House Intel Committee Hearing Nov 15 2019 ---- Marie Yovanovitch

a reply to: DBCowboy

Orange Man (made her) Sad?

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: DBCowboy

Orange Man (made her) Sad?

Nope. Orange Man tamped with a Federal Witness in blatant public view.

It’s time to stop the apologetics for the man.

a reply to: Ahabstar

Orange Man Bad,
Made Girl Sad,
Schiff was Glad,
For Impeachment Fad.



(I'll see myself out)

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: DBCowboy

Orange Man (made her) Sad?

Nope. Orange Man tamped with a Federal Witness in blatant public view.

It’s time to stop the apologetics for the man.

you are serious, aren't you. A tweet during the impeachment hearing, of the guy being impeached, showing displeasure, is witness tampering? I thought this was just the public portion of all this, they already got her testimony from the secret room. Again, this is what desperation looks like.

a reply to: Gryphon66

That’s a different thread, but everyone pretty much laughed at that spin. Best to let it go and work a different angle...maybe how Republicans tried to disrespect Schiff’s authority? Just throwing out there. No one has really played with that one yet.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: DBCowboy

Orange Man (made her) Sad?

Nope. Orange Man tamped with a Federal Witness in blatant public view.

It’s time to stop the apologetics for the man.

She didn't even know about the tweet until Schiff pointed it out to her.

So how is it witness tampering when;

1. This is just an inquiry.
2. The "witness" doesn't even know she's being spoken about until Schiff points it out?

So Schiff actually tampered with the "witness".

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: DBCowboy

Orange Man (made her) Sad?

Nope. Orange Man tamped with a Federal Witness in blatant public view.

It’s time to stop the apologetics for the man.

She didn't even know about the tweet until Schiff pointed it out to her.

So how is it witness tampering when;

1. This is just an inquiry.
2. The "witness" doesn't even know she's being spoken about until Schiff points it out?

So Schiff actually tampered with the "witness".

This is EXACTLY why Schiff was right about holding secret hearings in hermetically-sealed rooms in the basement.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I have to ask, since she was fired before the "phone call" about bribery and extortion, why was she even there?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT

I have to ask, since she was fired before the "phone call" about bribery and extortion, why was she even there?

She cried in secret testimony and Schiff thought that might make this whole thing more interesting.
IOW: The Bad Orange Man made Nice Lady sad.

a reply to: IAMTAT

To shield them from himself? And no cross exam? And so people couldn’t hear that all this glorious testimony is from people that have never actually spoke with the President at any point in time?

Yeah I would hide that sort of stuff too.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I have Cavuto on in the back office and someone he interviewed said something interesting.

He said that the previous administration didn't supply arms to Ukraine.

But Trump does and he gets impeached.

Is Trump being impeached BECAUSE he sold arms to Ukraine?

a reply to: DBCowboy

Obama gave Ukraine MREs and aspirin to fight Russia...and Trump sends Ukraine missiles to fight Russia.
...but Trump colluded with Russia.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT

I have to ask, since she was fired before the "phone call" about bribery and extortion, why was she even there?

No one that has testified had any reason to be there. Those first two clowns never spoke to Trump in their life. I doubt she has either. None of them have relevant, first hand information, the all just got their panties in a bunch because they were being cut out of the loop. Every one of them admitted Trump allowed "lethal aid", which they were all in favor of, where Obama did not.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT

I have Cavuto on in the back office and someone he interviewed said something interesting.

He said that the previous administration didn't supply arms to Ukraine.

But Trump does and he gets impeached.

Is Trump being impeached BECAUSE he sold arms to Ukraine?

Trump's getting impeached because, number one, he had the audacity to circumvent the deep state, do nothing beurocrocy, to get **** done in an efficient manner, and number two, because they know they will lose the election.

They are desperately grasping at straws, as they have been doing for three years now.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT

I have Cavuto on in the back office and someone he interviewed said something interesting.

He said that the previous administration didn't supply arms to Ukraine.

But Trump does and he gets impeached.

Is Trump being impeached BECAUSE he sold arms to Ukraine?

Yes, that is about the size of it.

Trump's foreign policy is not the deep states foreign policy - so he has to go. That really does seem to be what all the testimony so far seems to point at.

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT

I have Cavuto on in the back office and someone he interviewed said something interesting.

He said that the previous administration didn't supply arms to Ukraine.

But Trump does and he gets impeached.

Is Trump being impeached BECAUSE he sold arms to Ukraine?

Yes, that is about the size of it.

Trump's foreign policy is not the deep states foreign policy - so he has to go. That really does seem to be what all the testimony so far seems to point at.

From what I can see, they don't even really disagree with the actual policy.

They just don't like that he bypassed them, and handled it his own way.

In any case, POTUS is in charge of forming foreign policy. That FACT is not in dispute. It is not the purview of ambASSadors.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: DBCowboy

Orange Man (made her) Sad?

Nope. Orange Man tamped with a Federal Witness in blatant public view.

It’s time to stop the apologetics for the man.

Again....stop with the crap BS. He didnt do anything to her in public view.

The ONLY reason anyone in that hearing knew there was a tweet was because Adam Schiff said so.

Do you want your elected reps checking their social media during what they call "serious" impeachment hearings?

Schiff is a joke.

Trump won't be impeached and all anyone will hear for the next 5 years is screaming and whining.

You can claim Libertarian all you want, but you obviously have no critical thinking involved in your knee jerk reactions.

Oh...and also....this isn't a court.

a reply to: Arnie123

yeah kind of odd argument for silly to make hasn't roger stone worked for over 40 years in politics? i mean by sillys logic wouldnt that mean roger stone is above reproach?

best moment

youtu.be...

What is shifty really afraid of ?
toresays.com...