It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You're talking to someone who has been an ATS member (and lurker before that) for almost 20 years total, and I'm not gonna play your little "yes or no" games, kiddo.
Are you honestly asking if I trust the Federal Government to responsibly handle a DNA database? LMAO
Trump has no bearing on the answer to that question.
has been the same to that question since way before Trump even considered running for office, and the fact that he's in it right now has zero chance of of changing my mind.
My answer
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Fallingdown
they haven’t been violated but some people in this thread think they should have.
How? Destruction of property is not a right, nor is it protected speech.
If his Constitutional rights have not been violated why in the hell do you keep talking about rights violations, since this thread is, in fact, about Hoyt?
If you look through my post when somebody ask me a question I answer because I’m not ashamed of my opinion like you are
or its violating his first amendment rights.
The right to peaceful freedom of expression comes in many forms: speech, a MAGA hat, a baby Trump balloon. They all apply, and Hoyt infringed on their 1st amendment rights when he destroyed their property which was a part of their peaceful protest. Sorry, but your understanding of the 1st is mistaken.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: Fallingdown
You must be one of those newfangled "Big Government" conservatives who thinks more federal bureaucracy is a good thing, and that the Federal Government would surely be responsible with something like a DNA database because it's "for the children", and because TRUMP!!!
LMAO
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Grambler
Yeah I said I was wrong on that. But you know it. You’re just angry because I made fun of your #ty little YouTube channel .
Would you spend 12 pages condemning this guy’s actions like you did Hoyts ?
originally posted by: redmage
If there were a thread dedicated to it, I had the time, and someone was misguided enough to repeatedly attempt to justify that criminal activity... then it's quite possible that I would.
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Grambler
TLDR
So your position is if you break a law in the process of expressing yourself or giving your opinion.
Your position/opinion/ expression shouldn’t be acknowledged .
The right to peaceful freedom of expression comes in many forms: speech, a MAGA hat, a baby Trump balloon. They all apply, and Hoyt infringed on their 1st amendment rights when he destroyed their property which was a part of their peaceful protest. Sorry, but your understanding of the 1st is mistaken.
originally posted by: Fallingdown
Will you condemn liberals for tearing MAGA hats off of children’s head as a violation of the First Amendment rights .
originally posted by: redmage
There's no excuse for violence, or destruction of others' property from either side.
I also detest your position on exploitation of children .
Nowhere in there does it condemn liberals for violating peoples rights by stealing MAGA hats.
You’re just angry because I made fun of your #ty little YouTube channel .
Round and round we go! LOL