It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anti-Trump Whistleblower's Attorney is Participating in the Ongoing COUP Against President Trump.

page: 3
49
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: carewemust




"coup has started"


He said in response to Jake Tapper's tweet and news of the firing of Sally Yates...



And now he has joined and is willingly participating in the mob action.



+2 more 
posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
You know at some point some of you are going to have to face that daddy trump done something wrong


I sometimes wonder why the left use the term "daddy Trump" as an attempt to demean his voters, then I remember where it is coming from.

The left... people who need a mommy and daddy government to take care of them.

So it's merely projection.




posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mark98SS

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Mark98SS
In my opinion the Whistle blower is a true American Patriot. The continued hate from the right on this person especially trying to out him/her is appalling. I would also like to know how Hunter Biden landed a cushy board job in Ukraine. That does not diminish the facts in the impeachment investigation & those facts are very damning.


Say what?
Where is the law that says this person’s identity must be concealed?
There is none.
He is nowhere near a “True American patriot”, he is verified anti-Trumper that has been associated with many high level anti-Trumpers.
Only an anti-Trumper would say he is a true American patriot because you know, feelz and Orange man bad and all that bullsh!t


Look, bottom line here: your boy has behaved very badly & needs to be punished. Simple as that & get over it.


His punishment will be having to deal with low IQ democrats for another four years.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

the Ongoing COUP


Except that it's not a coup.



The definition is Broad. But very applicable to what Democrats have been putting President Trump thru, since January 2017.

And the Obama Administration against candidate Trump before then.


The general definition is violent, illegal, and/or unconstitutional/undemocratic, none of which are true.

Therefore, not a coup.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

That was an excellent and 100% accurate response!




posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Mark98SS

Where were all of these patriots during the Obama administration?

Funny how only when Trump does something, suddenly it's classed as something terrible and worthy of impeachment.

Prediction: when the left gains the WH and all of the same 'abuses' take place, these patriots will all disappear into the woodwork once again.

Not everyone is fooled.


We already see the same abuses took place under the past admin or candidate running for the dems.

Quid pro quo? Check

Getting dirt on opponents form russians? Check

Getting foriegn interfernce from Ukraine? Check

FARA violations? Check (podesta)

Lying to fbi? Check (Mills, abedin, Hillary)

Obstrcution of justice? Check (deleting subpoenaed emails)

Yet the dems didnt care atv all about any of that and thought it was acceptable.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grambler




He also said #rebellion, #impeachment.


Step one and step two of dealing with a coup.



Explain to me how firing sally yates was a coup.

But thank you for admitting this is a rebellion.


I think Sookie seriously believes that Trump winning the Presidency was a "coup". It was Hillary's turn and the MSM had them all believing it. Sore losers who keep taking it to the next level again and again.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

the Ongoing COUP


Except that it's not a coup.



The definition is Broad. But very applicable to what Democrats have been putting President Trump thru, since January 2017.

And the Obama Administration against candidate Trump before then.


The general definition is violent, illegal, and/or unconstitutional/undemocratic, none of which are true.

Therefore, not a coup.


Even though Democrats are leading this coup, it is very undemocratic in nature.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

the Ongoing COUP


Except that it's not a coup.



The definition is Broad. But very applicable to what Democrats have been putting President Trump thru, since January 2017.

And the Obama Administration against candidate Trump before then.


The general definition is violent, illegal, and/or unconstitutional/undemocratic, none of which are true.

Therefore, not a coup.


Unelected Intel agents or lawyers conspiring for insurance policies and rebellions before trump was even in office?

Sounds undemocratic to me.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

the Ongoing COUP


Except that it's not a coup.



The definition is Broad. But very applicable to what Democrats have been putting President Trump thru, since January 2017.

And the Obama Administration against candidate Trump before then.


The general definition is violent, illegal, and/or unconstitutional/undemocratic, none of which are true.

Therefore, not a coup.


Even though Democrats are leading this coup, it is very undemocratic in nature.


Impeachment is in the US Constitution, which is very much democratic in nature.

Therefore, not a coup.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Grambler




He also said #rebellion, #impeachment.


Step one and step two of dealing with a coup.



Explain to me how firing sally yates was a coup.

But thank you for admitting this is a rebellion.


Context.

[/pic]

The tweet was in response to this

[/pic]


"At present, I am not convinced that the defense of the executive order is consistent with these responsibilities nor am I convinced that the executive order is lawful," Yates wrote.


www.cnn.com...

Betrayal is a pretty serious charge for refusing what she thought might be an unlawful order. That's some 3rd world dictator #.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Mark98SS

Don't ask about Biden, it's election tampering to investigate a Democrat.


It's quid pro quo when Trump holds back Congress approved aid in exchange for something to benefit him personally. You just can't you see why this is a big problem.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

the Ongoing COUP


Except that it's not a coup.



The definition is Broad. But very applicable to what Democrats have been putting President Trump thru, since January 2017.

And the Obama Administration against candidate Trump before then.


The general definition is violent, illegal, and/or unconstitutional/undemocratic, none of which are true.

Therefore, not a coup.


Even though Democrats are leading this coup, it is very undemocratic in nature.


Impeachment is in the US Constitution, which is very much democratic in nature.

Therefore, not a coup.


The coup began years before this impeachment inquiry was launched.

Attorney general Barr will spell it all out for the country in the coming weeks.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Mark98SS

Don't ask about Biden, it's election tampering to investigate a Democrat.


It's quid pro quo when Trump holds back Congress approved aid in exchange for something to benefit him personally. You just can't you see why this is a big problem.


Did the president get what he wanted?



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: dfnj2015

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Mark98SS

Don't ask about Biden, it's election tampering to investigate a Democrat.


It's quid pro quo when Trump holds back Congress approved aid in exchange for something to benefit him personally. You just can't you see why this is a big problem.


Did the president get what he wanted?


Irrelevant, and moving the goal posts.

He need not receive that which he attempted to extort for there to be extortion.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

the Ongoing COUP


Except that it's not a coup.



The definition is Broad. But very applicable to what Democrats have been putting President Trump thru, since January 2017.

And the Obama Administration against candidate Trump before then.


The general definition is violent, illegal, and/or unconstitutional/undemocratic, none of which are true.

Therefore, not a coup.


By definition, what the House is doing right now is undemocratic.

You know, not allowing a portion of the citizen's representatives to be in the process.

I would also point out that the leaks that Schiff is doing to the news is illegal.

Denying a citizen of their 4th,5th, 6th and 14th Amendment rights is unconstitutional.

Which is what Trump is going through right now.




posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

No its not. Members of the executive branch serve at the pleasure of the president.

She doesnt get to declare something illegal and refuse to do it. If she has a problem, she can resign.

Trump had every right to fire his staff the refuse to carry out his policies, just as obama, clinton etc would have that right.

Uneleceted intel officers being upset trump is going against their idea of foriegn policy like Vindman, that third world banana republic stuff.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Liquesence

the Ongoing COUP


Except that it's not a coup.



The definition is Broad. But very applicable to what Democrats have been putting President Trump thru, since January 2017.

And the Obama Administration against candidate Trump before then.


The general definition is violent, illegal, and/or unconstitutional/undemocratic, none of which are true.

Therefore, not a coup.


Even though Democrats are leading this coup, it is very undemocratic in nature.


Impeachment is in the US Constitution, which is very much democratic in nature.

Therefore, not a coup.


The coup began years before this impeachment inquiry was launched.



Again, not a coup.

Neither, violent, illegal, nor unconstitutional/undemocratic, but within confines of law.


Attorney general Barr will spell it all out for the country in the coming weeks.


Sure he will.

Just like he spelled out the Mueller Report, which he mischaracterized.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: carewemust


These Anti-Trumpers never learn. Mueller, Blasey-Ford, Stormy, Avenatti, House Democrats, Liberal Media Et-al., keep formulating these poorly designed plots to either damage, or remove President Trump from office.


So all those people made Donald Trump break the law and violate the constitution.

Interesting.


What law did trump break?



He doesnt have to break a law. Impeachment is a political process and not a legal one. Congress can impeach for anything as long as they can get the votes.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Mark98SS

Don't ask about Biden, it's election tampering to investigate a Democrat.


It's quid pro quo when Trump holds back Congress approved aid in exchange for something to benefit him personally. You just can't you see why this is a big problem.


Biden wiutheld congressional approved aid in exchange for the prosecutor looking into his sons company being fired.

Trump did not do a quid pro quo, as the transcript shows, as the ukrainian preisdent admitted, as evidenced by the fact they didnt even know the money was withheld, and they got the money without giving a favor.

And he was investigating election interfence and corruption, which he has every right and duty to do




top topics



 
49
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join