It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

4 Key Pieces of Evidence Undermining Arguments For Impeachment

page: 1
34
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+5 more 
posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:00 PM
link   
The Republicans are gearing-up for the open House hearings starting Wednesday.

They have outlined 4 key points that demolish the Adam and Nancy SCIF show !!

All 4 are obvious and are not new.

The Points have been systematically sidelined by Democrats and the Democrat MSM.

By Friday, we might see Adam and Nancy doing a different drum dance !! 😃

So much BS from the MSM and Democrats 😆




1. The July 25 call summary — the best evidence of the conversation — shows no conditionality or evidence of pressure.

2. Both President Zelensky and President Trump have publicly and repeatedly said there was no pressure to investigate the President’s political rivals.

3. The Ukrainian government was not aware that U.S. security assistance was delayed at the time of the July 25 phone call.

4. The United States provided security assistance to Ukraine and President Trump met with President Zelensky without Ukraine ever investigating President Trump‘s political rivals.




House Republicans on Three Committees Release 4 Key Pieces of Evidence Undermining Dems’ Arguments For Impeachment Ahead of Public Hearings

House Republicans on three committees leading the “impeachment inquiry” released 4 key pieces of evidence undermining Democrats’ arguments for impeachment ahead of this week’s public hearings.

In a memorandum obtained by The Gateway Pundit sent to Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee, Committee on Oversight and Reform, and Committee on Foreign Affairs, the GOP countered all of the ‘evidence’ provided by the Democrats to launch an impeachment inquiry into President Trump.

Republicans argued that Pelosi unilaterally launched an impeachment inquiry alleging President Trump “jeopardized U.S. national security by pressuring Ukraine to initiate politically-motivated investigations that could interfere in U.S. domestic politics.

“The evidence, however, does not support this allegation,” Republican staffers began in an 18-page memo.







posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:02 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


1. The July 25 call summary — the best evidence of the conversation — shows no conditionality or evidence of pressure.

2. Both President Zelensky and President Trump have publicly and repeatedly said there was no pressure to investigate the President’s political rivals.

3. The Ukrainian government was not aware that U.S. security assistance was delayed at the time of the July 25 phone call.

4. The United States provided security assistance to Ukraine and President Trump met with President Zelensky without Ukraine ever investigating President Trump‘s political rivals.




Nothing to see here . Move On .........)



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:03 PM
link   
Democrats say forget about Quid-Quo-Pro. They will now "get Trump" for Bribery and Extortion.

Maybe they're going to try and project Biden's crimes to Trump?



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

I hear Adam Schiff is preparing a blockbuster opening statement!



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

I hear Adam Schiff is preparing a blockbuster opening statement!


It will be a real "peach" I'm sure 😃

And here's his "warning" ahead of time...........

Schiff Warns GOP Not to Name Whistleblower During Impeachment Hearings
😁

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) warned GOP lawmakers that anyone who unmasks the alleged impeachment whistleblower during public hearings could face a House ethics investigation.

The first public hearings are slated to start on Wednesday, Nov. 13, and will feature testimonies from former diplomat Bill Taylor and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs.

In a memo to the panel’s members on Tuesday, Schiff wrote that “it is important to underscore that the House’s impeachment inquiry, and the Committee, will not serve as venues for any Member to further the same sham investigations into the Bidens or into debunked conspiracies about 2016 U.S. election interference.” His memo didn’t elaborate on the “debunked conspiracies” or “sham investigations.”


edit on Nov-12-2019 by xuenchen because: 🍌banana 🍌democrats 🍌



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

They miss the best argument

Trump is right to want to investigate Joe Biden and the Obama admin and their admitted extortion and quid pro quo using 1 billion US tax dollars to fire the prosecutor looking into to bidens sons company.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Its really that simple. It doesnt matter if trump used quid pro quo (he didnt based on thetranscript and zelenkys statements). Any time an executive offical uses huge sums of our tax dollars to force the firing of someone looking into their families business, they need to be investigated.

Therefore there is no cause for impeachment.



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats say forget about Quid-Quo-Pro. They will now "get Trump" for Bribery and Extortion.

Maybe they're going to try and project Biden's crimes to Trump?


I think some of the Democrat BS so far has been attempts to shift guilt away from Biden 😁


+4 more 
posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats say forget about Quid-Quo-Pro. They will now "get Trump" for Bribery and Extortion.

Maybe they're going to try and project Biden's crimes to Trump?


I've said this before, but does this set a precedent that the US can no longer use foreign aid to shift consensus on climate change policies or human rights abuses?

Because that might be seen as "bribery" or extorting" a country to change its ways.




posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats say forget about Quid-Quo-Pro. They will now "get Trump" for Bribery and Extortion.

Maybe they're going to try and project Biden's crimes to Trump?


I've said this before, but does this set a precedent that the US can no longer use foreign aid to shift consensus on climate change policies or human rights abuses?

Because that might be seen as "bribery" or extorting" a country to change its ways.



ooHH OOhh 😃 🥥



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Rudy Giuliani was gathering evidence against DNC/Hillary/Bidens before Joe Biden said he was running for President.

The new Ukraine Admin said the State Dept and DOJ didn't want the evidence, so Rudy went to collect it.



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Adam Schiff's great uncle Jacob Schiff was one of the financiers of the October Revolution. Hmm....




www.tomatobubble.com...



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Good points! If Democrats impeach based on Bribery and Extortion, the U.S. might as well stop interacting with other countries. Our hands will be tied.



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: xuenchen


Adam Schiff's great uncle Jacob Schiff was one of the financiers of the October Revolution. Hmm....




www.tomatobubble.com...


Very Possible !!!!! 😎




posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler



Hunter was the " Go Between " for the Ukrainian Government and John Kerry during the Obama Administration . CONFIRMED .



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:17 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah , I guess Overthrowing Governments Runs in the Family ..(



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats say forget about Quid-Quo-Pro. They will now "get Trump" for Bribery and Extortion.

Maybe they're going to try and project Biden's crimes to Trump?


I've said this before, but does this set a precedent that the US can no longer use foreign aid to shift consensus on climate change policies or human rights abuses?

Because that might be seen as "bribery" or extorting" a country to change its ways.



It wont matter. Do you reallythink the democrats will leave a little thing like them being blatant hypocrites stop them fro doing exactly what they say it is criminal for trump to do?

heck we already see it.

Biden admitted to a quid pro quo. They say thats perfectly fine. They say other countries and the IMF approved of the quid pro quo, so it was ok.

They dont even care that the reasoning for Biden and obama wanting the prosecutor fired looking into bidens sons company and its owner was clearly a lie, as as soon as the prosecutor was fired, the Obama allied NABU got the case, and promptly let off the corrupt (biden and Obamas opinion) zlochevsky off the hook with a small fine.

They will say its fine to withhold aid for climate change, immigration issues etc.

Heck the dems would argue its fine for their president to not give congressional approved aid until the country getting it donates to the dnc, and they will say thats perfectly fine it was for a good cause.

They are shameless.



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Yeah, a damned shame but you're probably right.

It's not like they abide by the same standards they demand of us.



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:25 PM
link   
It's Over Yall


Trump's F#d



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: stosh64
It's Over Yall


Trump's F#d


Hilarious!!!!



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats say forget about Quid-Quo-Pro. They will now "get Trump" for Bribery and Extortion.

Maybe they're going to try and project Biden's crimes to Trump?


It's also abuse of power...Trump had no authority to withhold congressionally approved money, they say...

Bribery and Extortion did not have to take place...They KNOW that Trump 'intended' to commit these crimes...Trump is guilty because of intent...Hillary was innocent due to lack of intent...

Plus the crime of asking a foreign gov't to interfere in an American election...

And all dip shiff has to do is sell it to the mental midgets of the Democrat party with the help of the completely corrupted news media...And that'll be an easy sell...



new topics

top topics



 
34
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join