It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Grambler
I don't know about all the BS in your post. But I do know the following statements were made:
Sullivan: "Soliciting investigations into a domestic political opponent, I don't think that would be in accord with our values"
A week later, Taylor was even more concerned, texting Sondland: "As I said on the phone, I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign."
Vindman: "I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine"
Vindman: "I am a patriot, and it is my sacred duty and honor to advance and defend OUR country, irrespective of party or politics"
This why we need people to testify under oath with threat of jail time for perjury. Maybe Trump is innocent. Or, maybe if enough people testify the truth will come out.
I don't understand why Republicans do not support the rule-of-law. Does only the rule-of-law apply to Democrats?
This story makes no sense. Why would Biden want his sons company investigated harder?
originally posted by: Grambler
So I want to look at the media and democrats defense of Biden's quid pro quo (extortion) of the Ukraine that used a billion US tax dollars to force the firing of a prosecutor looking into his son's company.
originally posted by: Grambler
This story makes no sense. Why would Biden want his sons company investigated hareder?
originally posted by: Extorris
originally posted by: Grambler
So I want to look at the media and democrats defense of Biden's quid pro quo (extortion) of the Ukraine that used a billion US tax dollars to force the firing of a prosecutor looking into his son's company.
The Prosecutor was not looking into "his son's company".
All real-time reporting from that time actually shows the exact opposite.
The Prosecutor was NOT investigating corruption and THAT is why he was fired.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: Grambler
That really is confusing. Biden is running to be President in 2020. Why is he not still seeking Burisma to be investigated? He was decrying Burisma and the Ukraine corruption in 2016, why is he not heralding this investigation, especially if it could come back and clear the air before 2020 election?
a reply to: dfnj2015
Here's my prediction. Biden will NEVER serve jail time for breaking the law because Republicans are just way too incompetent.
originally posted by: links234
a reply to: Grambler
You started off strong with points 1-6 but then went way into left field with points 12+, entirely conjecture and not rooted in actual facts or presented evidence.
I'm not gonna sit here for an hour and refute all 20 something points you've tried to present because it's just a waste of time and, honestly, not worth the effort. Maybe I'll get, like, 5 stars for it, but ATS is Trumps-ville and you're not going to honestly listen.
Hell, we've already started devolving into calling a decorated war veteran an 'obese piece of #.' I'm sure we can go lower! Let's start going after his family next!!!
originally posted by: poncho1982
originally posted by: links234
a reply to: Grambler
You started off strong with points 1-6 but then went way into left field with points 12+, entirely conjecture and not rooted in actual facts or presented evidence.
I'm not gonna sit here for an hour and refute all 20 something points you've tried to present because it's just a waste of time and, honestly, not worth the effort. Maybe I'll get, like, 5 stars for it, but ATS is Trumps-ville and you're not going to honestly listen.
Hell, we've already started devolving into calling a decorated war veteran an 'obese piece of #.' I'm sure we can go lower! Let's start going after his family next!!!
Translation : "I got nothing, but I want you to believe I do."
If the truth (as you see it) is so important, post it. Refute his points. Stop making excuses.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Grambler
I don't know about all the BS in your post. But I do know the following statements were made:
Sullivan: "Soliciting investigations into a domestic political opponent, I don't think that would be in accord with our values"
A week later, Taylor was even more concerned, texting Sondland: "As I said on the phone, I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign."
Vindman: "I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine"
Vindman: "I am a patriot, and it is my sacred duty and honor to advance and defend OUR country, irrespective of party or politics"
This why we need people to testify under oath with threat of jail time for perjury. Maybe Trump is innocent. Or, maybe if enough people testify the truth will come out.
I don't understand why Republicans do not support the rule-of-law. Does only the rule-of-law apply to Democrats?
The rule of law is that the President is completely within his remit to investigate political corruption.
Running for office does not provide immunity.