It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen
Pelosi may have evidence clearing Trump of any wrong doing, but what she did by saying that was she doesn’t have any evidence and wants to know what evidence Trump has to clear himself.
Hmm ... so going with the common courtroom analogy, when the judge tells the defense they can make their case, he’s really admitting that the prosecution doesn’t have one?
That doesn’t seem right, does it?
Any good prosecutor will have already looked for evidence or anything that would clear the person on trial.
That's just common sense.
What Pelosi is doing is goading Trump to release evidence SHE may not already have.
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
Nancy believes you have to pass bills to know what’s in them so it’s no surprise she believes guilty until proven innocent
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
But Nancy said in plain English that Trump needs to show some evidence of innocence.
Why are YOU hacking-up the facts ? 😃 😃 😃 😃 😃 😃 😃 😃
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
But Nancy said in plain English that Trump needs to show some evidence of innocence.
Why are YOU hacking-up the facts ? 😃 😃 😃 😃 😃 😃 😃 😃
And doesn't someone charged with anything...have to provide the defense(his or hers)...by providing an alibi that can be proven?
And a drug neighborhood needs confidential informants...and the accused would never even know whom they were.
And we don't even have all the facts...but, we'll see soon, huh?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
She did not say that.
She said if he has exculpatory evidence he should present it.
Rolls eyes.
Right now, we're observing am investigation/hearings. Trump has not been accused of anything.
This infuriates me how they can get away with this BS. It's the biggest farce I've seen yet!
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Sookiechacha
So you believe the burden is on the accused to prove innocence?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Right now, we're observing am investigation/hearings. Trump has not been accused of anything.
"shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial"
If and when...(not really if), the House Judicial Committee reviews the evidence from the investigation, they will craft "Articles of Impeachment". These articles will be sent to the Senate, where the public trial will be held.
Then the president's legal team can present a vigorous defense, confront witnesses, etc. with the "impartial" Senate jury and Chief Justice judge.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Sookiechacha
So you believe the burden is on the accused to prove innocence?