It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Notoneofyou
Pence would appoint a devout pro-lifer.
originally posted by: Swills
In this thread, conservatives excited a SCOTUS may die soon so Trump can appoint another conservative.
Pathetic.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Has Trump really made a good appointment other than Mattis, who quit? I have no idea why anyone would be excited about him appointing another derpy justice that some of us may be stuck with for the rest of our lives. It could realistically be Kid Rock or Ted Nugent. Balance of power is important. A partisan majority in the supreme court isn't good for any of us, and the many of you who drool over her possible death is disgusting.
He has made plenty....
Now imagine you only have 4 years guaranteed to do a job and make things right. How would you handle your subordinates?
"plenty"
Explain your position. All I see is that he appoints whichever friend of his that gives him the most money.
Exccept Mattis. Which you were all excited about. Until he left because Trump is retarded.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
If the Republicans wouldn't allow Obama to pick a justice in his last year even though the next President could have been a Dem, why should Trump be allowed to select a justice when he isn't guaranteed to win the election?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
If the Republicans wouldn't allow Obama to pick a justice in his last year
originally posted by: dogstar23
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Notoneofyou
Pence would appoint a devout pro-lifer.
Its unfortunate that to this day, that is still the focus for so many people. There's a huge amount of potential issues far more important to most of the citizens of, and the nation as a whole which the Supreme Court may decide on. Roe v Wade doesn't matter to me personally either way, so I would prefer the court not be weighed based on this one matter which so often clouds the issue of appointees.
originally posted by: circuitsports
a reply to: XCrycek
She should have retired a long time ago, she stays on to promote a political agenda, making her position there twice as bad.
Since the day I saw my daughter at 6 weeks dancing around on a sonagram I knew people like her are evil. I hope it's painfull to prepare her.
originally posted by: carewemust
A sad update.
mobile.twitter.com...