Alabama man arrested for slashing baby Trump Balloon .

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
And they were both punished, despite that difference.

Yup, one simply got interviewed and a little media "talk of the day", and the vandal was arrested.

And her career was ruined by it, she admitted.

a reply to: redmage

Watch this I going to do something you’re incapable of .

I’ll be honest .

I misread that statement “I was wrong”.

Those words have probably never crossed your lips .

a reply to: Fallingdown

I said you have the right to exercise it right or left but you might have to pay some consequences.

It's not a right if it's illegal.

originally posted by: Fallingdown
You think tearing off Trump supporters hats is OK .

Now you're definitely lying because I've argued in this very thread that MAGA hats are a valid and protected form of freedom of expression. The exact opposite of what you're claiming of my position here.

a reply to: Liquesence

You keep repeating that line. Did you read the OP? I said be ready to pay the consequences .


Do you mean like when the Boston tea party patriots threw the tea in the Boston Harbor ??

a reply to: redmage

OK prove me wrong.

Give me your clear opinion right now on social justice warriors that tear the hats off of Trump supporters .

I seriously doubt you can, you will just allude to you made that point clear .

Can you say it in your own words right now ?

Let’s hear it ?

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Subaeruginosa

Let’s just say what I’ve been saying for pages. I might not like it if they did that to my car. But they can choose how to express theirself as long as they’re willing to except the consequences. Did you miss the OP and all the First Amendment stuff ?

And what are the consequences they would have to accept?

I have no idea what you are trying to say.

If you had it your way, what would be different about this situation?

Do you feel he should be punished for what he did legally?

Would you somehow force us posters to listen to his message?

Do you find someone saying a persons comments are "null and void" a violation of that persons first amendment?

Are we forced to listen to this person because he wanted to express himself?

People have repeatedly said this guy has the right to free speech, but he has no right to have us listen to him. Are you suggesting otherwise?

a reply to: Grambler

And what are the consequences they would have to accept?

Arrest .

There’s plenty of people worldwide in jail for speaking their political thoughts . Does that mean we shouldn’t listen to them ?

The rest of your post is more of the same that’s all I need to address .

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Liquesence

You keep repeating that line. Did your radio P I said be ready to pay the consequences .

Do you mean like when the Boston tea party patriots through the tea in the Boston Harbor ??

An individual is free to destroy private property. An individual does not have the *right* to destroy private property.

There you again about the Boston Teas party.

There is no comparison between the two.

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: redmage

OK prove me wrong.

Give me your clear opinion right now on social justice warriors that tear the hats off of Trump supporters .

I seriously doubt you can, you will just allude to you made that point clear .

Can you say it in your own words right now ?

Let’s hear it ?

Are you seriously this dense?

I said it on page 11, and even had to quote it again on page 12 for you.

originally posted by: redmage
The right to peaceful freedom of expression comes in many forms: speech, a MAGA hat, a baby Trump balloon. They all apply, and Hoyt infringed on their 1st amendment rights when he destroyed their property which was a part of their peaceful protest.

a reply to: redmage

Like I predicted you would allude back to another post .

Can you say it in your own words ?

a reply to: Fallingdown

It's my post.

Those are my words.

I wasn't quoting someone else.

a reply to: Liquesence

An individual is free to destroy private property. An individual does not have the *right* to destroy private property.

Never said they had the right you’re lying .

An individual is free to destroy private property. An individual does not have the *right* to destroy private property.

Members of the Boston tea party destroyed private property. It belonged to the east Indian company and their investors .

Explain to me why there’s no comparison .

You can’t .

a reply to: Fallingdown

Like I predicted you would allude back to another post .

Can you say it in your own words ?

Can you answer my question "Why are his actions patriotic?" in your own words without alluding to your "I already answered it" previous post?

I've asked it probably half a dozen times now and you won't directly answer. Why?

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Grambler

And what are the consequences they would have to accept?

Arrest .

There’s plenty of people worldwide in jail for speaking their political thoughts . Does that mean we shouldn’t listen to them ?

The rest of your post is more of the same that’s all I need to address .

Have you listened to all of my youtube videos?

If not, how dare you take away my first amendment right!!!!

a reply to: Grambler

I can't believe he's denying your 1st amendment rights like that. Someone should arrest him!

a reply to: redmage

That shows how dishonest you are and how fragile the house of cards you built is .

I expected nothing less.

Let’s try another question the left hates to answer .

Was trumps policy of gene testing immigrant children before release to help insure they aren’t victims of slave or sex trafficking a good thing yes or no ?

I’m just getting a litmus test on why are you are in this discussion in the first place .

a reply to: Grambler

No offense but I haven’t listen to one.

I never listen to opinion YouTube videos they are designed to convince not inform .

a reply to: Fallingdown

Explain to me why there’s no comparison .

You can’t .

I did.

Here

Two vastly different reasons.

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Grambler

No offense but I haven’t listen to one.

I never listen to opinion YouTube videos they are designed to convince not inform .

So you admit to denying me my first amendment right

How dare you criticize others on this thread for not listening to hoyt as violating his first amendment right, when you refuse to listen to me

Why is it ok for you to pick and chose who to listen to; we all have a first amendment right to have you listen to us!