It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Televised Impeachment Inquiry Nov. 13th. I invite ATS members to utilize this thread

page: 4
23
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 02:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Adam schiff orders Republicans not to say the name Eric ciaramella during the hearings.

mobile.twitter.com...



But? Schiff ..........

Only Illegal for Intel IG to Name ‘Whistleblower’: ‘No Overarching’ Identity Protection

The law does not explicitly prevent anyone other than the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) who received the complaint that triggered the impeachment inquiry from outing the identity of the so-called “whistleblower,” several mainstream media outlets have conceded in recent days.
Even left-wing mainstream media outlets—CNN, the New York Times, National Public Radio (NPR), and Reuters — determined that, certainly, no law prohibits President Donald Trump or members of Congress from disclosing the name of the leaker who sparked the impeachment inquiry.




posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 03:03 PM
link   



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 05:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Here They Come !!!!!!!! 😃 😃

Rep. Dan Bishop Names Alleged Impeachment ‘Whistleblower’: ‘He’s Not Voldemort’



Even without exposing Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella, his attorney, and Adam Schiff, as frauds who orchestrated this impeachment coup, Republicans will be ready to dismantle the Democrat sham in tomorrow's open hearings.

Republican Counterpoints: www.thegatewaypundit.com... public-hearings/



posted on Nov, 12 2019 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

And that is exactly the point of this open hearing. We have been told by democrats now for quite a while that they have the goods and they dribble them out in bits and pieces. We all should hope that these hearings clear these things up.So,,,,
See you tomorrow.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 01:14 AM
link   
Something for the pre-hearing jitters ....

vellie intalesting 😎

The Role of OMB in Withholding Ukrainian Aid



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 01:59 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

UPDATE: Ukraine did not know the money was being held until a "Sr. Admin Official" leaked it to POLITICO and someone told Ukraine about it, on or about August 28, 2019.

www.westernjournal.com...

As the article points out, this kills off any notion of a Quid-Quo-Pro. And verifies that President Zelensky was telling the truth when he said he was unaware that military aid was being withheld, while talking with President Trump.




posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:11 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust
oops
seems game set and match
wonder "who" leaked it???

bet they know....



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:13 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

from your link:


All of this means that a senior administration official single-handedly created the security aid quid pro quo story for the media to broadcast everywhere. He leaked it to Politico and Politico ran the story two weeks to the day after the so-called whistleblower filed his official complaint.

If all of this sounds familiar, that’s because it is the exact play Democrats and the establishment media used to spin up the Russia collusion fraud in 2017.


It will be interesting to see if this info is outed today



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:17 AM
link   
Interesting how the memo that was made available will be interpreted to the public today.
Will the info from the President of Ukraine be brought up?
He indicated no pressure and no corruption.
And he was actually a participant on the call in question.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:34 AM
link   
Not interested in this sham investigation and partisan hearing, that is exactly what it is.

The House impeachment resolution is a partisan effort that saw ZERO Republican support and TWO Democrat defectors.

Mitch McConnell has stated that the Senate will not convict and remove based off the same regurgitated nonsense.

Regardless if Chief Justice is presiding over it, Senate has final say.

Graham says that if the actual SPY doesn't get called, this thing is DOA at the Senate as well.

The Democrats have nothing solid and the so called "mounting" evidence by our lost leftist users is merely projection as they mingle about in their vapid echo chambers.

Carry on with business as usual and make sure to temper that fire and vote for President Trump in 2020.

#Trump2020



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:36 AM
link   
hmm...
the white house has a "rapid response" team to push back on the house dems bs today

this will be interesting
seeing the potus response in real time is unprecedented

trump is using social media unlike any politician prior



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Have either of the two "testifying" today said anything about talking directly with the potus?

Or will this just be more rumors from the peanut gallery?



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: carewemust

from your link:


All of this means that a senior administration official single-handedly created the security aid quid pro quo story for the media to broadcast everywhere. He leaked it to Politico and Politico ran the story two weeks to the day after the so-called whistleblower filed his official complaint.

If all of this sounds familiar, that’s because it is the exact play Democrats and the establishment media used to spin up the Russia collusion fraud in 2017.


It will be interesting to see if this info is outed today




Unlikely - the impeachment sham has hand picked Democrat witnesses and no one else.
No point watching. It's just political porn for the desperate Democrat echo chamber.

edit on 13/11/2019 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 08:59 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

The accuser is the United States Congress.

Or the IGIC who found the information worthy of their scrutiny.

Of course we are now hearing through the grapevine that trump tried to fire the guy when he heard he was going to turn the story over and he was talked out of it. My he sounds so confident of his innocence. The perfection of his actions.

Never mind the witnesses who will be testifying over the coming days. Under oath.
and when they go forward with an impeachment trial he will get the chance to face his accuser. Not that he will. He has a problem telling the truth.
What could he possibly ask of the whistleblower?
Didn't everyone in that circle have top secret clearance?



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 09:01 AM
link   
a reply to: smurfy

The hearings today have not started yet.
10AM EST



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 09:04 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth



No point watching. It's just political porn for the desperate Democrat echo chamber.

The house dems have pushed rumors into an impeachment investigation.
It does not get much more dangerous than that.
Not a single piece of evidence has been submitted.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 09:05 AM
link   
I'm hoping DNC criminals get hauled out in hand cuffs live on MSM.

I'm used to being disappointed.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 09:06 AM
link   
a reply to: ChefFox

Why dont you wait until they actually start talking before making a decision?
Lets see what this testimony does to public sentiment about trump.

He sure seems to get booed a lot when he goes out in public these days.
Thats gotta hurt.

I think its starting now.



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 09:09 AM
link   
Interesting schiff will make the rules as he goes.....
or not



posted on Nov, 13 2019 @ 09:15 AM
link   
Is this more "parody"?
I can't tell.....




top topics



 
23
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join