It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

“He’s Not Voldemort… Eric Ciaramella Is a Deep State Conspirator”

page: 2
30
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 07:44 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 07:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust
......snipped.......

Like calling out someone that might then become endangered because of your actions.
Why did trump want to fire the IGIC before the complaint was lodged with congress?


Still waiting for that link to that law that says he can't be named and doesn't have to testify.....outside of that, your argument means absolutely nothing.
edit on Wed Nov 13 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 07:50 AM
link   
a reply to: kwakakev




Bread and Circuses. How anyone can even take this seriously is a joke


hee hee yeah its a big joke. Bet trump laughs himself to sleep every night.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 07:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Did I get in that conversation somewhere and not know it?

Actually I think the law says their job is protected.

But in this political theater of the absurd it safer for them I think if their identity is also kept secret.
Perhaps not the law but certainly common sense. Given the atmosphere ya know?



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 07:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
It’s sad how quickly the “law and order crowd” is willing to ignore the rule-of-law when they so choose.

Ummm... what law is being ignored again?



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 07:57 AM
link   
were common sense to rule the day NONE OF THIS WOULD BE OCCURRING

lol

so then no law about the "whistleblower"?

just more bs from the bs crew



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 07:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Did I get in that conversation somewhere and not know it?

Actually I think the law says their job is protected.

But in this political theater of the absurd it safer for them I think if their identity is also kept secret.
Perhaps not the law but certainly common sense. Given the atmosphere ya know?


Common sense went out the door LONG ago....or did you forget Maxine calling for harrassment of Trump supporters?

Congratulations....Obama created the atmosphere.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 07:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
"Bread and Circuses. How anyone can even take this seriously is a joke"

hee hee yeah its a big joke. Bet trump laughs himself to sleep every night.

I guarantee you he is doing just that.

Stay tuned silly, it is only going to get better.

This morning should be a blast, watching Schiff try to prevent Nunes from ripping Taylors testimony to shreds.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Gryphon66
It’s sad how quickly the “law and order crowd” is willing to ignore the rule-of-law when they so choose.

We used to have a word for that: hypocrite.


Got a link to the law that says he can't be named and doesn't have to testify?


The Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act of 1998 and associated EOs and subsequent legislation. On my phone now, will link later for you.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:01 AM
link   
This whole impeachment deal is nothing but a sham...

Let the Demmies have their fun....when it gets to the Senate and the Dem's can't block witnesses....the real show will begin.

This week is nothing more than popcorn fodder. Have fun.


I refuse to watch it....I have better things to do with my time. Like preparing to move.
edit on 13-11-2019 by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:01 AM
link   
a reply to: madmac5150

I just wanna say to all who hope this President by some evil
is forced out office. You better pray you don't get you're
way. Because no one Rep or Dem or anyone would or could have
done what Donald Trump has done for this country. And if
you do get what you want? We are all screwed.

When Trump is gone you're the ones who will cry the loudest.
That's when you'll finally see how blind you have been with
your silly unfounded hate. You really are blind to what you
truly want.

Disaster.


edit on 13-11-2019 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe
the law limits what the ig can do
nothing more
tho they will attempt to pretend it does

or use "common sense"
lol

joe told jim that fred had 2 scoops of ice cream.....
some whistleblower
too bad they will have to reveal who gave them classified info



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:08 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Yeah those dark circles under his eyes says just that.

Trust me babe I am staying tuned.

Lets see what Nunes is able to do with the truth. If he can even handle it.
If he brings up debunked conspiracy theories he is going to be laughed out of his seat.

Personally I can't wait for the next hour to pass.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: DAVID64

Oh, Silly is actually worried? Could have fooled me. It seemed like a grand joke.


Joke ?
Nah, just the usual hypocrisy from the Left. They will go to greats lengths to rationalize and excuse violence against Conservatives, but let one of their own get outed and the pearl clutching is epic.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:13 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

And if it turns out they were privy to classified information?
I mean everybody got clearance with this guy didn't they?
Martha the maid has full clearance I hear. LOL



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

And if it turns out they were privy to classified information?
I mean everybody got clearance with this guy didn't they?
Martha the maid has full clearance I hear. LOL

Too bad you still lack understanding how that subject works.
One is not even allowed to converse with their spouse about such.
Let alone a "whistleblower"......



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Gryphon66
It’s sad how quickly the “law and order crowd” is willing to ignore the rule-of-law when they so choose.

We used to have a word for that: hypocrite.


Got a link to the law that says he can't be named and doesn't have to testify?


The Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act of 1998 and associated EOs and subsequent legislation. On my phone now, will link later for you.


Nope....not a single thing in any of those says he can't be named nor doesn't have to testify. As a matter of fact, if Ciaramela is a contractor and not a direct employee for the CIA then he can even be fired and have charges brought against him....courtesy of Obama's Presidential Policy Directive 19....remember Snowden?



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: DAVID64

Why do you say I don't seem to care about anyone getting attacked?

Do you know me?

Don't make a fool of yourself. You do not know anything about what I think.
but let me tell you now that I am completely against any kind of violence against anyone so file that away for the future and don't make assumptions about me again okay?

Which back on topic.... is why its probably not smart to identify this guy. I dont just advocate for his safety its for everyone's safety.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe



As a matter of fact, if Ciaramela is a contractor and not a direct employee for the CIA then he can even be fired and have charges brought against him....courtesy of Obama's Presidential Policy Directive 19....remember Snowden?

good point
one that will be lost on most




posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl
1à aquote]originally posted by: Gryphon66
It’s sad how quickly the “law and order crowd” is willing to ignore the rule-of-law when they so choose.

Ummm... what law is being ignored again?

Rule-of-law is the phrase I used. Generally the belief that laws should be applied to all equally and fairly. Simple. Autocrats tend to only want to apply laws/rules to someone else and feel they (and their "side") shouldn't be bound that way because they (as opposed to Them) are good people. Both sides do it.



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join