It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grambler
If its ok to get dirt on your oppenent from foriegn sources,
It's illegal for YOU and your campaign to get dirt of YOUR opponent, by accepting or asking a foreign government for help. It's not illegal for a private citizen, who is not affiliated with you or your campaign, to investigate and publish anything they see fit.
Ergo, dark money Super PACS.
You've been duped and now exposed for consuming fake news, own it, get over it bruh.
originally posted by: Mark98SS
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Mark98SS
In my opinion the Whistle blower is a true American Patriot. The continued hate from the right on this person especially trying to out him/her is appalling. I would also like to know how Hunter Biden landed a cushy board job in Ukraine. That does not diminish the facts in the impeachment investigation & those facts are very damning.
Say what?
Where is the law that says this person’s identity must be concealed?
There is none.
He is nowhere near a “True American patriot”, he is verified anti-Trumper that has been associated with many high level anti-Trumpers.
Only an anti-Trumper would say he is a true American patriot because you know, feelz and Orange man bad and all that bullsh!t
Look, bottom line here: your boy has behaved very badly & needs to be punished. Simple as that & get over it.
More at: www.foxnews.com...
Sen. Rand Paul, R.-Ky., on Wednesday blocked a resolution to reaffirm whistleblower protections, accusing Democrats of “selective outrage.”
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D.-N.Y., and Sen. Mazie Hirono, D.-Hawaii, made a unanimous consent request, meaning all 100 senators must agree with no objections, to adopt a resolution underscoring the importance of protecting whistleblowers.
"I support whistleblowers, and I do think they have a role to play in keeping government accountable ... but what we have seen over the last few years is that we have a system that we should continue to refine,” said Paul, as The Hill reported.
Show me the law that says that.
Also, again, when did mueller flip to allow this obvious crime at trump tower to go unpunished?
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Grambler
It's not just that one call though. They were told to go through rudy. And rudy along with a few others were telling them that the aid was dependent on the public statement. The so called "transcript" of the call says right on it that it's a summary of the call and we cant really be sure we are getting the full summary. But well, starting next Wednesday, the public hearings will start. Time will tell I guess.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grambler
Show me the law that says that.
en.wikipedia.org...(organization)
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Grambler
A skunk by any other name is still a cute little stinker.
And has anybody who was actually on the call testify in the house? Were any of them asked? I mean there were people listening in. I do believe some were asked. But, well they cant say one way or the other, am I right? Executive priviledge and all...
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: carewemust
So isnt the loons that were pushing the comet pizza crap and oh, hillary is at deaths door crap.. and oh dead kids arent really dead!!
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grambler
Show me the law that says that.
en.wikipedia.org...(organization)
What?
Are you confused? This law says nothing about getting dirt from foreign groups on opponents.
The Court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grambler
Show me the law that says that.
en.wikipedia.org...(organization)
What?
Are you confused? This law says nothing about getting dirt from foreign groups on opponents.
What don't you get?
The Court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.