It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Adam Schiff verifies whistleblower name through ethics complaint

page: 2
35
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 02:48 AM
link   
a reply to: RexKramerPRT

His credibility should be investigated by the DOJ. No need to put him in the public domain unless it's legally determined that he let himself be used as a tool by Adam Schiff.




posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 03:05 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Why does his credibility matter when Trump appointed officials have given testimony that confirms the whistle blowers accusations. At this point the whistle blower doesn't matter at all. Things have moved way beyond that.

EDIT: The IC IG determined the whistle blowers credibility and deemed it to be urgent enough to escalate to his boss, another Trump appointee.
edit on 6/11/2019 by RexKramerPRT because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 03:21 AM
link   
The fact that a staffer is basically doxxing anyone is an issue.
No verification of the whistleblower id has been confirmed.

Nor should it. The appropiate agencies will investigate that when it is appropriate.


a reply to: dfnj2015



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 04:12 AM
link   
I see it says the ethics complaint is about how a staffer claimed the leaker is Ciaramella. Its not so much a verification because even punting out the wrong name is not a good thing. It could cause reprisals and attacks against the wrong person. That said GOP leakers seem pretty set to get everyone to know who it is for coordinated attacks.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 08:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: madmac5150

This according to The Gateway Pundit.

This blows the lid off of the liberal left's impeachment drive... Ciaramella is a leftist operative... his liberal ties run VERY deep.



BREAKING: Impeachment committee chair Adam Schiff is threatening to file ethics complaint vs committee staffer he presumes leaked name Eric Ciaramella as the whistleblower; meanwhile,Rep Matt Gaetz has filed ethics complaint vs Schiff for making "false statements" re WB complaint — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 6, 2019



The cat is out of the bag... and Adam Schiff confirmed it...

Source

any other confirmation this is the guy?

seems suspicious.......no first hand info and all.......contact with schiff before turning in the complaint and all....
edit on Wed Nov 6 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: Trimmed quote



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 08:01 AM
link   
Just in...

Ciaramella got on Twitter and verified he was the whistle blowhard - against legal advice.
Whit an smazing display of attitude, his post said he was CIA and he could HAMR you.

Looking for the tweet now, could've been a parody account.
*** I love edit! ***
Tweet deleted and account suspended.
Parody accounts still in existence and going strong.
Keyword to find tweet was HAMR and Ciaramella... found replies

ganjoa
edit on 2019-11-6 by ganjoa because: NEW NFO



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 09:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: RexKramerPRT
At this point the identity of the whistle blower means nothing and outing him will only jeopardise the chances of whistle blowers from reporting wrongdoing in the future and potentially put him in harms way.

You mean like Obama's persecution of whistleblowers did?



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 09:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: RexKramerPRT
Why does his credibility matter when Trump appointed officials have given testimony that confirms the whistle blowers accusations.

You say that as if Atkinson was Trumps lifelong friend or something. He likely was suggested/recommended by one of the swamp creatures that are doing everything possible to sabotage Trump.


At this point the whistle blower doesn't matter at all. Things have moved way beyond that.

It matters a great deal if it was all a sham.


EDIT: The IC IG determined the whistle blowers credibility and deemed it to be urgent enough to escalate to his boss, another Trump appointee.

Which simply is evidence that these 'appointees' were suggested by swamp creatures that need to be eliminated.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 09:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: RexKramerPRT
So the whistle blower raised the alarm. His concerns alarmed the IG and multiple firsthand witnesses corroborated the whistle blowers account of what happened.

What have you been smoking? I want some...

We have the transcript. All of these witnesses have confirmed it is complete and accurate.

There is no bribery.


At this point the identity of the whistle blower means nothing and outing him will only jeopardise the chances of whistle blowers from reporting wrongdoing in the future and potentially put him in harms way.

Yeah, seeing as how he is an obvious deep state never-Trumper in bed with the DNC and Hillary, I wouldn't want him outed if I were one of you either.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 10:09 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl



We have the transcript.

do they have a different document?
are they reading schiffs "parody"?



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: RexKramerPRT
a reply to: carewemust

Why does his credibility matter when Trump appointed officials have given testimony that confirms the whistle blowers accusations. At this point the whistle blower doesn't matter at all. Things have moved way beyond that.

EDIT: The IC IG determined the whistle blowers credibility and deemed it to be urgent enough to escalate to his boss, another Trump appointee.

Uh, no.

All of the people who are "corroborating" the whistleblower likewise have no first-hand knowledge, and are simply repeating what they heard from someone else, or what they "presume" happened.

Everyone with actual first-hand knowledge (as in, "Yes, I was listening to the call") say there was no quid pro quo, and they don't think anything inappropriate happened.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 11:30 AM
link   
The DOJ has already cleared the call as no wrongdoing. The reason it took so long to release the whistle-blowers name is someone had to agree to be the whistleblower...



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 11:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
are they reading schiffs "parody"?

Probably... that is what Nancy herself seemed to be going by in that interview of hers.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 12:18 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Why is it so important to get this man's name out ? So someone can hurt him for talking?



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Meanwhile back at the farm staffer after staffer are testifying to the same exact story.
Do we need to vet every one? and if credibility is so important to you should not be supporting trump who lies to us constantly.



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle




It could cause reprisals and attacks against the wrong person.


As opposed to reprisals and attacks against the correct person? Because they dared speak out?



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 12:27 PM
link   
sunshine is always the best disinfectant........right......

except this one time.......right


lol


dossier part II fail.......



posted on Nov, 6 2019 @ 01:29 PM
link   

According to reporter Paul Sperry Rep. Adam Schiff is threatening an ethics complaint against the staffer who leaked the name of whistleblower Eric Ciaramella to the press


Schiffs the last person to be complaining about ones ethics.




posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 12:45 AM
link   
Evidently, he failed to sanitize the transcripts properly... OOPS

Oops! ADAM SCHIFF Accidentally Leaks Name of Anti-Trump ‘Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella in Bill Taylor’s Transcript!


...page 236 of Taylor's transcript:




ETA: They should have political "Darwin Awards"... just saying...




edit on 7-11-2019 by madmac5150 because: Oopsie

edit on 7-11-2019 by madmac5150 because: Science!!



posted on Nov, 7 2019 @ 06:10 AM
link   
a reply to: madmac5150
Hahaha
What incompetent idiots



new topics

top topics



 
35
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join