It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Eric Ciamella named the whistleblower by MSM
originally posted by: tinner07
a reply to: Goedhardt
try not to get so excited next time... Breathe and use English.... You will get your stars and flags....
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Goedhardt
I honestly don't care who the wb is.
It's the info that mattered not the messenger.
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
The left should want his name out there. If Trump retaliates, thats a violation he could actually go down for.
a reply to: Krakatoa
So, you don't care if the info came from someone with no first hand knowledge of the topic?
Or that there is no way to corroborate what the info says?
Or that the WB may just be a vengeful person looking to get back at someone for being wronged?
Or that the info came from someone with a dangerous political agenda?
Without those questions answered, the info is worth as much as my (or your) opinion, which is zero.
I guess that since it fits your own personal bias, it wouldn't matter.
originally posted by: tinner07
a reply to: Krakatoa
So, you don't care if the info came from someone with no first hand knowledge of the topic?
Or that there is no way to corroborate what the info says?
Or that the WB may just be a vengeful person looking to get back at someone for being wronged?
Or that the info came from someone with a dangerous political agenda?
Without those questions answered, the info is worth as much as my (or your) opinion, which is zero.
I guess that since it fits your own personal bias, it wouldn't matter.
Pretty sure that has all been covered unless you keep your head in the sand, which covers your personal bias on this
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
The left should want his name out there. If Trump retaliates, thats a violation he could actually go down for.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
The left should want his name out there. If Trump retaliates, thats a violation he could actually go down for.
And, what if one his supporters retaliate? Will Trump go down for that?
What if one of his supporters retaliates against one of this man's family members? Will Trump go down for that?
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
The left should want his name out there. If Trump retaliates, thats a violation he could actually go down for.
And, what if one his supporters retaliate? Will Trump go down for that?
What if one of his supporters retaliates against one of this man's family members? Will Trump go down for that?
Will those supporters be in a position to retaliate against his job? Since, that is what the WB laws protect.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
The left should want his name out there. If Trump retaliates, thats a violation he could actually go down for.
And, what if one his supporters retaliate? Will Trump go down for that?
What if one of his supporters retaliates against one of this man's family members? Will Trump go down for that?
Will those supporters be in a position to retaliate against his job? Since, that is what the WB laws protect.
Thanks for revealing your real motive for wanting the whistle blower's name exposed to the general public. It's not about protecting him from losing his job any more. It's about public blood lust, retaliation that may result in violence, threatening the man named, his friends and his family with of loss of life, limb and property.
Someone needs a skull.
And, there is no verification that this is even the original whistle blower, someone who may have been caught up in the bureaucracy of it all, or someone that has nothing to do with it whatsoever.
originally posted by: tinner07
Why does the WB even matter now?
You are all caught up in that...why? cuz you have nothing else.