It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: redmage
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
And they were both punished, despite that difference.
Yup, one simply got interviewed and a little media "talk of the day", and the vandal was arrested.
I said you have the right to exercise it right or left but you might have to pay some consequences.
originally posted by: Fallingdown
You think tearing off Trump supporters hats is OK .
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
Let’s just say what I’ve been saying for pages. I might not like it if they did that to my car. But they can choose how to express theirself as long as they’re willing to except the consequences. Did you miss the OP and all the First Amendment stuff ?
And what are the consequences they would have to accept?
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Liquesence
You keep repeating that line. Did your radio P I said be ready to pay the consequences .
Do you mean like when the Boston tea party patriots through the tea in the Boston Harbor ??
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: redmage
OK prove me wrong.
Give me your clear opinion right now on social justice warriors that tear the hats off of Trump supporters .
I seriously doubt you can, you will just allude to you made that point clear .
Can you say it in your own words right now ?
Let’s hear it ?
originally posted by: redmage
The right to peaceful freedom of expression comes in many forms: speech, a MAGA hat, a baby Trump balloon. They all apply, and Hoyt infringed on their 1st amendment rights when he destroyed their property which was a part of their peaceful protest.
An individual is free to destroy private property. An individual does not have the *right* to destroy private property.
An individual is free to destroy private property. An individual does not have the *right* to destroy private property.
Like I predicted you would allude back to another post .
Can you say it in your own words ?
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Grambler
And what are the consequences they would have to accept?
Arrest .
There’s plenty of people worldwide in jail for speaking their political thoughts . Does that mean we shouldn’t listen to them ?
The rest of your post is more of the same that’s all I need to address .
Explain to me why there’s no comparison .
You can’t .
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: Grambler
No offense but I haven’t listen to one.
I never listen to opinion YouTube videos they are designed to convince not inform .