It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Intel Committee Hearing Nov 15 2019 ---- Marie Yovanovitch

page: 6
22
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:14 PM
link   
There is no β€˜right’ to get an explanation for your exit, miss ambasador. It would be great for your β€˜closure’. Maybe you would not be so butthurt now. Really sad after so many years, but thats the risk of your job. Get over it!




posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Alright I am out.
You guys are lying and making stuff up because you're angry.

I get it.


Well unless you can list all Marie's accomplishments that were successful πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ πŸ˜ƒ



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:21 PM
link   
The impeachment circus is already helping President Trump's approval rating increase. Up four points just this week.

mobile.twitter.com...



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:23 PM
link   
Schiff just negatively referenced "conditions" to foreign aid but forgot to say the Bill that gave aid to Ukraine did have some conditional language πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒ

Schiff just screwed up the adjournment !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒ

Final Score:

Republicans 49
Democrats 9



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

She could fool people for thirty three years?


There are so many problems with your assumption
that any person is guaranteed a government job
for any number of years, let alone 33 years.

Not the least of which is that just like any
other President, Trump has the right to
appoint whom he wishes.

Elections have consequences and your candidate lost.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:30 PM
link   
Schiff in a press conference now trying to control today's damage and failure
πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒ



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: JesperA

Next week when the witnesses being called all had first hand knowledge that statement above is going to come to the end of its sell by date.
Just saying.


Yeah sure they will.

That's why they are scheduled for next week. Schiff wanted to start out the impeachment inquiry and make it clear it was a joke by calling hear se witnesses first.

You seem to literally have no ability to think logically whatsoever.
edit on 15-11-2019 by proximo because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123

Primarily it means that for thirty three years she kept the job. She was kept from one president to another since Ronald Reagan, so no one had any problem with her performance and even now no reason was given for her being called back from that position, she was even told she had done nothing wrong.
Its setting up the history of her employ. It goes to credibility and reputation.

what has she lied about do you think?


I have to assume you watched this. When she was asked about her new position, did you pay any attention to that? She is now a teacher, of 1 class. 14 students. And she gets paid the same she did. I'd love to be "fired" this way. Your virtue signalling is cute but pointless.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:34 PM
link   
My conclusions for today:
The ambassador is digruntled about losing β€˜her’ job. How does anyone DARE to fire her??
Dems are not assuming innocence, but are assuming guilt

A waste of time and US taxpayer money.
edit on 15-11-2019 by Goedhardt because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Now she admits she couldn't bring herself to praise Trump πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒ



Yeah, but she's not a never Trumper - not at all. I mean the only thing she is testifying too is he fired her for no cause, but she's not biased - she promises.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Will he get writing credits for Stephen Colbert tonight?



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:36 PM
link   
So over 3 hours of testimony and I am left believing, based on the testimony of Marie Yovanovitch, that she does not approve of the President's approach to the Ukraine and yet she kept stoping her self short of calling his actions illegal. She does not approve of the way she was removed from her post, but aknowlages that there is nothing illegal about her removal. That she does not approve of the way Rudy Giuliani was used as an end run around of her department, but that past administrations and campaigns have done the same. That she was briefed about the conflict of interest thar existed between VP Biden, his son and the Ukrainian government, but that she didn't feel it was that big of an issue to concern her self with. And that because she personally didn't feel it was a big consern it makes no sense to her, other than corruption, that the current president would disagree.

I actually feel bad for this woman. I think she honestly believes in the saying she keeps bringing up that when it comes to diplomacy that "that US politics stops at the water's edge". I think she is like that frog that was boiled alive by raising the temperature slowly. The Democrats dealt her a raw deal. At the start she was brought in to do her duty in recounting her knowledge, any good patriot would do the same when asked. However she did not expect to become the star witness for the Democrats. She didn't expect to sit for hours of public testimony.

Her facial expressions and body language shows she is uncomfortable with the way Congress is forcing her to go past the waters edge.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:36 PM
link   
Double post
edit on 15-11-2019 by DanDanDat because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Goedhardt

but she wasn't fired. She was removed from her post, and was able to chose her next one. She teaches at Georgetown now. 1 class. 14 students. 1 class. And she gets the same paycheck. LOL, 1 frigging class. And she is tearing up. Bwahahahahahaahhaahhaa



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:38 PM
link   
Someone forgot to ask Yovanovitch about her
ahem "non standard" communication channels
with Hillary Clinton.

You know, that unauthorized unsecured private email
server which ended up causing the deaths of many
at Benghazi.

This woman is a bad actor too.
Good grief!



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:41 PM
link   
So a US ambassador to Ukraine got fired after the President of both countries agreed she needed to be replaced...and THIS is supposed to be 'Must See' TV for every major network for the entire day?

The Dems really do have NOTHING.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:46 PM
link   
Elise Stefanic is hot.....


That is all......



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So a US ambassador to Ukraine got fired after the President of both countries agreed she needed to be replaced...and THIS is supposed to be 'Must See' TV for every major network for the entire day?

The Dems really do have NOTHING.


That's not really accurate.

They have a lot of opinions, feels, and anger.

If you mean actionable facts, then yes, they have less than nothing.
edit on 11152019 by Mach2 because: Sp



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:53 PM
link   
So Ambassadors are appointed by the President with the vast majority being partisan hacks and their reward is an Ambassadorship. This is why Obama fired all of Bush's appointees and so did Trump with his 80 or so Obama's all gone by his inaugural day.

This is what Presidents do and Yovanovitch was a carryover with rather deep ties to Obama and Hillary. If one connected the dots with the whole Russian collusion event one could easily see why Trump had no faith in her. The part I find funny with the hearing is the liberals keep suggesting that removal of an Ambassador for pure political reasons is some how wrong and something only Trump has done when we know EVERY President has done the same thing.

What is up with this constant selective remembering on part of the left... It never ends.



posted on Nov, 15 2019 @ 02:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So a US ambassador to Ukraine got fired after the President of both countries agreed she needed to be replaced...and THIS is supposed to be 'Must See' TV for every major network for the entire day?

The Dems really do have NOTHING.


But she was sad.

So impeach because; Sad.




top topics



 
22
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join