It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Three Impeachment Articles Against President Trump. Republican Strategy will be Operation Boomerang.

page: 3
34
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:34 PM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

Just gave you a star award for BRAVERY!

You never fear coming into an ATS lion's den.





posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:35 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Someone complaining about Trump attacking people he doesn't like:

"These are not words of an individual with a firm grasp of the significance of the office which he occupies, nor a fundamental understanding of the significance of each word he articulates by virtue of occupying that office," Bakaj wrote.



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:38 PM
link   
January 17, 2017... days before Trump even takes office
www.foxnews.com...

As more Democrats get on the bandwagon of boycotting President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, one lawmaker – Rep. Maxine Waters – took the opposition a big step further Monday and floated the possibility of impeachment.


Conspiracy to conduct a coup against a legally elected US President... hmm, I wonder how ugly that one will get during Trump's second term? Will he extend the olive branch he did to Clinton? I hope not.



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:40 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

THANK-YOU! Your insight and knowledge with these matters is VERY educational. I suggest that everyone re-read your post and remember the words as these public impeachment inquiry hearings begin.



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Lumenari

You are just in denial.

It is against the law for Trump to use money allocated by Congress to serve his own personal gain.

I think if the impeachment ever gets tried in the Senate, the Senate will convict Trump based the quality of the evidence. What I think the Senate will NOT do is acquit Trump of any wrong doing solely because he is a member of the Republican party.

But just like Nixon, I bet Trump will resign before the impeachment ever makes it to the Senate:



I was a small boy at the time but my grandmother made me watch this live.



~sigh~

You keep forgetting the part where information is not considered a thing of value.

And forgetting and forgetting and denying and delusional and beyond...

What you do need to ask yourself is this simple question.

If Joe Biden leveraged 1 billion dollars to get the Ukraine to drop the investigation into Hunter's pay for play scheme, why does it not matter to you?

Is it just because of By Any Means Necessary and you will swallow whatever corruption it takes to get your ideology into place, because then it is magically going to turn into a benevolent government for you?

Or are you just stupid?




posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: dfnj2015
The right would do exactly the same thing. This is hardball politics. What do you expect the left to do roll over and die.


How many times did Congress begin impeachment proceedings on Obama, again?


If he were White, they would have considered it.



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:49 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

House Democrats issued 30% more subpoenas this session than bills introduced for consideration. America will learn this little fact next week too.



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam
Theater of the absurd- particularly since removal has zero chance.

But the left will think they've done something meaningful, other than waste the public's time.

Political theater, that's all.

Mark Meadows has been slaying the hell out of the narrative, as well as Jim Jordan, keep an eye on those twitter feeds, they on FIRE 🔥



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa
If I were the Repubs, I would add Adam Schiff to the list of witnesses to call. Since his team was in contact with the whistleblower before he filed his complaint.
Let him try to claim he can recuse or refuse himself from being questioned. Imagine the optics on that one?


How to PROVE that Adam Schiff colluded improperly with the Whistleblower?



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Dude, I don't care what you think. I just don't.

This is coming for Trump:



Neither do we AND you are wrong as well, this is the cherry on top.

I mean, come on, a self proclaimed socialist who holds water for the left, falls for fake news and consumes it willingly because Orange Man Bad, nobody actually believes you other than the fact that you like to push opinion as fact.


edit on 7-11-2019 by Arnie123 because: Telling the little socialist facts.



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 11:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: burdman30ott6

I dont think hes gonna let the impeachment hearing turn in a two ring circus for us all to decide which fake reality is the real reality. This isnt a trial of the bidens. It's an impeachment hearing of trump.
Correction, Political theater, it is a Partisan impeachment hearing with ZERO republican support and TWO(2) Democrat defectors, with a Republican backed Senate that will neither convict or remove.

You people got nothing.



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: dawnstar
Although he might not be able to turn his impeachment hearing into a public trial of the bidens.. I think it will be up to the chief justice just how far hes gonna want to let it go..

Re-read those sentences... then look at John Roberts' history and realize that Senator Joseph Biden blocked John Roberts initial appointment to the Supreme Court in 1992.

Now...
do you really have any concerns that the Senate proceedings may include a Chief Justice willing to run block for the man who screwed him nearly 3 decades ago?



This would be akin to having Justice Kavanaugh preside over Diane Feinstein's trial for colluding with Chinese spies, wouldn't it?



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Krakatoa
If I were the Repubs, I would add Adam Schiff to the list of witnesses to call. Since his team was in contact with the whistleblower before he filed his complaint.
Let him try to claim he can recuse or refuse himself from being questioned. Imagine the optics on that one?


How to PROVE that Adam Schiff colluded improperly with the Whistleblower?


some "possibilities" exist ............... 😎💇

BREAKING: Obama’s Ukraine Ambassador Allegedly Lied Under Oath In Impeachment Inquiry, Congressman Suggests

“Before the contents of the whistleblower complaint were known publicly, a Democratic congressional staffer contact the former American ambassador to Ukraine to discuss what the staffer described as ‘quite delicate and time sensitive questions,'” Fox News’ Tucker Carlson exclusively reported.

“This show has obtained exclusively an email for that Democratic staffer for the House Foreign Affairs Committee sent by private email to the former American ambassador Marie Yovanovitch,” Carlson continued. “Yovanovitch, you know, is a key player in the Democrats’ impeachment probe and was recalled from her post in Ukraine by President Trump in May 2019 following allegations of serious partisanship and political bias.”



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:06 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust



1.) Abuse of Power by President Trump.
-and-
2.) Obstruction of Congress by President Trump.
-and-
3.) Obstruction of Justice by President Trump.


Well, that's what you get for listening to OANN and Devin Nunes.

On the other hand, here's what Nancy Pelosi is saying about the ABC's of impeachment,


Expect Pelosi and her circle, as the crescendo mounts, to sound the gong for these ABCs over and over.


abuse
betrayal
corruption

Abuse of power
Betrayal of country
Corruption of office


A quick reorg turns this list into the impeachment ABCs: abuse, betrayal, corruption. Abuse of power. Betrayal of country. Corruption of office.


www.latimes.com...

edit on 8-11-2019 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: dfnj2015

From the Republican perspective, this is an OPPORTUNITY to help President Trump "drain the swamp". The impeachment push is not a bad thing.

To quote Qanon, this is how Republicans "LEGALLY introduce their evidence" in a way that will be paid attention to by Democrats, the Mainstream Media, and every human being on the planet watching the proceedings.


Every Democrat/NWO operative will be exposed within a year 👁️😎👁️


Being hauled into post-indictment court proceedings would yield MAXIMUM exposure.



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Nancy Pelosi "says" ? 🤣 💃



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The same Nancy that met clandestinely with foreign drug smuggling powers ? 🤣💃



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:10 AM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

Nixon looks really happy in that photo. Was that before the impeachment hearing?



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Krakatoa
If I were the Repubs, I would add Adam Schiff to the list of witnesses to call. Since his team was in contact with the whistleblower before he filed his complaint.

Let him try to claim he can recuse or refuse himself from being questioned. Imagine the optics on that one?



If he refuses, charge him with contempt of Congress, for which he DOES NOT have the benefit of executive privilege to shield himself.


Does being held in "contempt of Congress" affect one's life much? Congress held Attorney General Barr in contempt earlier this year. He gave them "the finger" and went right back to investigating alleged/potential political and MSM crooks.



posted on Nov, 8 2019 @ 12:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Nancy Pelosi "says" ? 🤣 💃


Who are you going to listen to, when it come to how the article of impeachment are going to be crafted, OANN TV and Devin Nunes, or Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi?



edit on 8-11-2019 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
34
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join