It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Caractacus
Perhaps this whistleblower does not want to reveal he is a government employee
Why does his reporting about what he has heard through second hand reporting not qualify as relevant info?
If he is not a government employee, why is his whistleblowing any less meaningful?
Wouldn’t enquiring about this persons positive range his life?
originally posted by: SKEPTEK
The hammer better drop hard on these Coup participants or our republic is done for.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Caractacus
Endanger his life
You have no definitive proof this man is not a government employee
Seeking questions into his position may endanger his life, so claim the democrats with their whistle blower
originally posted by: Caractacus
originally posted by: YouSir
originally posted by: Caractacus
a reply to: xuenchen
Looking at the Gofundme page, it is for the Whistle-blower's Attorneys, not directly for the Whistle blower.
Not sure if that still qualifies under whatever statute is mentioned.
Ummm...Ohhh...Ohhhhh...it's to pay the rumor mongers attorney fees...not for the rumor monger...is that right...?
Which would still make these donations...for...the rumor monger...
Not sure if that is how it works.
On that page the Attorneys also explain they are representing a second Whistleblower as well?
My other thought is that Rudy Giuliani has claimed he has been working for President Trump and his campaign for over a year now "Pro Bono", would that qualify as undeclared campaign contributions?
I am not a lawyer. I am just pointing out that these contributions are to the Attorneys, not the Whistle Blower and the original article failed to mention that and I suspect it is relevant to the claim.