It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I see this clip is going to be repeatedly spammed.
Here’s the most obvious counter to this nonsense.
The Trump-Zelensky call’s transcript has been out in the public for weeks.
We all know what the call said.
Several of these witnesses listened to the call DIRECTLY (VIndman, etc.)
Kent and the other Trump officials were aware of the efforts headed up by Mayor Rudy for months to get an investigation of the Bidens going. There’s really not any questions here ... Mick Mulvaney stated that quid pro quos are common.
/shrug
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
I’ve responded to the clip repeatedly.
To reiterate: we have all been aware for weeks of the nature of the Trump-Zelensky call. The continuing complaints that this or that witness didn’t listen to the call directly are meaningless.
We know what was said. We have witnesses who were directly on the call at the time. They all know that Trump wanted the Ukrainians to investigate Biden. We all know the same thing.
It’s open and commonly known fact now. To quote Mulvaney: Get over it. LOL
originally posted by: Nickn3
Even if the the President had openly said he would withhold aid unless he got an investigation . I don’t see that as an impeachable act. Just business as usual in Washington.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lagomorphe
My claim: The Trump-Zelensky transcript has been in public view for weeks.
My evidence: The White House released the transcript on September 24, 2019. Source
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lagomorphe
My claim: The Trump-Zelensky transcript has been in public view for weeks.
My evidence: The White House released the transcript on September 24, 2019. Source
No links to obvious proof?
This is ATS...
Deny ignorance
originally posted by: Gryphon66
My claim: The Trump-Zelensky transcript has been in public view for weeks.
My evidence: The White House released the transcript on September 24, 2019. Source
originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOL. Right back at you.
I made a claim, and I established why I made the claim, and there’s zero way that anyone can deny my claim.
Period.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Lagomorphe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lagomorphe
My claim: The Trump-Zelensky transcript has been in public view for weeks.
My evidence: The White House released the transcript on September 24, 2019. Source
No links to obvious proof?
This is ATS...
Deny ignorance
LOL. Right back at you.
I made a claim, and I established why I made the claim, and there’s zero way that anyone can deny my claim.
Period.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOL. Right back at you.
I made a claim, and I established why I made the claim, and there’s zero way that anyone can deny my claim.
Period.
Wrong... actually it is pretty easy to prove you wrong... But first, stop going around in circles and excerpt from the transcript exactly what POTUS Trump said that you claim is illegal or wrong...