very secretive, and extremely important it was done well.” The boxes were full of gold bars, bound for Poland.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
There have been way too many citizen as well as professional investigators and researchers doing some heavy lifting to buy into this baloney.
Sometimes I think the fear of causing a shock wave throughout the American populace is what keeps these government officials who are charged with making Big Reports go soft on charging people involved too harshly.
It is always something like protocol failures or mishandling government documents or inappropriate this-or-that. And, then comes the usual gloss--over: "But, we found no political bias or criminal intent".
Bullspit! That crapola is not going to fly this time.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
There have been way too many citizen as well as professional investigators and researchers doing some heavy lifting to buy into this baloney.
Sometimes I think the fear of causing a shock wave throughout the American populace is what keeps these government officials who are charged with making Big Reports go soft on charging people involved too harshly.
It is always something like protocol failures or mishandling government documents or inappropriate this-or-that. And, then comes the usual gloss--over: "But, we found no political bias or criminal intent".
Bullspit! That crapola is not going to fly this time.
This ^^^
The research in this thread alone indicates something well beyond just stupid doing stupid in so many areas. That's open source.
Though in not-fairness each system is so compartmentalized by design that DOJ could be right in finding no "wrong doing" on an issue within in their own carefully crafted rules which can make premeditated murder okay per Human Resources Stipulation.
C_A would be a case in point, killing a foreign leader is immoral but C_A TOS say it is a-okay because they wrote the TOS make sure it was okay.
I imagine the FBI is exonerated for "spying" because orders came from Brennan who has no such limitations, but if he's cornered he says " zerObama made me do it..." which, since he's the Executive means States Secrets, which means, the report must remove all indications zerObama was involved, so...
This ^^^ is why Q.
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
If Durham/Barr come up empty then I’ll declare SpyGate a hoax just like Russia Collusion and Ukraine Impeachment.
Until then, IG stuff is just minor league stuff.