It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SailorJerry
Senator Lindsey Graham says if the Whistleblower does not testify, impeachment is Dead on Arrival at the front door of the US Senate.
So, no different than what’s going to happen anyway?
originally posted by: Dwoodward85
a reply to: xuenchen
Let us say for a second that everything the Democrats have hoaxed...I mean discovered, sorry slip of the keys. What does it mean that they got the evidence under false information or false witnesses. Basically what would it mean if the original claim that got this whole thing started was PROVEN to be false, what does that mean for the other evidence? I ask not because I think Trump is guilty of anything but because they did the same with the whole Russiagate falsehoods and was wondering what would happen if it was based on lies...again.
originally posted by: RickinVa
If this was an actual court of law, how far do you honestly think it would go if the prosecution refused to allow the defense to question the accuser?
Bout as far as this whole crap festival is going to go.
I can't believe anyone with more than one brain cell can't see exactly whats going on. It's beyond ridiculous at this point.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
And an "informer" is not an "accuser.". And in court, the accused hasn't a right to question who informed the prosecutor.
originally posted by: xuenchen
What ARE Democrats so afraid of anyway ?