It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lagomorphe
My claim: The Trump-Zelensky transcript has been in public view for weeks.
My evidence: The White House released the transcript on September 24, 2019. Source
No links to obvious proof?
This is ATS...
Deny ignorance
LOL. Right back at you.
I made a claim, and I established why I made the claim, and there’s zero way that anyone can deny my claim.
Period.
You made a conjecture , based on anothers conjecture.
Hardly fact.
Speculation.
Denying ignorance.
Why ?
Some , although denied and refuted , just keep on like the Energizer Bunny , never knowing when to stop.
Go read what I said and get back to me.
PS What I said was, we all know what was on the phonecall. To continually claim that a witness cannot testify because they weren’t ON THE CALL is dumb, in my opinion.
I’m beginning to think you guys know that and don’t care.
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I see this clip is going to be repeatedly spammed.
Here’s the most obvious counter to this nonsense.
The Trump-Zelensky call’s transcript has been out in the public for weeks.
We all know what the call said.
Several of these witnesses listened to the call DIRECTLY (VIndman, etc.)
Kent and the other Trump officials were aware of the efforts headed up by Mayor Rudy for months to get an investigation of the Bidens going. There’s really not any questions here ... Mick Mulvaney stated that quid pro quos are common.
/shrug
You say obvious.
Show us this obvious proof or is this JUST YOUR POINT OF VIEW?
Thank you.
Lags
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: CynConcepts
... but it was fine to use Congressional hearings repeatedly as well as the FBI to investigate Clinton in 2015-16?
How do you figure? I mean if it is wrong now it was wrong then.. Right?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
That's all you got?
And every one a solid employee with a record of exemplary behavior.
Oh my too bad huh
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
That's all you got?
And every one a solid employee with a record of exemplary behavior.
Oh my too bad huh
originally posted by: The GUT
Mockingbird Media needs something, anything, preferably Orange Man Bad innuendo to talk about when the IG report hits.
I watched pretty much every minute of the, ahem, inquiry and this aspect of the coup is even more poorly constructed than I would've thought.
Deep state puppets who believe their "policy" overrides the President's authority.
The clownish gang-that-couldn't-shoot straight has missed the King again.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
They all know that Trump wanted the Ukrainians to investigate Biden. We all know the same thing.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lagomorphe
My claim: The Trump-Zelensky transcript has been in public view for weeks.
My evidence: The White House released the transcript on September 24, 2019. Source
No links to obvious proof?
This is ATS...
Deny ignorance
LOL. Right back at you.
I made a claim, and I established why I made the claim, and there’s zero way that anyone can deny my claim.
Period.
You made a conjecture , based on anothers conjecture.
Hardly fact.
Speculation.
Denying ignorance.
Why ?
Some , although denied and refuted , just keep on like the Energizer Bunny , never knowing when to stop.
Go read what I said and get back to me.
PS What I said was, we all know what was on the phonecall. To continually claim that a witness cannot testify because they weren’t ON THE CALL is dumb, in my opinion.
First , read my post with comprehension.
Apparently you did not...