It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Was The Kentucky Election Stolen?

page: 4
36
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ahabstar

I remember the case. One lady who really wanted Obama to win.

Is that what you were talking about? WHy would that disillusion me?


One lady and that's it?

Did you mentally blank out the Jill Stein recount and some of the irregularities found there?


WASHINGTON — Green Party nominee Jill Stein’s presidential vote recount in Michigan may have turned up massive voter irregularities — in the Democratic stronghold of Detroit.

Now it’s Republican leaders who are demanding an investigation to determine why a third of the city’s voting machines registered more ballots than actual voters, the Detroit News reported.


Michigan recount reveals error

Several different cases of voter fraud in Hillary's case, if you were brave enough to not use Google as your search engine and look around a bit.

Lots and lots of cases of Democrats fudging the vote in their favor for years and years and years...

ETA... You're not actually going to look for yourself so let's start you down that painful road to self-awareness...

No, voter fraud isn't a myth: 10 cases where it's all too real



edit on 9-11-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

The article provided by Ahabstar regards one lady.

As far as Michigan, ask Ruth Johnson, I think she knows more about the facts on the ground than the New York Post.

ETA: WOW, the New York Post and the Moonie Times ... no bias in either of those sources,eh?

Voter fraud is minuscule. There are good reasons why it doesn’t make sense ... but you are right, I’m not going to fight you source for source.

If Bevin has evidence, let him bring it. If he was cheated, let him prove it.
edit on 9-11-2019 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
You really can’t make this stuff up. Every damn time.

The reality of the situation is, of course, almost exactly opposite to how it was portrayed by the OP.

WYMT - CBS




FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) - A Kentucky judge has ordered the State Board of Elections to return the names of about 175,000 voters to the regular voter rolls. Franklin County Circuit Judge Thomas Wingate issued the ruling Monday in a lawsuit filed last week by the Kentucky Democratic Party. The lawsuit contends placing those voters' names on an "inactive list" could infringe on their right to vote. News outlets report Wingate ordered the board to return the names of all Kentucky voters to one master list and place an asterisk by the names of voters whose addresses need confirmation.


So no, voters were not added to the voting rolls they were restored to the voting rolls because they had been removed unfairly.

There is zero evidence of any voter fraud or election fraud in the KY elections.

You’d never know that from the OP’s presentation, though.


You do know the Feds are the ones that call for the striking of ineligible voters from the voter rolls , correct ?
No ?
You do now.
I'm a thinkin they were removed for a reason .
And some crooked judge ordered em back on.

Same thing happened here in Georgia
Old "Whats her name ?" requested voters be added back .
Georgia stated not just no but hell no.
They were removed per voter regulations , and the Feds upheld it.
Kentucky needs to clean their judicial swamp .



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

The article provided by Ahabstar regards one lady.

As far as Michigan, ask Ruth Johnson, I think she knows more about the facts on the ground than the New York Post.


Or she's just a partisan hack.

SoOo...

How does a Libertarian champion the left all the time?

Since the current Democratic party is technically the antithesis of Libertarianism.




posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Are you a thinkin’ that?

The KY judge disagrees with you.

Voter roll purges are used to suppress votes. Kemp did it in GA successfully in 2018.



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

From the link:

1. Melowese Richardson Poll Worker six counts.
2. Sister Marguerite Kloos filled out and submitted an absentee ballot for another nun, Sister Rose Marie Hewitt, who had died before absentee ballots were sent out.
3. Russell Glassop voted for his wife who died the day before the election.
4. 5. & 6. Are three other cases of suspected fraud in Hamilton County (Cincinnati area).

Do I have to read the articles too and post them as YouTube videos?



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

LOL ... a partisan hack? Like the Post and the Times?

And the Republcian Party isn’t?

I don’t “champion the left” I champion the facts.

I’m a newly minted Libertarian having just joined a couple of months ago.

Feel free to call me out on the facts, anytime.



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


ETA: WOW, the New York Post and the Moonie Times ... no bias in either of those sources,eh?

Voter fraud is minuscule. There are good reasons why it doesn’t make sense ... but you are right, I’m not going to fight you source for source.

If Bevin has evidence, let him bring it. If he was cheated, let him prove it.


Can't debunk the article so attack the source.

Seems familiar.

At the end of the day, in most Federal elections a Republican has to deal with the 7-8% bonus the Democrats get with voter fraud.

So has it gone from "it never happens" to "minuscule" with you now?

You're getting there.

And I'm off to watch a movie.

G'night!




posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Ahabstar

So eleven total, six by the same lady?

Knock yourself out on the YouTube vids ... free country.



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Cherry-picking my quotes now? LOL

You damned my source, so you’re just as “guilty.”

/shrug

Nite Lumi.




posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks
No.

Believe it or not people are voting Democratic. Even in places like Kentucky.

Scary thought I know.

Including Republicans who don't live in Kentucky and are not even US citizens?



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Voter roll purges are to eliminate people that may have died, moved, won’t respond to mailings ahead of purging or have not voted in a set number of years. All of which can disqualify a voter.

Otherwise Ohio might have something like 700 electoral votes to California’s 55 given the number of past residents.



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: Gryphon66

Voter roll purges are to eliminate people that may have died, moved, won’t respond to mailings ahead of purging or have not voted in a set number of years. All of which can disqualify a voter.

Otherwise Ohio might have something like 700 electoral votes to California’s 55 given the number of past residents.


Ah yes, the anecdotal claims of the dead voting ... I’m surprised you went with OH ... the standard patter is Chicago.

From the 20s.



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

I mentioned Chicago earlier. I try not to repeat myself too much.



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: Gryphon66

I mentioned Chicago earlier. I try not to repeat myself too much.


See.

Par for the course.


Voter fraud and election fraud should be rooted out and prevented. I’m in favor of Voter ID. You know as well as I do though, that purging the voter rolls is used illicitly as well as to preserve integrity.

Or I think you do ... perhaps I’m wrong.
edit on 9-11-2019 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:47 PM
link   
I see a time where elections are not won or lost by the number of votes, but by the ability of the cheaters.

If anyone doesn't think the US is a Banana Republic, I have some beach front property in Nepal to sell them.




posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: underwerks
No.

Believe it or not people are voting Democratic. Even in places like Kentucky.

Scary thought I know.

Including Republicans who don't live in Kentucky and are not even US citizens?


I’m not too proud to admit it ...

... what in the heck are you referring to?



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

That’s the overall plan it seems, undermine our confidence in our political and legal systems.

And I’d be the first to admit, it’s working.



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Matters not who wins or loses, it’s all in how the votes are counted...



posted on Nov, 9 2019 @ 07:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

When democrats lose, republicans cheated.

When republicans lose, democrats cheated.

We're not voting for the best candidate, we're getting the better cheater.



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join