House Intel Committee Hearing Nov 15 2019 ---- Marie Yovanovitch

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: JesperA

Next week when the witnesses being called all had first hand knowledge that statement above is going to come to the end of its sell by date.
Just saying.

And if it doesn't, are you willing to bet your ATS account on it? Are you confident enough to leave and never come back if Trump doesn't get impeached?

Lets not go down that road. I like comedy, and this one source is precious for that aspect. Please don't take that away from me.

a reply to: Goedhardt

Most real Americans, anyway.

Now she admits she couldn't bring herself to praise Trump 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃

Schiff always putting words in their mouths 😃😃😃😃😃

a reply to: xuenchen

To quote a famous poster:

BWAHAHAHHHAAAHAHHAA!

I have a new HERO: Miss Stefanik!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: JesperA

Next week when the witnesses being called all had first hand knowledge that statement above is going to come to the end of its sell by date.
Just saying.

OMG, you have been saying that about every dem dead end investigation, for 3 years now.

Has it ever occured to you that you may be backing fraudulent causes?

I mean, at some point, you have to stop betting on a lame horse.

Congresswoman Stefanik just outlined a couple dozen recent Schiff lies 😃😃😃😃😃
😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃

Schiff was gulping and gasping 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃

Swalwell just entered articles into the record that have "sources" 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃

Swalwell with scripted questions again. So obvious 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃

Glorious!

It's crazy, how these commies in the house care so much about Yovanovich losing her job, but couldn't have cared less about ambassador Ted Stevens losing his LIFE in Benghazi.

Infuriating.

Now Marie just had to admit she did nothing about the extreme partisanship displayed by Democrats when she took her Ambassadorship. 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

Is it me, or is this 5 minute break taking a bit longer than 5 minutes?

a reply to: Arnie123

Primarily it means that for thirty three years she kept the job. She was kept from one president to another since Ronald Reagan, so no one had any problem with her performance and even now no reason was given for her being called back from that position, she was even told she had done nothing wrong.
Its setting up the history of her employ. It goes to credibility and reputation.

what has she lied about do you think?

a reply to: Arnie123

Don't be ridiculous. Do you think everyone is stupid?
She could fool people for thirty three years?

a reply to: TomLawless

Hard to muster passion for an illegal arms dealer. Especially when you might get found out if people kept digging around.

a reply to: xuenchen

Alright I am out.
You guys are lying and making stuff up because you're angry.

I get it.

a reply to: Sillyolme

DMV and Post Office has workers that have been there 30+ years. Doesn’t make them spectacular in their job though.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Alright I am out.
You guys are lying and making stuff up because you're angry.

I get it.

“Lying and making stuff up because you’re angry”

Literally 100% of your posting history.