It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
......snipped.......
Like calling out someone that might then become endangered because of your actions.
Why did trump want to fire the IGIC before the complaint was lodged with congress?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Did I get in that conversation somewhere and not know it?
Actually I think the law says their job is protected.
But in this political theater of the absurd it safer for them I think if their identity is also kept secret.
Perhaps not the law but certainly common sense. Given the atmosphere ya know?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
"Bread and Circuses. How anyone can even take this seriously is a joke"
hee hee yeah its a big joke. Bet trump laughs himself to sleep every night.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
It’s sad how quickly the “law and order crowd” is willing to ignore the rule-of-law when they so choose.
We used to have a word for that: hypocrite.
Got a link to the law that says he can't be named and doesn't have to testify?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: DAVID64
Oh, Silly is actually worried? Could have fooled me. It seemed like a grand joke.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
And if it turns out they were privy to classified information?
I mean everybody got clearance with this guy didn't they?
Martha the maid has full clearance I hear. LOL
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
It’s sad how quickly the “law and order crowd” is willing to ignore the rule-of-law when they so choose.
We used to have a word for that: hypocrite.
Got a link to the law that says he can't be named and doesn't have to testify?
The Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act of 1998 and associated EOs and subsequent legislation. On my phone now, will link later for you.
As a matter of fact, if Ciaramela is a contractor and not a direct employee for the CIA then he can even be fired and have charges brought against him....courtesy of Obama's Presidential Policy Directive 19....remember Snowden?
originally posted by: tanstaafl
1à aquote]originally posted by: Gryphon66
It’s sad how quickly the “law and order crowd” is willing to ignore the rule-of-law when they so choose.