It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
So what happened? Did anyone get verbally suplexed?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Grambler
I'll check it out for laughs.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I was waiting for the 'yo mamma' jokes next.
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: bastion
Truth be told. My favorite part about the whole incident was the video he posted it .
He said do any of the other Trump supporters âhave any ballsâ .
Pure redneck I can relate to that.
But apparently thatâs the problem many people had on the thread they donât have any .
started off with him asking me what sexual acts I perform on my boyfriend, and if as a fat guy I am jealous of Michael Moore
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Stuttering beard stubble open sweat glands and chairs collapsing you shouldâve been there .
Good times
I don't always agree to Grambler, but the guy makes a stand up effort to have good discussions with people... Which is what ATS is supposed to be about.
You used the opportunity in an interview to just make personal attacks. What few "points" you had fell flat on their face (almost every participant in this thread already pointed this out precious to the video)
Is it your position that if someone breaks a law in the process of expressing their self or giving their opinion.
Their position/opinion/ expression shouldnât be acknowledged by anyone even the people that consider it their right to hear the position â?
I haven't understood your point(s) about how this case has anything in common with those who fought for civil rights though
originally posted by: Fallingdown
Me: Hoyt has the right to be *heard . ( *figuratively not literally )
originally posted by: Fallingdown
They just completely ignored the intent of my position play semantics .
So you agreed he has the first amendment right to his expression.
Yes, but he didn't have the right to destroy someones property... And he should be punished for that,
Hatâs off Hoyt do what needs to be done and be willing to take the consequences
just as any other political extremist should who destroys property.
What he did was wrong. He has nothing in common with those who fought or civil rights.